- 21,008
- NJ/USA
- Blitzbay
- Blitzbay
Don't worry, the PM is on it!
Now it will never happen again.
Don't worry, the PM is on it!
Don't worry, the PM is on it!
Now it will never happen again.
A better title for marketing would surely be "A BJ for BJ" ?Nope, Johnson will just get caught out making porn at work.
“Boris’s Johnson”
Quick! Time to do some investing then pin it on the bank for them making you do potentially illicit behavior!hmmm, Lloyds Bank have sent me an email at 6am this morning about the increase in interest rates... that hasn't been announced yet. 🤔
Me thinks they've jumped the gun, BofE won't he happy about that. Not that it's any surprise of course.
I appreciate the gumption; if there's one thing worse than a bunch of lying warmongers it's a bunch of liars so ineffective they couldn't monger fishThose bastards had me voting Labour for the first time in a quarter of a century after switching to the Lib Dems when Blair and W declared war on Iraq.
I was busy gaming and completely forgot to vote. That's the second time in all the years I've been able to vote. The previous time was deliberate.I do hope you all voted in the locals (if there was an election in your area)!
They're not dead, just pining. They could be back any time, just like the Black Death.
Why is that a consideration?And when we sell that palace
The implication by the author being that having a building of such value wasn't required, and that it would be better that the value of the building was distributed amongst those who need it most, unless I misunderstood the sentiments behind it. My point was that once that money runs out, where else do we find the money, what else needs to be sold?Why is that a consideration?
Just my take on it, and reason for posting it, was to highlight how ludicrous the ceremony in is, especially in the current climate, and also to demonstrate the extreme descrepency in wealth between the Monarchy and their subjects... not really as a potential solution for the current problem.The implication by the author being that having a building of such value wasn't required, and that it would be better that the value of the building was distributed amongst those who need it most, unless I misunderstood the sentiments behind it. My point was that once that money runs out, where else do we find the money, what else needs to be sold?
Re: Dorries - I don't know what "lethal aid" is but I suspect the only lesson these arrogant swine will learn from this is "don't get caught next time".