- 22,551
- Arizona
- HamiltonMP427
Open up discussions without any conditions attached. The United States wants North Korea to disarm, so talk about the terms in those discussions. But so long as it's presented as "start to disarm and then we can talk", it will only reaffirm the North's belief that the United States is trying to inflict its view of the world on everyone else. It also seems to be doomed to fail from the outset so that if conflict comes about, the Trump administration can say "well, we tried the diplomatic approach" - but if they knew it wasn't going to work and proposed the talks in such a way that it would fall apart before it began, did they really try? Or did they just tick a box and move on?
Tick a box? It's the same foreign policy as Obama, Bush and Clinton. I'm confused, you've complained he's not acting like a politician and does gut reactions, yet when it comes to following long term foreign policy you still have issue? Pick an option will you, rather than just find a default that tries to supports your view of anti-Trump.
This is the diplomatic approach and respects the NPT, the only other option I'm aware of is let North Korea have the weapon, or adopt the Chinese policy on the subject.
Last edited: