- 20,681
- TenEightyOne
- TenEightyOne
And yet his evidence shows that attacks on the infrastructure in Lebanon continued right through to last month. Part of the purpose of these hearings is to make an ongoing plan under the new admin, no?
As far as I can see, he's talking about three specific countries:And yet his evidence shows that attacks on the infrastructure in Lebanon continued right through to last month. Part of the purpose of these hearings is to make an ongoing plan under the new admin, no?
The Obama administration "systematically disbanded" law enforcement investigative units across the federal government focused on disrupting Iranian, Syrian, and Venezuelan terrorism financing networks
And speaking of crazy religious talk, this group wants the right to ban people with mental illness from mass:
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-...riminated-against-disabled-sex-change/8612052
The irony is not lost on me.
Looks like they're talking about people involved with church leadership, not the attendees.And speaking of crazy religious talk, this group wants the right to ban people with mental illness from mass:
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-...riminated-against-disabled-sex-change/8612052
The irony is not lost on me.
"Nowhere does the submission say that we don't want people with disturbed behaviour to be part of a church.
"What we have said is that church organisations should be able, in making decisions about employment, who leads the service, it is entirely appropriate that people who fulfil those roles not be people who manifest disturbed behaviour."
In an earlier statement, he said "we have absolutely no desire to exclude disabled persons" and "our policy submission raises concerns about problematic behaviours, not disability status".
Um, this is the American thread. What the Australians do is entirely on them.And speaking of crazy religious talk, this group wants the right to ban people with mental illness from mass:
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-...riminated-against-disabled-sex-change/8612052
The irony is not lost on me.
Looks like they're talking about people involved with church leadership, not the attendees.
"Our submission did not say we should be able to discriminate with a blank canvas in areas of mental disability," Rev Saunders said.
"It is appropriate in some circumstances to discriminate justifiably where the person is involved in disturbed behaviour that is contrary to the best interests of the organisation.
One example was outburst of profanity; I'm guessing that's the "disturbed" area. Not a solid choice of them using that word, either imo.They also say before that...
Also they give no ideas on what they consider "disturbed", I've seen people with severe bipolar have outbursts over the simple and most unreasonable things, I'm curious where that falls in.
Also what @Chrunch Houston said
One example was outburst of profanity; I'm guessing that's the "disturbed" area. Not a solid choice of them using that word, either imo.
I seems to me that @prisonermonkeys found an article about some backward-assed people, and just assumed they were Americans. We did elect Trump after all.Doesn't matter though because as Chrunch said this isn't the Aussie thread, I'm more curious as to the point of why it was posted here.
Probably just a mistake. I'm guessing he probably meant to misrepresent that link in the Australian thread instead of here. I'm more curious as to whether he actually reads the stories in the links he posts or just sees the clickbait headline and does the old copy/paste routine.That's my point, that could be anything from Bipolar to Schizophrenia and so on, so for them to say it isn't a blank canvas and then give a vague example...really does a great contradiction. Doesn't matter though because as Chrunch said this isn't the Aussie thread, I'm more curious as to the point of why it was posted here.
I seems to me that @prisonermonkeys found an article about some backward-assed people, and just assumed they were Americans. We did elect Trump after all.
You would think he would have at least read the story before posting it. It did come from Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
Probably just a mistake. I'm guessing he probably meant to misrepresent that link in the Australian thread instead of here.
Correct.I'm sure he knows it was Aussie, he lives there and opens webpages that are aussie based by default...
I saw that the current discussion was about religion-themed crazy and thought the story fit tangentially.That's a possibility and most likely my initial thought, since he's posted in the wrong thread by mistake in the past from time to time.
But you didn't feel the need to specify that those particular crazies were Australians. Nice. You see the responses before I pointed it out, thought they were Americans. I would think a professional like you would know a little more about context.I saw that the current discussion was about religion-themed crazy and thought the story fit tangentially.
As far as I can see, he's talking about three specific countries:
I trusted that you were smart enough to read the article and figure it out for yourself while being amused by it.But you didn't feel the need to specify that those particular crazies were Australians.
Yes, so amusing, I giggled all the way through it. Now I guess I can start posting North Korean news stories in the Australian thread with no context.I trusted that you were smart enough to read the article and figure it out for yourself while being amused by it.
