- 2,810
- Tasmania, AU
- stigsdaddy
As far as I'm aware, the point of rFactor Pro is that it is designed to allow race teams to plug in their own data and customize the simulator to meet their needs, plus of course a good library of laser scanned tracks.
I'd argue that less has filtered down from rF Pro to rF 2 than might be expected....
Teams plug in the data, that's true, but what Rfactor pro is is the base simulation. The physics calculations and such. It's more complex than any consumer grade sim, and requires decent computing power, but it provides a very realistic simulation in which race teams can input the data of their cars to get a feel for them, train drivers, and test new parts. I've read F1 teams input the data they gather from CFD and wind tunnel into the sim to test the parts there before making the parts and testing them on track. This helps them get a rough idea of parts, and the track testing of the physical parts helps them to correlate their cfd and wind tunnel data, and improve the accuracy of the sim.
Edit: RFpro isn't even managed by ISI, but by another company, who basically gets ISI to do the base work, and then caters it to each specific client. ISI gets data from the owners of RFpro though, Tim Wheatley said as much on ISI's forums.
Last edited: