Obelisk
Premium
- 9,765
- United States
- RMedia_Obelisk
Ditto. I hope it lives up to what VAG is saying it'll do.Grandea GTROn topic: I'm liking it much more this time, loads better than the Veyron.
Ditto. I hope it lives up to what VAG is saying it'll do.Grandea GTROn topic: I'm liking it much more this time, loads better than the Veyron.
Frz - see what Dan said above.
I made the post before any other posts actually comes in. Only appears after i click post.Let's not provoke him any further, please.
On topic: I'm liking it much more this time, loads better than the Veyron.
Anyways, back to the Chiron...
The more I see it the more I like it as it doesn't look as bloated as the Veyron.
If memory serves right, the Veyron SuperSport was around 4,000 pounds.I wonder how heavy it will be compared to the Veyron?
I wonder how heavy it will be compared to the Veyron?
you americans need to face the facts. ALL american made cars are garbage.
Hey 2 questions:
1. Will the engine be the same as the Veyron but tuned up (ala Huracan to Gallardo)? If my memory served right the VGT also has the same engine tuned up.
2. Will this Bugatti finally got its handling better? I know its top speed foccused but it could be better. The Veyron was an understeer mess.
TIL the Veyron handles badly because video games...
What Video Games? Top Gear compared Veyron to Zonda F. The less powered Zonda F wins for obvious reasons.TIL the Veyron handles badly because video games...
What Video Games? Top Gear compared Veyron to Zonda F. The less powered Zonda F wins for obvious reasons.
I dont say its the most understeery car in existence. I just say compared to the other supercars, Veyron is more understeer. Which is actually make sense technically. Its not particularly lightweight and it slightly lacks a downforce akin to the other hypercars (to attain max top speed).
Obviously that doesnt makes the Veyron a bad car. If it shows an inprovement in handling in the Chiron then congrats. If not then its still a good car. Its supposed to be the fastest car in kmh/mph anyways, not the fastest in Nurburgring or other tracks.
Then explain why the Super Sport then went on to be over 2 seconds faster round the TG track than the regular Veyron.
Looking at the spy shot, it looks a bit thinner than Veyron. It looks like a car than handles better than the bloated Veyron imo.
Then explain why the Super Sport then went on to be nearly 2 seconds faster round the TG track than the regular Veyron.
Because it had more power and weighed less than the regular Veyron. 💡
*Not to mention the last corners were resurfaced prior to the SS being run around the track, allowing Stig to hold more speed through the final complex.
And the white Veyron 16.4 was a private vehicle. Guilt, etc
So TG times are as irrelevant as any other lap time
Yeah, but on real roads (because let's be real, how many hypercar owners actually use them on tracks?) the Veyron is a lot more usable than the Pagani, and I think I'd prefer a safety net than irrelevant Top Gear Test Track runs.What Video Games? Top Gear compared Veyron to Zonda F. The less powered Zonda F wins for obvious reasons.
I dont say its the most understeery car in existence. I just say compared to the other supercars, Veyron is more understeer. Which is actually make sense technically. Its not particularly lightweight and it slightly lacks a downforce akin to the other hypercars (to attain max top speed).
Obviously that doesnt makes the Veyron a bad car. If it shows an inprovement in handling in the Chiron then congrats. If not then its still a good car. Its supposed to be the fastest car in kmh/mph anyways, not the fastest in Nurburgring or other tracks.
Well not exactly releveant then, isnt it? Even the worst handling car can be usable on real road and everyday situations.Yeah, but on real roads (because let's be real, how many hypercar owners actually use them on tracks?) the Veyron is a lot more usable than the Pagani, and I think I'd prefer a safety net than irrelevant Top Gear Test Track runs.
So... are you agreeing with me? From the tone of the 1st part I'd say no, but the second part does.Well not exactly releveant then, isnt it? Even the worst handling car can be usable on real road and everyday situations.
In Veyron case, its brimming with luxury you expect from the most expensive production car. Pagani is more track foccused.
If you try to set a fastest lap on tracks like Nurburgring or other tracks that has many corners, no.So... are you agreeing with me? From the tone of the 1st part I'd say no, but the second part does.
Well to be fair i only said it looks smaller lol idk but in my eye it feels smaller. Maybe because the design is less curvy, more edgy ?It still has the same massive engine with all the same cooling requirements - only this time its likely to have some hybrid gubbins too. I can't see how it could possibly be any lighter or smaller, given what it has to squeeze in. The Veyron was a small car, all considered. It's a foot shorter than an Aventador.
I saw the Veyron out on Rodeo Drive. Those things are seriously small cars. They're heavier than they look in real life, to say the least.Well to be fair i only said it looks smaller lol idk but in my eye it feels smaller. Maybe because the design is less curvy, more edgy ?
Veyron was small ? I did not know that.
Well to be fair i only said it looks smaller lol idk but in my eye it feels smaller. Maybe because the design is less curvy, more edgy ?
Veyron was small ? I did not know that.
Well to be fair i only said it looks smaller lol idk but in my eye it feels smaller. Maybe because the design is less curvy, more edgy ?
Veyron was small ? I did not know that.
Whaaaat?They are surprisingly small in person.
I think it might be down to the aero packaging giving the impression that it looks smaller.