America - The Official Thread

  • Thread starter ///M-Spec
  • 40,452 comments
  • 1,847,080 views
Here's the real TelePrompTer-err:

The Airbus Consortium wasn't founded until 1811, which led to the surprise attack on Dulles. Admiral La Guardia fell into a holding pattern, flow control held up Atlanta's forces, and Hartford-Springfield was stuck in Windsor's Lock. Eventually, our US Airways were pre-cleared by the McDonnell-Douglas offensive, with support from the Reagan Nationals and General Logan along the jet stream, so Americans are always thankful for the invention of the baggage conveyor and we support those brave men, women, and emotional support animals by raising our tray tables in salute.

7/47: never forget.
 
Last edited:
Fox News, the Most trusted Liar in the Media.


God help us.

I look at the Fox website very day, to get caught up on "alternative facts" & opinions. It's always a faintly disturbing experience ... especially scrolling through the comments sections. Apparently, CNN is the "communist news network " - a view point which is bizarrely, disturbingly off-base, as if opposition to Trumpism is inherently "left wing". The head-scratching assumption being that career establishment figures like HRC, Comey, Clapper et al are "leftists". :rolleyes:
 
Even as old wars are being reimagined, the future is being plotted. It is a future of Authoritarian Capitalism, just what we've always lacked. Any worries of unruly democracy or pesky human rights questions can now be laid to rest. :rolleyes:
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/01/com...d-us-china-russia.html?recirc=taboolainternal
Bit stupid though, Russia has a smaller Economy then Australia why do they get the higher status?

God help us.

I look at the Fox website very day, to get caught up on "alternative facts" & opinions. It's always a faintly disturbing experience ... especially scrolling through the comments sections. Apparently, CNN is the "communist news network " - a view point which is bizarrely, disturbingly off-base, as if opposition to Trumpism is inherently "left wing". The head-scratching assumption being that career establishment figures like HRC, Comey, Clapper et al are "leftists". :rolleyes:
MSM In General is filled with Partisan hacks, FOX is easily the worst when it comes to that, but CNN isn't above criticism, like MSNBC they Certainly seem to beat the war drums more then Fox do right now(which is probably more related to how Trump has been talking on war rather then them actually having any principals), The Right Wing Nut jobs that watch any of this crap and think CNN is leftist have gotten identity politics(Which is loved by the Media) confused with left wing ideology.

Still I don't know how anyone can watch Hannity with a straight face, that guy is a Total Snake.
 
Last edited:
Bit stupid though, Russia has a smaller Economy then Australia why do they get the higher status?

MSM In General is filled with Partisan hacks, FOX is easily the worst when it comes to that, but CNN isn't above criticism, like MSNBC they Certainly seem to beat the war drums more then Fox do right now(which is probably more related to how Trump has been talking on war rather then them actually having any principals), The Right Wing Nut jobs that watch any of this crap and think CNN is leftist have gotten identity politics(Which is loved by the Media) confused with left wing ideology.

Still I don't know how anyone can watch Hannity with a straight face, that guy is a Total Snake.
I literally just listen to the news for just news. Just report the facts, I don't need to hear your opinion because I can make my own opinions.
 
Bit stupid though, Russia has a smaller Economy then Australia why do they get the higher status?
Which Axis of Authoritarian Superpowers do you suppose has the best chance of global ascendency, Russia, China and the US, or Australia, China and the US?
 
Some aspects of the American media should be state owned. That’s just my opinion. And no, Trump would definitely not be in charge of it, thank goodness.

When I say, “some aspects”, I am referring to news which simply covers important events (statewide, nationwide, and global) and states the details and facts regarding them. There wouldn’t be any analysis or opinion on these events, just stating what had happened, leaving the reader to formulate their own opinions. This side of the media should be controlled by the federal government, a team of media directors would be elected to oversee the news publication and other officials would make sure nothing being published by the state is false, deceiving, or overtly biased.

