State of emergency is yet another sad outcome of what happened(was one of the revolution's demand to cancel said law)however it seems that it was a needed call to take control,doubt it will last a month though.
A state of emergency amounts to martial law. Indeed, the military is ruling in all cities and provinces. As for the civilian government, the parliament and judiciary are more or less dissolved, and in the executive ElBaradei has resigned as VP and Mansour is a merely a toothless, freshly installed puppet president.
There is NO plan for fresh elections at any of these levels, so the only rule as far as the eye can see is military - just like the good old days of Mubarek!
By the way, opinion on Arab news websites seems divided as to whether the 'evil' army dictatorship are atheists, zionists or satanists...
Events of today and yesterday just about prove without a doubt the terrorists are the MB.
How could you have been so foolish as to democratically vote them in?? You have really screwed up bad for doing that.
So now, what are you going to do since you have decided they are terrorists? Arrest them all? They are the oldest, largest organized party in Egypt. If you try to deny them rights to participate in the political process, it will be you who are inciting to riot.
A time machine to take you back in time for a do-over would be helpful. Perhaps you could summon a genie for a few magical wishes?
I am not sure why you're so worked up on this subject though.
I've been studying the whole Arab spring uprising from Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Syria, and trying to understand how it all connects and fits together - it it does. Who benefits, who loses and pays the costs.
It's not so much that I am worked up about it. After all, it is not my country that is rioting and revolting. But the hands and the interests of the US run deep into the Mideast. I need to keep an eye on what my politicians, statesmen and warriors are doing over there.
I think The US backs the MB and would very much like an MB president as someone they can control and make sure they keep peace with Israel etc.
Who benefits from Muslim Countries being week and fighting each other?,certainly not the Middle east.
Yes, the US, and Israel, benefits from weak Arab states with internal factions fighting each other.
I would like to see hard evidence that the US backs the MB. Where's the money?
In any case, you cannot imagine how angry Americans will be if our access to your Suez Canal is somehow endangered or cut off.
before being elected the MB fooled us into thinking they are a peaceful organisation that will rule by the rules of Islam,plus due to the revolution candidates being alot the votes were spread amongst them allowing Morsi and Shafeeq(a minister in the government oof Mubarak) to be in the final vote decider,so Most of us trusted Morsi as we had no choice we couldn't let Shafeeq win.So no nothing foolish about it.
Don't you know that the state is evil and attracts sociopaths? Crooks and liars, as they say. Never trust a politician. How many times have people been fooled by governments over the years? Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me a thousand times, wtf, why do I keep falling for it?
Wait...are you sure we're not talking about Obama?plus the fact the MB bribed the poor people to vote for him
Wait...are you sure we're not talking about Obama?
I still have trouble seeing who is the greater evil between the two...much like are two party system, eh?
But seriously can some one give me insight that has backing and not CNN Pundits fighting it out for one side or the other.
The MB is the greater evil, by far. Instead, a brutal military dictatorship which provides peace and prosperity, protection for minorities, promotes tourism and maintains the Camp David Accords is GREATLY to be preferred. Some ill-advised Egyptian people simply got infatuated with democracy and it bit them on the ass.
I might be able to accept that, but then there is the whole ya know videos of people unarmed getting shot by the military.
I'm afraid we in the west must hold our nose and look the other way when brutal military dictators (whom we are allied with and must support out of our strategic self-interest) must do their dirty work. It comes with the territory of being a global hegemon.
Back in the bad old days people like Stalin could exterminate whole populations of unruly people. Even in Jolly Olde Medieval England, traitorous families were extinguished entirely with their heads put on spikes. Think of the Wars of the Roses between Yorks and Lancasters. It was extremely important for the English to kill infants and children so that there could be no future pretenders to the throne. Edward brutally suppressed Wales from a ring of intimidating castles that makes splendid places to visit today.
If we are disturbed by foreigners killing each other, it may simply be that we have tuned in to the wrong channel on our i-Pads, and need to pay more attention to Justin Bieber and our latest ounce of AK-47, sad to say.
Finally the excuus needed by the UN to invade in the Syria and continue the policy of genocide?
People really believe Assad is stupid enough to do a chemical attack a day after UN inspectors have come to Syria to do inspections? The Assad government was winning the fight against terrorism without using chemical weapons! Oh but lets wait till the UN inspectors come over to do a chemical attack because thats how stupid Assad must be...
Wait, let me get this straight, Assad is the good guy? Don't get me wrong there are Al Qaeda guns for hire that are even killing western backed, opposition forces along with Assad's military....but you're telling us Assad is the good guy?
Can you Highlight where I said hw is a "good guy"? Assad is not a "good guy" but I prefer him over the people that are trying to turn the secular Syrian state into a sharia ****hole. Now I will ask you a question:
Do you believe, Assad is stupid enough to have his army do a chemical attack?