UKMikey
Premium
- 18,253
- Grea'er Laandan
- UKMikeyA
- UKMikeyA
Ask me again after the result of the election is declared.Is the US situation absolutely terrifying?
Ask me again after the result of the election is declared.Is the US situation absolutely terrifying?
Ask me again after the result of the election is declared.
Please... I have enough worries with my own government to fret about hypotheticals.Heh, I'm asking now because of the possibilities.
Is the US situation absolutely terrifying?
Not only have they passed several referendums over the past several years, but the US Congress has also presented at least one which was shelved of course.When/if Puerto Rico passes a referendum requesting statehood (I believe they already have at least once) then the US should accommodate it.
No amendment required. You quoted the only requirement the constitution has for DC, which is its maximum size. It doesn't say where it has to be, what shape it has to be, or that it can't simply be made smaller. Both making DC smaller and admitting a new state would merely be a matter of passing a law stating both the new shape of DC and providing statehood to the area beyond the new DC. I imagine this would be done in two different laws passed concurrently.As for the District of Columbia, on the other hand, there were valid reasons why the district is not a part of any state and is under direct control of the federal government.
To grant it statehood would require a Constitutional amendment; Article I Section 8 which delimits the powers of the Congress states in part:
If any changes of status were to be made, it should be to return the land to Virginia and Maryland, who ceded it to the federal government originally. This too would require a constitutional amendment.
This guy over here providing actual research instead of intuition. Who invited youThat's just what the Republicans say, though. Dems say you can shrink the District and move the rest into a new state. Ceding it back to the old states would decrease representation, not increase it.
https://norton.house.gov/sites/norton.house.gov/files/Dinh.pdf
This has happened before:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_retrocession
Slash and burn.What worries me more about a Trump 2nd term (or even a lame duck few months) vs his first term is a Donald Trump with nothing to lose.
Alright so I have to ask our outside-the-US members a quick question.
Is the US situation absolutely terrifying? I mean, an amazing amount of destructive military power is under the thumb of Donald Trump, who is not exactly a mountain of stability (see the crazed/weird showdown between him and North Korea early in his term, and his drug-induced motorcade more recently). But the wheels are coming off fast right now. The republicans shrugged any level of accountability for him during impeachment, effectively allowing him to shake down foreign governments to become mouthpieces for his campaigning, there is evidence of Russian involvement in the current election cycle, and all of the checks and balances that would normally prevent the US from having an autocrat seem to be falling away at breakneck speed (esp: first amendment and due process).
It's terrifying to be inside the US right now, for sure. But also I'm not particularly worried (partly based on my personal demographic) that the full force of the US government is going to come after me if we see a second Trump term. However, it seems to me that from outside the US it could look even scarier. US military might has been, I think, somewhat palatable to the rest of the world given the structure of leadership at the top. I know we don't have a history of exactly minding our own business, be we also haven't gone on a worldwide conquest spree. If the structure of the US government falls away, the behavior of the country might get significantly less... restrained.
Anyway, how does this look from outside the country? Is the downside here just another China or Russia? Or do you guys feel like a handful of voters in Pennsylvania are standing between relative peace and a new flavor of authoritarianism starting to spread.
Is the US situation absolutely terrifying?
If the meme sites are anything to go by, no. America is now Dumb****istan, and destroying itself from the inside out. All the rage that was once caused by international intervention by the US has turned into laughter about the internal issues you're going through. In fact, people are already getting tired of the Americans flooding the funny sites with their issues.
That's interesting. I think that's somewhat shortsighted. An unstable US could be a major problem for the world.
I rarely get to listen to his first hour, so I missed that. I saw a bit of it on Twitter.I know no one here likes Rush Limbaugh but I listened to yesterday's episode today.
His stage 4 lung cancer has become terminal...
I know no one here likes Rush Limbaugh but I listened to yesterday's episode today.
His stage 4 lung cancer has become terminal...
I give you a like cause I just sent my beer laughing saying that to myself in his voice...
I know no one here likes Rush Limbaugh but I listened to yesterday's episode today.
His stage 4 lung cancer has become terminal...
This is fun:There is no one out there that is as good as him. Not even close.
Wait, what?! I knew he had addiction problems in his past but I didn't know he was a dealer.Limbaugh is a hack, a hypocritical, drug trafficking, anti-science, lying hack.
I don't wish death upon him though.
I believe the trafficking charge is when he was caught coming from the Dominican Republican with prescription drugs, but his name wasn't on the prescription. I believe they dropped those charges, but it did come after he was accused of trying to get overlapping prescriptions from doctors.Wait, what?! I knew he had addiction problems in his past but I didn't know he was a dealer.
Cameron did not give the jury an opportunity to pursue homicide charges against the two officers who shot Breonna Taylor, Jon Mattingly and Myles Cosgrove. “The grand jury was not presented any charges other than the three Wanton Endangerment charges against Detective Hankison,” the juror wrote.
The jurors listen to evidence from a prosecutor, who is supposed to explain what charges are available for them to consider. Typically, grand juries return an indictment based on a prosecutor’s recommendation.
Wait, what?! I knew he had addiction problems in his past but I didn't know he was a dealer.
You joshin me?but I get the feeling that the prosecutor didn't feel the case for homicide was very strong.
he was bringing Viagra back from the Dominican Republic
Sounds like a hardened criminal to me.
I'll get my coat.
Beyond parody. The omnishamble fatigue is just too much.