That being said, analytical news sources such as the New York Times, Washington Post, among others, should still exist, so that readers can have the opportunity to grasp the perspective of someone highly educated and articulate. And extremist propaganda news sources, like InfoWars for example, which spreads nothing but conspiracy theories and bigotry, should be shut down.
 
Some aspects of the American media should be state owned. That’s just my opinion. And no, Trump would definitely not be in charge of it, thank goodness.

When I say, “some aspects”, I am referring to news which simply covers important events (statewide, nationwide, and global) and states the details and facts regarding them. There wouldn’t be any analysis or opinion on these events, just stating what had happened, leaving the reader to formulate their own opinions. This side of the media should be controlled by the federal government, a team of media directors would be elected to oversee the news publication and other officials would make sure nothing being published by the state is false, deceiving, or overtly biased.

That being said, analytical news sources such as the New York Times, Washington Post, among others, should still exist, so that readers can have the opportunity to grasp the perspective of someone highly educated and articulate. And extremist propaganda news sources, like InfoWars for example, which spreads nothing but conspiracy theories and bigotry, should be shut down.

You mean like NPR?
 
Some aspects of the American media should be state owned. That’s just my opinion. And no, Trump would definitely not be in charge of it, thank goodness.

When I say, “some aspects”, I am referring to news which simply covers important events (statewide, nationwide, and global) and states the details and facts regarding them. There wouldn’t be any analysis or opinion on these events, just stating what had happened, leaving the reader to formulate their own opinions. This side of the media should be controlled by the federal government, a team of media directors would be elected to oversee the news publication and other officials would make sure nothing being published by the state is false, deceiving, or overtly biased.

That being said, analytical news sources such as the New York Times, Washington Post, among others, should still exist, so that readers can have the opportunity to grasp the perspective of someone highly educated and articulate. And extremist propaganda news sources, like InfoWars for example, which spreads nothing but conspiracy theories and bigotry, should be shut down.
Lovely! Now a Government Department of Truth! This will be vital as we go forward in Axis with Russia and China to establish the New World Order.
 
Some aspects of the American media should be state owned. That’s just my opinion. And no, Trump would definitely not be in charge of it, thank goodness.

When I say, “some aspects”, I am referring to news which simply covers important events (statewide, nationwide, and global) and states the details and facts regarding them. There wouldn’t be any analysis or opinion on these events, just stating what had happened, leaving the reader to formulate their own opinions. This side of the media should be controlled by the federal government, a team of media directors would be elected to oversee the news publication and other officials would make sure nothing being published by the state is false, deceiving, or overtly biased.

That being said, analytical news sources such as the New York Times, Washington Post, among others, should still exist, so that readers can have the opportunity to grasp the perspective of someone highly educated and articulate. And extremist propaganda news sources, like InfoWars for example, which spreads nothing but conspiracy theories and bigotry, should be shut down.
NYT and Washington Post are pretty much Partisan Garbage, sure you can swim through the trash to get your facts but your not exactly making a strong point there.

I would start on the Debates, the Debates should be on C-Span and get the stupid Cable news networks the hell away from it.
 
NYT and Washington Post are pretty much Partisan Garbage, sure you can swim through the trash to get your facts but your not exactly making a strong point there.

Isn't that making rather a strong judgement on the intelligence of those posters? I could read a Daily Mail article and come away with some facts that are genuine, and I'd trust myself to have the right questions afterwards.
 
Isn't that making rather a strong judgement on the intelligence of those posters? I could read a Daily Mail article and come away with some facts that are genuine, and I'd trust myself to have the right questions afterwards.
Hey I never said it can't be done, just I don't like the idea that it has to be done.

I mean he singled it out and Decided something else should be banned.

Personally I don't think any of it should get banned just pointing there is some hypocrisy of his views on that.
 
NYT and Washington Post are pretty much Partisan Garbage, sure you can swim through the trash to get your facts but your not exactly making a strong point there.

I would start on the Debates, the Debates should be on C-Span and get the stupid Cable news networks the hell away from it.
I disagree with your statements about NYT and WashPost, but I absolutely agree that cable news should have no involvement amongst the debates. I’ve watched (and rewatched) both the Democrat and Republican debates of 2016, and you could tell that some of the questions are too biased, for both parties.
 
