- 238
- United Kingdom
Last edited:
There have been some occasions where I have tested a car post-race and only under a 1-lap condition. As long as I saw 67% near the pit entrance, I would post it as ‘x-value-capable’. I’ve tried to be more stringent the last couple of days, but I’ve also found myself exiting the hairpin after 1.5 at 48% and ‘failing’ the test when in actual practice, the car passes in the end. In other words, I err more to the side of caution.Control question. Did you get 3 laps on FM6 and RH in dry conditions? I did not. But then I drive automatic transmission, and by that no short shifting.
(I did get 3 laps on Wet tires, with some lift and coast on one of the laps.)
Retested it today. It was very close, but it pulled 3 laps for me.Control question. Did you get 3 laps on FM6 and RH in dry conditions? I did not. But then I drive automatic transmission, and by that no short shifting.
(I did get 3 laps on Wet tires, with some lift and coast on one of the laps.)
Ok! I probably just drive uneconomical.Retested it today. It was very close, but it pulled 3 laps for me.
It's honestly AT. If you have the time to learn manual it's so much quicker. Your fuel goes further, you're quicker, it's more interactive.Ok! I probably just drive uneconomical.
Looks like our next move Magnus...It's honestly AT. If you have the time to learn manual it's so much quicker. Your fuel goes further, you're quicker, it's more interactive.
I drove AT since I started playing GT in GT5, made the switch about 3 weeks ago. Putting down the best times of my life.
As I often say, I am a beginner. And connected to this subject, I do not know how large percentage of the average players that run AT respective MT. Is there a view here from people with experience?Looks like our next move Magnus...
I'm hesitant in the middle of this process as I want to be able to test as an AT user would experience the car and it would skew my results if I tested some with AT and some with MT.
Looks like our next move Magnus...
I'm hesitant in the middle of this process as I want to be able to test as an AT user would experience the car and it would skew my results if I tested some with AT and some with MT.
As I often say, I am a beginner. And connected to this subject, I do not know how large percentage of the average players that run AT respective MT. Is there a view here from people with experience?
I think as a base for your project, it will have value to continue it with AT.
Then maybe later for some of the borderline cases see if MT add significant value.
(On a personal note, I will try to learn MT, next time I have a day to play. Currently I play an hour every second day sort of)
That’s not a bad idea. I’m willing to do 2 laps and in (as it usually means the car is very fast), but I doubt many people feel the same way, so the testing is somewhat of a moot point in those circumstances. Maybe I’ll dabble a bit on this cycle and see how it feels.You could switch to MT for cars you can't get 3 laps out of at FM6? (if you do want to start practicing MT.
There are cars that it's almost impossible to do Le Mans on without short shifting and MT. If you want to have those cars in your garage it might help you get them dialed in a bit easier? As long as you have cheap cars that can do it easily in AT you've given beginners a really good way in.
Took me about 500km to really start getting it. It's like changing your computer mouse or anything else, it takes a little time but it's worth persevering. If you're using a controller I think the fastest settings are MT, all assists off apart from ABS on default. I keep TCS on one because I'm a little baby though.
What are you getting for lap times?
Tested MT first time yesterday. Tested a car that with AT does not get 3 laps on LeMans. With MT it did.You could switch to MT for cars you can't get 3 laps out of at FM6? (if you do want to start practicing MT.
There are cars that it's almost impossible to do Le Mans on without short shifting and MT. If you want to have those cars in your garage it might help you get them dialed in a bit easier? As long as you have cheap cars that can do it easily in AT you've given beginners a really good way in.
Took me about 500km to really start getting it. It's like changing your computer mouse or anything else, it takes a little time but it's worth persevering. If you're using a controller I think the fastest settings are MT, all assists off apart from ABS on default. I keep TCS on one because I'm a little baby though.
I really appreciate your tune! I ended up running quite the hot lap!Tested MT first time yesterday. Tested a car that with AT does not get 3 laps on LeMans. With MT it did.
