Because it so simple to run a background check on a person fleeing a country whose government is collapsing? Immigration checks are time consuming when the countries involved aren't in anarchy, and basically impossible when they are. So how exactly are they suppose to make that work?
And I've noticed the view in Europe is more "assimilate" into our culture rather than a fusion. The French seem particularly focused on this and it just seems a bit weird as an American. We've had huge amounts of immigration since the start of the country and there has certainly been a fusion of cultures over time, albeit regional as result of the countries size. So is it just a history thing, with the various European countries and culture having deeper roots?
As for the Christianity vs Islam thing, I'm not even sure where to start on that rambling of rhetorical questions.
Look at how the Dutch people will vote for the PVV of Wilders in March (projected 40% already), and who knows German people might be inspired and find the will to do the same.I think the only party who really would put a stop to this whole immigration mess (closing borders, etc) would be the AFD as the biggest right-winged one, but unless they somehow get more than 50% of the votes they won't do anything at all, since none other party would join a coalition with them.
21 years old? Bloody hell, that's young.Apparently they've found a ID belonging to a 21 year old Tunisian in the truck and now he is the prime suspect.
The Pattern of when IS gets huge defeats that they do domestic terrorism is looking like their strategy though, all the big attacks that have happened in the last few years have came after devastating losses for them in the Middle east.21 years old? Bloody hell, that's young.
Unfortunately I feel like we're getting to the point where nothing can really be done to prevent this. Any sharp reaction from the western world would simply inspire nutjobs who want any excuse to cause chaos and give more fuel to the division between cultures. What's worse, typical bomb-based attacks aren't the choice of these imbeciles these days - simple transport devices can be just as deadly, if not more so, and easier obtained with little to no risk in doing so.
Worth considering, why wouldn't ISIS claim responsibility? generates fear and unrest even if it wasn't actually them who carried out the attack. Claiming responsibility means literally zero until previous history with the group can be confirmed (if that's even possible).
Yes! I'm extremely happy the west has evolved out of its misogynistic and fanatic religious dark era, that was one extremely important step towards the modern, progressive society we enjoy living in right now. But now you suggest to adapt to certain cultures which have a value system and laws very similar to that we have thankfully evolved out of? That kind of regression would be absolutely devastating. Adapting to a weaker culture weakens society as a whole.It wasn't too long ago that Western culture put women very clearly below men. Of course, it still does but not to the same extent you see in some Islamic states, but that is besides the point. The point is your sense of cultural superiority is removed from the reality of relatively recent history and even the current situations in Western countries.
Radical Islam (or pure Islam), will never want a reform of their religion. According to them the truth of god and the laws one needs to abide to were written down 1300 years ago (so go figure), and it is not to be altered by any means.Yes! I'm extremely happy the west has evolved out of its misogynistic and fanatic religious dark era, that was one extremely important step towards the modern, progressive society we enjoy living in right now. But now you suggest to adapt to certain cultures which have a value system and laws very similar to that we have thankfully evolved out of? That kind of regression would be absolutely devastating.
Ah look, they are protecting the privacy of the new suspect:
Don't you think it is now of utmost importance that the public can identify this man? I mean more important than being 'correct' again?Which is reasonable. A person is innocent until proven to be otherwise. Germany, being a civilised country, respects privacy - unlike the so called civilised country I live in where the daily fail can do what was posted directly above your post.
Don't you think it's likely that EVERY young Muslim man is not already under suspicion by the public now? It is up to the security services to find him.Don't you think it is now of utmost importance that the public can identify this man? I mean more important than being 'correct' again?
What kind of an argument is that now? They are looking for one particular suspect, not every young Muslim man...Don't you think it's likely that EVERY young Muslim man is not already under suspicion by the public now? It is up to the security services to find him.
Oh come off it mate. You understand human nature as well as anyone else. He's a Suspect. What was that I posted before? Innocent until PROVEN otherwise.What kind of an argument is that now? They are looking for one particular suspect, not every young Muslim man...
