Arlene wossername is now on a "charm offensive". She even said the L-word the other day, probably through splintering teeth.
While effectively saying 'please respect our views, while we continue to vote to ensure you don't have the same fundemental rights as us'.
More on topic, I'm still surprised that people are surprised that the EU is sticking to it's guns with regard to the UK effectively having three options. 1) hard brexits, no deal at all, 2) abandon Article 50 and rejoin, or 3) a deal that will leave the UK in a weaker position that it was as a member.
The EU has to be honest been clear and consistent from day 1 that these are the only three options, and that the leave with a deal one was always going to leave the UK in a weaker position (as from the EU perspective anything else would be stupid).
The simple reason that the UKs proposals are rebuffed is that we keep going to the EU with either nothing or options that would give us a better deal that we had now.
Any of these three options 'works' for the EU, and the end result of this is a clear change in attitudes from most EU citizens about any thoughts of leaving.
Now the Euro is a different matter, but opinions on that are unlikely to sway the rest into giving in to the UK and harming the whole.
Brexits will hurt the UK more than the EU in options 1 and 3, but that was always going to be the case and the EU has been consistently clear on that from day 1 (unlike the Leave fairy tales that were never going to pass). The simple truth is that the UK was never negotiating from a position of strength, we need the EU more than they need us and they have far more experience and skill at these kinds of negotiations than the UK has.