Will take some time to learn to do faster lap times. Maybe a lot of practice time.
It will be so easy to you with a little practice! It won't be long until you see your lap times come down!Tested MT first time yesterday. Tested a car that with AT does not get 3 laps on LeMans. With MT it did.
Will take some time to learn to do faster lap times. Maybe a lot of practice time.
Posted here.What are you getting for lap times?
Hello, if I may ask, what times did you get with this car/tune?Hyundai
Its just not good.
Wide Body/Wide Offset/Front A/Side A
View attachment 1180150View attachment 1180149View attachment 1180151
4:18 best lap and just under 33 overall. I'm willing to play with it some more as I feel there is some untapped potential there. I'll give your advice a try next chance I get.Hello, if I may ask, what times did you get with this car/tune?
Because it’s one of my favorites sleeper cars, not as fast as others but can do this race on 1 pit stop only, and that’s with heavy rain. You need full aero for downforce and stiffen the suspension a bit more. Also it sounds amazing.
View attachment 1181654
What I do is run FM6 the whole race and shift at 7000 rpm’s, again not as fast as others but steady and easy to drive. My tune is just 1PP below yours but I have less power, more downforce, stiffer suspension and a bit taller gearing.4:18 best lap and just under 33 overall. I'm willing to play with it some more as I feel there is some untapped potential there. I'll give your advice a try next chance I get.
Mazda
Its really fun, I just wish it would stay dry for 7 laps, just once, to see its true potential. Glad you enjoyed it!i can only describe this tune in two words...excitement and nervousness. thanks for sharing this i definitely enjoyed driving (and winning) inside the rx500 😍 😍 😍
why? do you have issue with it in the wet? i do find the handling of the rx500 in the wets very reasonable as long as im using intermidiates i can finish sarthe without problems.Its really fun, I just wish it would stay dry for 7 laps, just once, to see its true potential. Glad you enjoyed i
I played around with it quite a bit and no luck. I’m OK with gearing, but near useless when it comes to suspension. I reached out to myckol on Reddit, but he’s on vacation for a bit longer. If you would share your setup, I’ll happily give it a try.What I do is run FM6 the whole race and shift at 7000 rpm’s, again not as fast as others but steady and easy to drive. My tune is just 1PP below yours but I have less power, more downforce, stiffer suspension and a bit taller gearing.
Like you I’m not also an expert tuner but I too love to do this race with as different cars as I can.
Hope you have a great race with it.
No problems with the rain per se, but it slows you down considerably. I would love to see the overall time on a totally dry day.why? do you have issue with it in the wet? i do find the handling of the rx500 in the wets very reasonable as long as im using intermidiates i can finish sarthe without problems.
Is this worth driving?Wicked Fabrication
My first experience was a bit iffy, but I had made some pretty drastic alterations to the tune. When I set it back up closer to Pra’s spec (and put the wing on maybe), it went much better. IIRC, she will eat tires, hence the use of RH’s at the expense of PP. Getting caught on slicks in the rain made me want to pull my hair out though, if it looks like its going to get wet, just pit for tires. Otherwise, its a fantastic car/tune.Is this worth driving?
Heavy wets work really well. Yesterday I was playing on normal. It rained for 4 lapsMy first experience was a bit iffy, but I had made some pretty drastic alterations to the tune. When I set it back up closer to Pra’s spec (and put the wing on maybe), it went much better. IIRC, she will eat tires, hence the use of RH’s at the expense of PP. Getting caught on slicks in the rain made me want to pull my hair out though, if it looks like its going to get wet, just pit for tires. Otherwise, its a fantastic car/tune.
I believe it was this car that taught me a very important lesson about altering tunes in general. A little bit to suit personal taste is fine, but too much can turn a perfectly good tune into a nightmare. I have since tried to keep all tunes much closer to spec and stopped trying to chase theoretical numbers on the tuning sheets.