dopedog
(Banned)
- 880
- United Kingdom
Scaff's review was very good as were several others, but again, my purpose was only to explain why, IMO, I though each of the reviewers in question provided the scores they did, not to say one is better or more appropriate than the other.
But the implication seemed to be "one gets it" (the positive review) the other doesn't, i personally want a review to cover everything present, i can make my own personal decision how important each area is to me.
I never wanted AC for the career, i just knew i had to have it regardless, i never really expected it to offer a better racing experience than PCars and it doesn't, so i'm happy.
It's simple AC for physics, FFB, car feel is 9/10, I 'get it' I have a wheel, i have a room in my house solely for the pursuit of gaming with a 'rig' etc, I have had track day cars semi race prepped Alfa 155 and Alfa 75 V6, i 'get it'.
But i'd still want people to know everything the game says it offers and review based on that so overall it the moment it's a 7/10 OVERALL IMO.
The notion someone can't 'get it' just because they review it based on its purpose as a game is absurd. It is like it or not, a game.