- 9,554
- Vermont
- catamount39
But with the Alfa badging and styling cues, and wheels, it looks 20 times better than the DB10.![]()
Am i the only one who's seeing a bit of this, with a roof?
![]()
But with the Alfa badging and styling cues, and wheels, it looks 20 times better than the DB10.![]()
Am i the only one who's seeing a bit of this, with a roof?
![]()
I would say that is the influence of the film production. They have really been aiming to have a very grounded Bond, and cars like the original Vanquish were just too ostentatious. They obviously want an Aston, but they don't want something that sticks out like a sore thumb. After all, this is a Bond who will drive Fords and Volvos and - supposedly - Fiats to blend in if need be.
Out of curiosity, is Ian Callum still designing for Aston Martin? Would explain the Spectre a lot, imo.F-Type.
Am I the only one seeing a lot of Mercedes-AMG GT in the side profile? Especially towards the rear.
I kind of wish they just stuck Bond in a new Vanquish. Not a fan of this DB10.
which copied the Aston Martin V12 Zagato?but it reminded me of a F - Type
I always liked that old joke talking about how they gave Bond's DB5 a revolving licence plate so he could evade notice, then he drove it around some piss poor Eastern European hellhole for half of Goldfinger.Considering how the car was designed for the movie, that makes sense. Still, in terms of wanting a more realistic approach, the idea of a spy driving a luxury grand tourer is unrealistic in the very first place though.
Maybe because it is a rebodied Vantage?but size wise - i really hope this design influences the next Vantage, as the proportions look spot on for it.
![]()
Nissan, oh you..![]()
"Oh, and remember Mr Bond, if you happen to chase some terrorists around the Nürburgring press this to set your suspension, this to set traction control... this to set stability control, and this to get better throttle response. I think that was all."![]()
Nissan, oh you..![]()
"Oh, and remember Mr Bond, if you happen to chase some terrorists around the Nürburgring press this to set your suspension, this to set traction control... this to set stability control, and this to get better throttle response. I think that was all."
Out of curiosity, is Ian Callum still designing for Aston Martin? Would explain the Spectre a lot, imo.
That DB10 looks really, really good. I'm surprised with all the critizism.
very good summation of the car, especially if they finished designing the car. It's too simple in the front. Maybe if they based this for a hydrogen concept, or even production car, I would like it... But I as well as many others don't believe it is fit for Bond...It's lazy design.
![]()
![]()
Admittedly, the rear is nice. Not groundbreaking, but nice.
On the other hand, the greenhouse and side profile are basically the same old schtick Aston has been pushing all these years. Yes, there's not much you can do to play with that shape, but they could attempt to do more than this. I applaud moving away from the current headlight-grille relation, but that Aston grille now looks tacked onto the front end of a Ferrari, with no rhyme or reason given for its shape. Like an open gash in the bodywork.
The greenhouse looks very "concept-car-ish"... if we're talking concepts from the 90's. Hello... play with the glass a little. More light. More personality. Well.. more than this:
![]()
(Pissed off basking shark)
Much as I am loathe to, I'll cite Zagato's take as a way to incorporate required Aston styling cues into a next generation model:
![]()
Ye gods, yes, it's weird, but at least they're thinking about how to work around that grille. Aston? Try harder.
As it is, the Merc AMG GT that shares engines with this is a more engaging and interesting design.
![]()
Much more playful, even in that same gray tone.
Personally, the DB10 is not an ugly car. The shape alone guarantees attractiveness... but there are a lot of cars with attractive shapes out there. What the DB10 needs is a distinctive face. That, it doesn't have, sadly. Aston have gone out of their way to get out of the rut they're in, stylistically, and they've lost their distinctiveness.
"It's lazy design"
Yet nobody seems to complain about that with Volkswagen or Opel or Mazda.
The problem is that the new Vanquish doesn't fit the tone of the films. It looks good, but it's not particularly subtle - it's all about raw power, a wolf in shepherd's clothing. And the original Vanquish casts a dark pall over the franchise; to many, it represents everything that was wrong with Die Another Day, when the over-the-top qualities reached critical mass and very nearly killed the franchise.I kind of wish they just stuck Bond in a new Vanquish.
Ah yes I forgot the DBS used in the 2 of the last 3 bond films was as subtle as being hit in the face with a brick and the DB5 could easily be lost in a tesco car park.The problem is that the new Vanquish doesn't fit the tone of the films. It looks good, but it's not particularly subtle - it's all about raw power, a wolf in shepherd's clothing. And the original Vanquish casts a dark pall over the franchise; to many, it represents everything that was wrong with Die Another Day, when the over-the-top qualities reached critical mass and very nearly killed the franchise.
Ah, makes sense then. I haven't read any articles about it?Maybe because it is a rebodied Vantage?
Ah, makes sense then. I haven't read any articles about it?
It is not based on the new architecture or built around the new Mercedes-AMG engines that future Aston Martins will feature, but instead around the existing V8 Vantage package. So ignore the DB10 name – this is not the car to follow the V12-engined, two plus two DB9. There’s only space for Daniel Craig and one passenger in the DB10.