Danoff
Premium
- 33,948
- Mile High City
but it seems like there's some overlap there where traditional conservatives might prefer a Libertarian candidate to a Democratic one. At least if they were willing to look at policy rather than get caught up on the names of things.
I don't know what a traditional conservative is anymore. When the religious right started taking over the Republican party, I thought the party would shove them out in favor of its more traditionally conservative views on limited government. Instead the religious movement within the republicans was embraced, and I think that movement is authoritarian.
Nobody who holds to any semblance of libertarianism should be voting for Trump. In this election, you're going to be able to count up the number of authoritarians really easily, because it'll be a nearly 1:1 ratio with voters for trump. I think we're expected to see more than 150 million votes in 2020, with an anticipated 45% going for trump.
I other words we have nearly 67 million authoritarians in the US. I don't doubt that a libertarian candidate running as a republican could capture many of those votes if there were no alternative. I mean, McCain was not an authoritarian and he probably got a lot of those votes. But this group is going to continue to prefer authoritarians over libertarians, and I think overall it represents a much larger group than libertarians.
Socialists are a tougher group to estimate. Bernie and Warren got a combined 11 million in the primaries. You have to think some of Biden's 20 million also included socialists as well. Just out of total guesswork, I'd say that the number of socialists in the US outnumbers the number of libertarian-minded voters by a substantial number. And authoritarians for sure.
Last edited: