Aston Martin DB10 for new Bond film

  • Thread starter Leicht
  • 226 comments
  • 16,450 views
DBten-web-news.jpg


Am i the only one who's seeing a bit of this, with a roof?


2010+Alfa+Romeo+2uettottanta+Concept.jpg
But with the Alfa badging and styling cues, and wheels, it looks 20 times better than the DB10.
 
I would say that is the influence of the film production. They have really been aiming to have a very grounded Bond, and cars like the original Vanquish were just too ostentatious. They obviously want an Aston, but they don't want something that sticks out like a sore thumb. After all, this is a Bond who will drive Fords and Volvos and - supposedly - Fiats to blend in if need be.

Considering how the car was designed for the movie, that makes sense. Still, in terms of wanting a more realistic approach, the idea of a spy driving a luxury grand tourer is unrealistic in the very first place though. They could have just chosen to completely forget about it.

But...I suppose it's a mutually beneficial partnership for both Aston Martin and the James Bond franchise. A lot of people buy into the notion of Bond driving an Aston Martin, and that also helps maintain the attractiveness of Aston Martin's cars. Also, in some cases, Bond's required to blend in with the rich and he needs something rather glamorous for the job. I guess an Aston Martin of which pizzazz is slightly watered-down, will provide a sense of balance.

Actually, I was wondering if Aston Martin would survive without the James Bond connection. Despite being charismatically stylish, their cars were rarely leaders in terms of performance.
 
Am I the only one seeing a lot of Mercedes-AMG GT in the side profile? Especially towards the rear.

I kind of wish they just stuck Bond in a new Vanquish. Not a fan of this DB10.
 
E28
Am I the only one seeing a lot of Mercedes-AMG GT in the side profile? Especially towards the rear.

I kind of wish they just stuck Bond in a new Vanquish. Not a fan of this DB10.

Not neccessarely the AMG GT, but it reminded me of a F - Type
 
Considering how the car was designed for the movie, that makes sense. Still, in terms of wanting a more realistic approach, the idea of a spy driving a luxury grand tourer is unrealistic in the very first place though.
I always liked that old joke talking about how they gave Bond's DB5 a revolving licence plate so he could evade notice, then he drove it around some piss poor Eastern European hellhole for half of Goldfinger.
 
I think it's quite a beautiful design. I also think it looks quite reserved, yet sharp and well tailored like a Savile Row suit.
This is soo much better than a DB9, but size wise - i really hope this design influences the next Vantage, as the proportions look spot on for it.
 
"Oh, and remember Mr Bond, if you happen to chase some terrorists around the Nürburgring press this to set your suspension, this to set traction control... this to set stability control, and this to get better throttle response. I think that was all."

@3:25
 
Out of curiosity, is Ian Callum still designing for Aston Martin? Would explain the Spectre a lot, imo.

As far as I know, he hasn't since they went solo. It's been Marek Reichman for quite a long time now, since at least the V8 Vantage debut.

I like it. It doesn't look quite finished, and a bespoke car is one of the most conspicuous forms of transportation one could pick, but it's different from their current design language, which everybody complains about.
 
That DB10 looks really, really good. I'm surprised with all the critizism.

It's lazy design.

2014-aston-martin-db9_100442425_l.jpg

Aston-Martin-DB10-Front-Three-Quarter-e1417707100993.jpg

Admittedly, the rear is nice. Not groundbreaking, but nice.

On the other hand, the greenhouse and side profile are basically the same old schtick Aston has been pushing all these years. Yes, there's not much you can do to play with that shape, but they could attempt to do more than this. I applaud moving away from the current headlight-grille relation, but that Aston grille now looks tacked onto the front end of a Ferrari, with no rhyme or reason given for its shape. Like an open gash in the bodywork.

The greenhouse looks very "concept-car-ish"... if we're talking concepts from the 90's. Hello... play with the glass a little. More light. More personality. Well.. more than this:


rm5mffbzbpg9cznlvzzb.jpg

(Pissed off basking shark)

Much as I am loathe to, I'll cite Zagato's take as a way to incorporate required Aston styling cues into a next generation model:



aston-martin-dbs-coupe-zagato-centennial-concept-photo-527864-s-1280x782.jpg

Ye gods, yes, it's weird, but at least they're thinking about how to work around that grille. Aston? Try harder.

As it is, the Merc AMG GT that shares engines with this is a more engaging and interesting design.
2016-mercedes-amg-gt-s-edition-1-front-three-quarter-view-2.jpg


Much more playful, even in that same gray tone.

Personally, the DB10 is not an ugly car. The shape alone guarantees attractiveness... but there are a lot of cars with attractive shapes out there. What the DB10 needs is a distinctive face. That, it doesn't have, sadly. Aston have gone out of their way to get out of the rut they're in, stylistically, and they've lost their distinctiveness.
 
It's lazy design.

2014-aston-martin-db9_100442425_l.jpg

Aston-Martin-DB10-Front-Three-Quarter-e1417707100993.jpg

Admittedly, the rear is nice. Not groundbreaking, but nice.

On the other hand, the greenhouse and side profile are basically the same old schtick Aston has been pushing all these years. Yes, there's not much you can do to play with that shape, but they could attempt to do more than this. I applaud moving away from the current headlight-grille relation, but that Aston grille now looks tacked onto the front end of a Ferrari, with no rhyme or reason given for its shape. Like an open gash in the bodywork.

The greenhouse looks very "concept-car-ish"... if we're talking concepts from the 90's. Hello... play with the glass a little. More light. More personality. Well.. more than this:


rm5mffbzbpg9cznlvzzb.jpg

(Pissed off basking shark)

Much as I am loathe to, I'll cite Zagato's take as a way to incorporate required Aston styling cues into a next generation model:



aston-martin-dbs-coupe-zagato-centennial-concept-photo-527864-s-1280x782.jpg

Ye gods, yes, it's weird, but at least they're thinking about how to work around that grille. Aston? Try harder.

As it is, the Merc AMG GT that shares engines with this is a more engaging and interesting design.
2016-mercedes-amg-gt-s-edition-1-front-three-quarter-view-2.jpg


Much more playful, even in that same gray tone.

Personally, the DB10 is not an ugly car. The shape alone guarantees attractiveness... but there are a lot of cars with attractive shapes out there. What the DB10 needs is a distinctive face. That, it doesn't have, sadly. Aston have gone out of their way to get out of the rut they're in, stylistically, and they've lost their distinctiveness.
very good summation of the car, especially if they finished designing the car. It's too simple in the front. Maybe if they based this for a hydrogen concept, or even production car, I would like it... But I as well as many others don't believe it is fit for Bond...

Maybe the sounds will make up for it...

maybe.
 
"It's lazy design"

Yet nobody seems to complain about that with Volkswagen or Opel or Mazda. Granted, you pay much more for an Aston, however I think that going for a certain design language gere isn't wrong and (for me personally) even appreciated, because the Vanquish sure is a pretty thing
 
"It's lazy design"

Yet nobody seems to complain about that with Volkswagen or Opel or Mazda.

I do. All the time.

I think that the Beetle is rather nice in person, after being turned off by photos, because they fixed many of the issues of... lazy design... present in the first generation New Beetle. But aside from that, the rest of the line-up suffers from a sort of corporate same-ness. Like Aston, they thrive on projecting that restrained, understated look compared to their competitors, but some models take that too far. That said, I like the Golf, too. I think the red accent up front is a nice touch in the dreary black and chrome world of design accents.

I think the 6 is a more engaging and adventurous design than any current Aston. The rest... well... Mazda needs to be a bit more adventurous with their design language. They've gone all Porsche. They found something that worked well on the 6, so now they're putting it on everything. Which is wrong. And by the looks of the upcoming 2 and CX3, it's going to get worse.

Opel... we don't have that here... but looking it up here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opel#Current_model_range

They have several different design directions going on, and some of them are rather nice.

Chevrolet, on the other hand, are too focused on plastering the same Big Arse Grille on everything from the Suburban to the Spark. Pity the Spark.
 
E28
I kind of wish they just stuck Bond in a new Vanquish.
The problem is that the new Vanquish doesn't fit the tone of the films. It looks good, but it's not particularly subtle - it's all about raw power, a wolf in shepherd's clothing. And the original Vanquish casts a dark pall over the franchise; to many, it represents everything that was wrong with Die Another Day, when the over-the-top qualities reached critical mass and very nearly killed the franchise.

The appeal of the DB10 lies in the way that is is quite subdued. It is a car that is unmistakably an Aston Martin, but it doesn't feel the need to stand out. You notice it in the periphery of your vision, but you don't stop and stare. It has that incognito quality about it, as if you are aware of it as it passes by, but then you wonder if you just saw it once it's gone.

But that doesn't matter. Only ten of them are being built, and none of them are being sold - they're all being used for filming Spectre. At this point, it's believed that the DB10 will feature in scenes shot in Austria, possibly on the Ötztel Glacier Road. The general consensus among fans is that the setting is evocative of On Her Majesty's Secret Service, so it's possible that the DB10 was literally designed to capture a particular feeling in a single specific setting.
 
Like the Vantage, it's tail is too short for my taste, other than that, yeah, it looks like an un-licensed Asto knock-off from a computer game, but not ugly.
 
The problem is that the new Vanquish doesn't fit the tone of the films. It looks good, but it's not particularly subtle - it's all about raw power, a wolf in shepherd's clothing. And the original Vanquish casts a dark pall over the franchise; to many, it represents everything that was wrong with Die Another Day, when the over-the-top qualities reached critical mass and very nearly killed the franchise.
Ah yes I forgot the DBS used in the 2 of the last 3 bond films was as subtle as being hit in the face with a brick and the DB5 could easily be lost in a tesco car park.
 
Ah, makes sense then. I haven't read any articles about it?

It is not based on the new architecture or built around the new Mercedes-AMG engines that future Aston Martins will feature, but instead around the existing V8 Vantage package. So ignore the DB10 name – this is not the car to follow the V12-engined, two plus two DB9. There’s only space for Daniel Craig and one passenger in the DB10.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/luxury/motoring/54172/bonds-aston-martin-db10-unveiled.html
 
Back