A suspect on the run. It seems counter intuitive to protect someone's identity when you are trying to find him/warn the public.Oh come off it mate. You understand human nature as well as anyone else. He's a Suspect. What was that I posted before? Innocent until PROVEN otherwise.
Yeah and he'll stay innocent until proven otherwise, but seeing he 'might be' a an armed terrorist on the loose, it would be beneficial if the German public was allowed to see his bloody eyes.Oh come off it mate. You understand human nature as well as anyone else. He's a Suspect. What was that I posted before? Innocent until PROVEN otherwise.
Bollocks. I'd like to see some sources that Western culture very clearly puts women below men.It wasn't too long ago that Western culture put women very clearly below men. Of course, it still does but not to the same extent you see in some Islamic states, but that is besides the point.
Sadly, we are living in different times - and the nature of the threat posed by someone who has already committed mass murder, is armed, and who is possibly prepared to die rather than face justice means that the old-fashioned approach doesn't really apply. As has been seen already in Belgium, jihadists who are facing imminent arrest are a very serious threat to innocent life, and so it is reasonable to waive the usual formalities and make people aware of who the suspect is in a case specifically like this. In fact, there would be serious questions about why the police didn't raise the alarm in this case if they had credible information about the likely suspect.Oh come off it mate. You understand human nature as well as anyone else. He's a Suspect. What was that I posted before? Innocent until PROVEN otherwise.
Bollocks. I'd like to see some sources that Western culture very clearly puts women below men.
That's not evidence that Western culture puts women clearly below men. Wage gaps exist for many reasons that have nothing to do with equality of opportunity.
Well they didn't exactly say get this guilty man, they said suspect.Oh come off it mate. You understand human nature as well as anyone else. He's a Suspect. What was that I posted before? Innocent until PROVEN otherwise.
A pay gap doesn't prove anything, Equal opportunity doesn't equal the same outcome.
That's not evidence that Western culture puts women clearly below men. Wage gaps exist for many reasons that have nothing to do with equality of opportunity.
Like?Of course it is.
Like?
No, it isn't.Of course it is.
As has been said already, though, there are economic, historic and sociological reasons that explain why there is (still) a difference in pay between men and women in the UK, but equal pay, rights, opportunities etc. has been part of UK law since the 1970s. Arguably, despite the actual difference in pay that still exists between men and women, I'd say that the 'culture' was very much in favour of equal pay for equal work, and has been for many, many years in the UK.Like the fact that in the UK, which is unless i'm mistaken part of 'Western Culture', the average wage for women is 9.5% lower than it is for men. And that's taking into account the fact that a higher percentage of high paid jobs are taken by men and a higher percentage of low-wage jobs are taken by women and also that women are more likely to work part-time.
Does it take into fact of experience? and show me a study that includes the time spent working between the two, the link you provided didn't do that.Like the fact that in the UK, which is unless i'm mistaken part of 'Western Culture', the average wage for women is 9.5% lower than it is for men. And that's taking into account the fact that a higher percentage of high paid jobs are taken by men and a higher percentage of low-wage jobs are taken by women and also that women are more likely to work part-time.
No, it isn't.
The suspect, uncensored, courtesy of the Daily Mail:
The Police searched for him nonpublicly since Tuesday i guess, after news broke the search is now public. I guess there are reasons why law enforcement doesn't want to involve the public, like when an swift arrest might be possible and might be spoiled by public news -- so the public search indicates they aren't on to something concrete right now.Sadly, we are living in different times - and the nature of the threat posed by someone who has already committed mass murder, is armed, and who is possibly prepared to die rather than face justice means that the old-fashioned approach doesn't really apply. As has been seen already in Belgium, jihadists who are facing imminent arrest are a very serious threat to innocent life, and so it is reasonable to waive the usual formalities and make people aware of who the suspect is in a case specifically like this. In fact, there would be serious questions about why the police didn't raise the alarm in this case if they had credible information about the likely suspect.