Britain - The Official Thread

  • Thread starter Ross
  • 13,359 comments
  • 616,734 views

How will you vote in the 2024 UK General Election?

  • Conservative Party

    Votes: 2 6.9%
  • Green Party

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Labour Party

    Votes: 14 48.3%
  • Liberal Democrats

    Votes: 2 6.9%
  • Other (Wales/Scotland/Northern Ireland)

    Votes: 1 3.4%
  • Other Independents

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other Parties

    Votes: 2 6.9%
  • Spoiled Ballot

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Will Not/Cannot Vote

    Votes: 8 27.6%

  • Total voters
    29
  • Poll closed .

Cant Speak Nathan Fillion GIF
 
"I am truly sorry and very humbled."

(30 seconds later)

"I have changed the ministerial code so I never have to be sorry or humbled again."

Dictatorship.
 
Last edited:
As the World burns Johnson is on the case solving the most pressing issues of our times.


It will win the votes of a few Brexit supporting gammons - got to keep the base happy.
 
Last edited:
what does it actually achieve?
I know its set to be optional, but 'm sure they'd be some finacial costs to retailers changing their weighting system. People under 40 won't understand pounds and ounces and won't want to, or shouldn't have to, learn them. 16 ounces in a pound and 14 pounds in a stone. No body needs that in their life.

I mean we already kind of do use it when it comes to the weight of a person. Just like we still use miles rather than kilometers for travel distances (and speed) when travelling by vehicle at least, and a person's height is generally still feet and inches rather than centimeters, a person's weight is generally accepted as measured in stones and ounces. But anyone millenial or younger are going to be baffled by trying to buy food stuff in pounds and ounces.
 
I know its set to be optional, but 'm sure they'd be some finacial costs to retailers changing their weighting system. People under 40 won't understand pounds and ounces and won't want to, or shouldn't have to, learn them. 16 ounces in a pound and 14 pounds in a stone. No body needs that in their life.

I mean we already kind of do use it when it comes to the weight of a person. Just like we still use miles rather than kilometers for travel distances (and speed) when travelling by vehicle at least, and a person's height is generally still feet and inches rather than centimeters, a person's weight is generally accepted as measured in stones and ounces. But anyone millenial or younger are going to be baffled by trying to buy food stuff in pounds and ounces.

Yup, we already have plenty of freedom and experience to use either in our day to day lives, this is an empty offering. Who really buys by weight anyway these days, I'd say the majority don't, because of the amount of stuff that comes pre-packed.

I'd almost like to start a social media campaign, "Johnson's IMPERIAL plans see petrol price SKYROCKET!! £8.40 per Gallon!!".

On the back of the debate about the crown on pint glasses, I'm surprised there's not been more talk about UKCA marking.
 
I know its set to be optional
1653911497351.png


It's never been prohibited to include Imperial weights and measures on a product. The EU regulations make it mandatory to use metric (actually SI, which I'll cover in a second) weights and measures, with any other units included for information only.


Legally cars must have their power displayed in kW (SI) and torque in Nm (also SI), but most manufacturers only include this in official documentation and more prominently market them with PS ("metric") and Nm (SI) - some holdouts also use hp/bhp (interchangeably, despite one being scalar and the other a vector) and very, very rarely lbft.

They do this because the numbers for PS and Nm are bigger, even though PS is measured in kgm/s so should have torque in kgm.


200PS = 196hp = 146kW
20.4kgm = 147lbft = 200Nm

PS is a metric unit rather than an SI unit, because it's a conversion of an imperial measure into metric units with a "round it to a less unpleasant number" fudge. Similarly kgm is metric rather than SI, because it doesn't use the right unit for force; kgm should actually be kgfm, meaning "kilograms-equivalent force", which is the amount of force a kilogram exerts under gravitational acceleration... and the unit for that is the Newton.

This still happens despite being a specific law since 1972. So long as the SI units appear in the official documentation, they can market it however they like.
 
To be honest I'm not really sure which units are metric and which are imperial. The only one I need to stop and think with is Fahrenheit. Pre-decimal currency also makes no sense, despite how many times my parents have tried to explain it to me.
 
Imperial measurements


Even the US doesn't use imperial; despite the similarities several of their weights and measurements are not the same as what people in Britain would think of as imperial.

'Global' Britain. Isolated, alone.
 
To be honest I'm not really sure which units are metric
Well... you shouldn't have any trouble with remembering that a "metre" is metric... :lol:
and which are imperial.
Generally if the measurements have entirely new words for subdivisions or multiples, it's Imperial (or, as @Liquid notes, "Standard" in the USA).

Foot -> Yard -> Furlong -> Mile = Imperial; Centimetre -> Metre -> Kilometre = Metric
Ounce -> Pound -> Stone = Imperial; Milligram -> Gram -> Kilogram = Metric
Fluid ounce -> Pint -> Gallon = Imperial; Millilitre -> Litre -> ... actually nothing, though you can use new prefixes, nobody does = Metric


For metric, metre, litre, gram are the ones you need to know. Everything distance, volume, or weight, is just micro (1/1000000)/milli (1/1000)/centi (1/100)/kilo (1000)/mega (1000000) of it.

Rarely used are deci (1/10), deka (10), and hecto (100)
 
It is infuriatingly stupid... what does it actually achieve?
It's also crazy to portray this as somehow a 'Brexit benefit', when the UK shifting to metric units had nothing to do with EU membership in the first place.

The trouble with 'moving away from metric' is that science, technology and the rest of the world use metric terms as standard, indeed standard notation in science uses 'standard units' or SI units, which the UK adopted well before it ever joined the EU, and no amount of Brexiteer bull**** will change the fact that the UK will need to keep using metric notation for most things indefinitely.

And, as for our beloved Imperial units - pints of milk/beer, feet and inches, pounds and stones etc., we use them routinely anyway, so I'm not sure what Boris is planning here other than another pointless soundbite.
 
I can't tell if you just have a taste for the latest fashion trends or if you're implying that when the cameras aren't looking the lizard people will teleport back to the mother ship.
 
I can't tell if you just have a taste for the latest fashion trends or if you're implying that when the cameras aren't looking the lizard people will teleport back to the mother ship.
Jubilee UAP phenomenon caught on multiple recordings from air and ground.

 
It's a herring gull - and it's fast because it's close to the camera, Dougal.

father-ted.gif

Which I suppose neatly knits together UAP idiocy and Birds Aren't Real idiocy into a giant Venn Diagram of Dumb.
 
Last edited:
It's a herring gull - and it's fast because it's close to the camera, Dougal.

father-ted.gif

Which I suppose neatly knits together UAP idiocy and Birds Aren't Real idiocy into a giant Venn Diagram of Dumb.
Since the phenomenon was captured both from below and from above, that rules out the bird explanation. The object cannot be closer to both cameras at the same time.
 
Last edited:
Since the phenomenon was captured both from below and from above, that rules out the bird explanation. The object cannot be closer to both cameras at the same time.
Of course it can. Incredible that both someone exceptionally stupid and some purportedly intelligent person can be confused by simple geometry in the exact same way.

Also the flapping wings are a giveaway. That and it being impossible to move in London without tripping over a gull or a skyrat.
 
Back