Of course. I don't see anything in it that contradicts the thrust of the article. Kassim Tajideen was arrested after Obama left office and he had operations all over Africa and was arrested in Morocco. Sanctions are about to be introduced against Hezbollah, again, by Trump, and after Obama.Hezbollah, actually. Did you read your own sources?
As he should. There are multiple conflicts of interest here.Meanwhile, in actual news, Trump is reportedly considering firing Robert Mueller:
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-...considering-axing-russia-investigator/8614596
I trusted that you were smart enough to read the article and figure it out for yourself while being amused by it.
Everything has a price, Kathy beheading Trump, Trumps assassination during the Caesar play, the vitriol and everything else eventually will inspire acts of violence such as this.
Everything has a price, Kathy beheading Trump, Trumps assassination during the Caesar play, the vitriol and everything else eventually will inspire acts of violence such as this.
I agree with you that this is an opportunity to dial down the rhetoric and come together in denouncement of violence. But... I will not blame actors and satirists for the actions of others. This is not a price paid for freedom of speech.
Bollocks. Don't forget why there was a stabbing scene in Julius Caesar in the first place, nutterism goes back a long way.
Have you ever read Julius Caesar? Or seen a production of it? If you had, you would understand what the play is trying to do, and it's not advocating the murder of a president. It's a critical examination of the nature of leadership, political extremism, patriotism and popularism, and individual and social responses to it. Shakespeare frequently used his works as politucal commentary - The Tempest was a discourse on good governance and tge responsibilities of leaders, and was aimed squarely at King James I, who had been violently cracking down on Catholics at the time. If he were alive today, Shakespeare would likely be writing a play called Donald Trump.Trumps assassination during the Caesar play
Have you ever read Julius Caesar? Or seen a production of it? If you had, you would understand what the play is trying to do, and it's not advocating the murder of a president. It's a critical examination of the nature of leadership, political extremism, patriotism and popularism, and individual and social responses to it. Shakespeare frequently used his works as politucal commentary - The Tempest was a discourse on good governance and tge responsibilities of leaders, and was aimed squarely at King James I, who had been violently cracking down on Catholics at the time. If he were alive today, Shakespeare would likely be writing a play called Donald Trump.
We shouldn't shy away from art, literature and theatre that is critical of political instututions. Arthur Miller's The Crucible is one of the most important pieces of American literature, and it was a direct response to McCarthyism. Because what's the alternative - ban anything that might be critical of Trump? In the Shakesperean canon, that means there is no place for Julius Caesar, Macbeth, The Tempest, Coriolanus, King Richard III or King Henry V.
Well, read it before you judge it. Caesar's assassination is the centrepiece of the play, but it's the events afterwards that are most meaningful.No I haven't, I have only seen Macbeth and Romeo and Juliet (Live productions of both). I might have read Julius Caesar when I was very young but I don't recall.
Draining the swamp means not only ejecting Trump from the presidency, but also bringing himself and everyone assisting in his agenda up on charges of treason. They must be convicted (there is little room to doubt their guilt). And then — upon receiving guilty verdicts — they must all be executed under the law. Anything less than capital punishment — or at least life imprisonment without parole in a maximum security detention facility — would send yet another message to the world that America has lost its moral compass. In order for America’s morality and leadership to be restored, it must rebuke Donald Trump, his entire administration, and his legislative agenda in the strongest manner possible. And nothing would do more than to convict them of the highest offense defined by our Constitution, and then to deliver the ultimate punishment. Donald Trump deserves nothing less. Mitch McConnell, Steve Bannon, and Paul Ryan should also share Donald Trump’s fate, for they have done more than practically anyone to protect him and to throw our country under the proverbial bus. In order to survive, we as a nation must deliver the ultimate punishment under the law to all involved in its current destruction.
HuffPost pulls article that calls for the trial & execution for Trump & everyone in his administration. The writer of the article even dismisses the thought of bringing up facts to support his argument ("The sad thing is that I don’t even have to run through a laundry list of his wrongdoings and cite a litany of sources."). The bolded below is the author's own doing; playing judge, jury, and executioner.
This lunatic isn't doing the rest of the media favors, let alone Huffpost, writing stuff like this. It could be spun against the Left very easily, esp. in the wake of what happened today.
You can read the full cached version here:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...afee4b094fa859f19ce+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us