I disagree with your statements about NYT and WashPost, but I absolutely agree that cable news should have no involvement amongst the debates. I’ve watched (and rewatched) both the Democrat and Republican debates of 2016, and you could tell that some of the questions are too biased, for both parties.
The questions in the debates this year are already Biased, it's nothing new and has been terrible ever since I watched the 2007 elections and would be well before that.

Questions getting framed in twisted ways, establishment Policians getting Soft Balls it's all obvious as daylight.

Lucky everyone has access to the open secrets cheat sheet to see who is really on a Banker or Military Industrial Payroll, all though alot of Lobby groups are going into a more shady tactic of Donating large contributions from employees of said Corps so they don't have to disclose where the money came from, so now Large individual Contributions are generally Frowned apon by most looking for a Geniune Candidate.
 
Last edited:
The questions in the debates this year are already Biased, it's nothing new and has been terrible ever since I watched the 2007 elections and would be well before that.

Questions getting framed in twisted ways, establishment Policians getting Soft Balls it's all obvious as daylight.

Lucky everyone has access to the open secrets cheat sheet to see who is really on a Banker or Military Industrial Payroll, all though alot of Lobby groups are going into a more shady tactic of Donating large contributions from employees of said Corps so they don't have to disclose where the money came from, so now Large individual Contributions are generally Frowned apon by most looking for a Geniune Candidate.

Let us not forget slipping debate questions in advance to the favored candidate.
 
Oh boy, can't wait to see Trump & Clinton dragged through as Con./Lib. talking points, even though most of the reports I've read, reference comments from both Presidents on Epstein made way back in 2000-2002.
 
Last edited:
Oh boy, can't wait to see Trump & Clinton dragged through as Con./Lib. talking points, even though most of the reports I've read, reference comments from both Presidents on Epstein made way back in 2000-2002.

I'll put my house on Trump being clean. Before Trump took office he said he was going to smash paedo rings up and down the country. Thats why they hate him, thats why Hollywood hates him. He signed to anti trafficking actions last year. I bet my mate a tenner the media will refer to Epstein as Trumps friend. If all the dirty paedos are named i expect to see Robert De Niro's name pop up.
 
Before Trump took office he said he was going to smash paedo rings up and down the country. Thats why they hate him, thats why Hollywood hates him. He signed to anti trafficking actions last year.
Please tell me you aren't serious.

The likelihood of Trump being involved in a "paedo ring" is probably much higher than him ever destructing one. After all, this is a man in which roughly 25 women have accused Trump of sexual misconduct (ranging from lewd comments to groping to battery to even forcible rape), and he brags about groping and objectifying them. Surely him of all people will stand up for young girls!

Hollywood hates Trump because Trump is a bigot, plain and simple.
 
Please tell me you aren't serious.

The likelihood of Trump being involved in a "paedo ring" is probably much higher than him ever destructing one. After all, this is a man in which roughly 25 women have accused Trump of sexual misconduct (ranging from lewd comments to groping to battery to even forcible rape), and he brags about groping and objectifying them. Surely him of all people will stand up for young girls!

The guy who bragged about strolling into the dressing rooms of the beauty pageants he used to own? The ones full of teenage girls? I'd never believe that he could be interested in teenage girls in a sexual way. He was totally just inspecting the changing rooms to make sure they were up to his high standards. The teenage nudity was merely incidental.
 
Here's the real TelePrompTer-err:

The Airbus Consortium wasn't founded until 1811, which led to the surprise attack on Dulles. Admiral La Guardia fell into a holding pattern, flow control held up Atlanta's forces, and Hartford-Springfield was stuck in Windsor's Lock. Eventually, our US Airways were pre-cleared by the McDonnell-Douglas offensive, with support from the Reagan Nationals and General Logan along the jet stream, so Americans are always thankful for the invention of the baggage conveyor and we support those brave men, women, and emotional support animals by raising our tray tables in salute.

7/47: never forget.
joukc69t8v831.jpg
 
Back