There's a ton of 'em around my age...
...so do you qualify for having a 'meaningful life' ?
There's a ton of 'em around my age...
Not as much I'd like it to be. Maybe meaningful is a word too far - fulfilled is closer to what I mean. Can't blame my own shortcomings on politics, though. I know where I messed up in life....so do you qualify for having a 'meaningful life' ?
This is how we are at least partly represented in Europe... shameful
0-Godwin's Law in 2.3 seconds... Impressive
0-Godwin's Law in 2.3 seconds... Impressive
Godwin's Law doesn't apply if the comparison is appropriate and valid; it is, however, commonly invoked and abused to denounce every comparison to Nazis or argument as hyperbole.
That said, I hadn't ever seen that image of the NSDAP members turning their back on the Reichstag and I would like to know more about it.
It's a pretty common style of protest, and I'm fairly sure that the Londoners who turned their backs on Xi Jinping during his visit were not invoking the spirit of Hitler.
The warning within Godwin's Law is that even a valid comparison to the Nazis weakens the argument because the Nazis did an awful lot of nasty stuff, much of it beyond the capabilities even of a modern western government, and so the people who might defend the party being compared to the Nazis are gifted the perfectly valid arguments "Well, the Brexit Party aren't racist, they aren't militaristic, they don't want to put people in death camps" etc etc and one instantly has to concede that the comparison is weak.Godwin's Law doesn't apply if the comparison is appropriate and valid; it is, however, commonly invoked and abused to denounce every comparison to Nazis or argument as hyperbole.
That said, I hadn't ever seen that image of the NSDAP members turning their back on the Reichstag and I would like to know more about it.
All Godwin's Law says is that the longer and more heated an internet debate becomes, the more likely somebody is to drop a comparison to Hitler.The warning within Godwin's Law is that even a valid comparison to the Nazis weakens the argument because the Nazis did an awful lot of nasty stuff, much of it beyond the capabilities even of a modern western government, and so the people who might defend the party being compared to the Nazis are gifted the perfectly valid arguments "Well, the Brexit Party aren't racist, they aren't militaristic, they don't want to put people in death camps" etc etc and one instantly has to concede that the comparison is weak.
I'm not trying to invalidate your comparison - the pictures speak for themselves. It merely made me chuckle that Godwin's Law had technically been invoked so quickly, even before there was a discussion. I didn't mean it out of disagreement if that makes sense.All Godwin's Law says is that the longer and more heated an internet debate becomes, the more likely somebody is to drop a comparison to Hitler.
No validation or invalidation is included. There's a visual comparison between the Reichstag protest and the scene in the Parliament building. To invoke the absence of pencil moustaches and brown shirts is missing the point of the joke somewhat. Given the behaviour of Brexit MEPs in the past I'd be surprised if they wouldn't just laugh off such a comparison themselves.
Some Brexiteers are making comparisons online to the Lib Dem's "Bollocks To Brexit" slogan but let's face it, it's not a very Hitlery move.
I believe that’s already part of Labours manifesto..."Bollocks to Judaism", the latest line from Hugo Boss, inspired by Joseph Goebbels...
The warning within Godwin's Law is that even a valid comparison to the Nazis weakens the argument because the Nazis did an awful lot of nasty stuff, much of it beyond the capabilities even of a modern western government, and so the people who might defend the party being compared to the Nazis are gifted the perfectly valid arguments
I believe that’s already part of Labours manifesto...
You paint a pretty picture @Ten... you know who also used to paint pictures? Adolf Hitler!No, that is not what Godwin's Law says. If you've inferred that then that's fine, but it isn't what it says. Can I point out that revisionist reinterpretation of established texts is exactly the sort of thing that Goebbels liked?![]()
Aye, agreed, when I said "the warning within Godwin's law" I meant that's a warning I take from it. Any Nazi-esque regime that actually wants to come to power in Europe probably has a fair amount of "look we're not Nazis-ing" to do to achieve it.No, that is not what Godwin's Law says. If you've inferred that then that's fine, but it isn't what it says. Can I point out that revisionist reinterpretation of established texts is exactly the sort of thing that Goebbels liked?![]()
Not Kevin Magnussen?Finns aren't aryan. Of the two current drivers I guess Hamilton, being half brit and therefore of saxon ancestry, is the most aryan there.
Finns aren't Aryan? Racists are picky.
National Socialism: because Finns don't have blue eyes and blond hair, but the Japanese do.Finland fought against Germany in WW2. Bottas would not be a favoured party son and Rosberg, being born of Finnish parentage, would have to hide his ancestry.
This is a weird conversation, even by GTP standards.![]()
Finns aren't Aryan? Racists are picky.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't their something of a puzzle with regard to the origins of the Finns? Something to do with the Urals?Indeed. Much was made of whether or not Finnish forebears were purely of the volkswanderung, the decision was that they weren't.
You living in an alternative world? Finland fought on the side of the Germans in Russia. They didn't go any further than regain the land they'd lost to the russians though if I recall.Finland fought against Germany in WW2. Bottas would not be a favoured party son and Rosberg, being born of Finnish parentage, would have to hide his ancestry.
This is a weird conversation, even by GTP standards.![]()
You living in an alternative world? Finland fought on the side of the Germans in Russia. They didn't go any further than regain the land they'd lost to the russians though if I recall.
So I change my stance; Bottas and especially Rosberg would be favoured party sons.![]()
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't their something of a puzzle with regard to the origins of the Finns? Something to do with the Urals?
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't their something of a puzzle with regard to the origins of the Finns? Something to do with the Urals?
Yes, you're right. Total brain fade on my part.I misremembered them fighting with Evil Group A against Evil Group B.
So I change my stance; Bottas and especially Rosberg would be favoured party sons.![]()