Circumcision.

  • Thread starter Carbonox
  • 292 comments
  • 18,591 views
It's something which this thread has made me aware of, yeah.



Well it would be a ridiculous reason for splitting up, but I've not heard of any guy getting dumped because they still have their foreskin.



I've known since one of my parents brought it up for some reason a couple of years before the medical thing I mentioned in my previous post. If I hadn't found out what it was by then, I reckon I would've found out after watching Meet the Fockers 9 years ago. :lol:


I had a friend who dumped her boyfriend because she never saw one before. She freaked out over it.
 
I had a friend who dumped her boyfriend because she never saw one before. She freaked out over it.

Again, clearly she's not worth being in a relationship. That's just as stupid as dumping a BF because he's an atheist, for instance.
 
I agree with that totally. But it was so out of the normal for her here in the states that I think she didn't know what to do.
 
The issue with Quranists is that its hard to decipher what God meant since it is written in poetic form. A sentence can mean one thing to a person and another thing to another person. It's true that Islam in itself does not demand circumcision or be punished, but the Prophet himself recommended it for one reason or another. Since Muslims hold the Prophets words to heart right after the Quran, hence the wide spread acceptance of circumcision.
 
I agree with that totally. But it was so out of the normal for her here in the states that I think she didn't know what to do.

Hah, like there was anything she had to do.

She obviously couldn't get her boyfriend excited enough because if she did she wouldn't have even been noticable. Either that or she is just talking rubbish.
 
Sex is plenty pleasureable for me, in fact I have no problem at all. I'm just saying it could have been even more pleasureable had I been left intact.

"Intact" makes it sound like your penis was removed.

Can you climax easily? Can you last long enough for your wife/gf to climax? Then you're getting everything out of sex (without adding anal, which you should do if you're worried about getting everything you can out of sex).

But I will never know because I was cut.

"Cut", makes it sound like your penis was removed. If you can climax and you can get her to climax easily, you're doing it right.

Also, I'm totally not into anal haha. And yes ther are times when my penis can be overly stimulated and its painful. But that is besides the point.

No it is exactly the point - because your so-called insensitive circumcised penis is capable of plenty of stimulation. More than you can handle. Also if you're not willing to try anal (I'm not, so I can't blame you), you're not really all that concerned with getting every last bit of enjoyment out of sex are you?

I actually find the pleasure from the shaft and more complete throughout more compared to the more confined feeling on the head and to be more enjoyable as what I get from the head is so strong that I literally keel over and cannot even touch it, especially after an orgasm. I guess wanting to restore it is more so to be like I should be rather than something I'm not. Putting it back the way it was and should have been.

Why? I think it's better circumcised.

I wasn't aware that tonsils were regularly removed if there were no complications with them. And my other comment added plenty to the discussion - perspective.

They are commonly removed preventatively out of concern for future complications.

Also, comparing male circumcision to the barbaric female circumcision is not perspective - it's pointless. The only similarity they share is the name and that it's between the legs. Otherwise it's night and day. There is a part of the penis that would be analogous to female circumcision, but it doesn't get removed in any culture (that I know of) so it's removal doesn't have a name (that I know of).

MÜLE_9242;7995215
Should be banned in all cases until age 18. No exceptions for any backwards religions, either.

Absolutely disgusting that parents would force this on their kids. The Penn and Teller: BS episode on this is quite informative.

I'd like to suggest to all uncircumcised adult males in this thread to strongly consider circumcision. I know, I know, you don't want anyone messing with your junk and pain in that region is a scary thought. Take it from someone who has had a piece of a testicle removed (don't worry, I have huge testicles so there's more than enough left) you can handle a snip on the skin.

Here's what you'll get when you circumcise:

- Potentially the ability to last longer in bed
- A more attractive penis (not that it's all that attractive a thing regardless)
- An easier penis to keep extremely clean throughout the day, which will translate to...
- An increased chance of your partner being willing to perform any acts that require a super-clean penis.

That's not to say that being uncircumcised is a problem. I'm sure you can handle all of the above just fine without circumcision, but let me say from the perspective of someone who is circumcised - I highly recommend it to every male.

(Note that I did not recommend that you circumcise your children)
 
Again, clearly she's not worth being in a relationship. That's just as stupid as dumping a BF because he's an atheist, for instance.

I don't really think those are comparable. One is a belief system, the other is a penis. Belief systems are at least an understandable thing to keep in mind when trying to build a relationship that could last your whole life.



But I do see your point and agree. It's a trivial thing to break up over.
 
Only someone who can clearly remember having a foreskin and tehn being circumcised really has an opinion worth considering.
 
"Intact" makes it sound like your penis was removed.

Can you climax easily? Can you last long enough for your wife/gf to climax? Then you're getting everything out of sex (without adding anal, which you should do if you're worried about getting everything you can out of sex).

Yes I can but I feel like it could have been better

"Cut", makes it sound like your penis was removed. If you can climax and you can get her to climax easily, you're doing it right.

Agreed

No it is exactly the point - because your so-called insensitive circumcised penis is capable of plenty of stimulation. More than you can handle. Also if you're not willing to try anal (I'm not, so I can't blame you), you're not really all that concerned with getting every last bit of enjoyment out of sex are you?

I hardly get any pleasure from the head unless I force it. Usually all comes from the shaft.

Why? I think it's better circumcised.



They are commonly removed preventatively out of concern for future complications.

Also, comparing male circumcision to the barbaric female circumcision is not perspective - it's pointless. The only similarity they share is the name and that it's between the legs. Otherwise it's night and day. There is a part of the penis that would be analogous to female circumcision, but it doesn't get removed in any culture (that I know of) so it's removal doesn't have a name (that I know of).



I'd like to suggest to all uncircumcised adult males in this thread to strongly consider circumcision. I know, I know, you don't want anyone messing with your junk and pain in that region is a scary thought. Take it from someone who has had a piece of a testicle removed (don't worry, I have huge testicles so there's more than enough left) you can handle a snip on the skin.

Here's what you'll get when you circumcise:

- Potentially the ability to last longer in bed
- A more attractive penis (not that it's all that attractive a thing regardless)
- An easier penis to keep extremely clean throughout the day, which will translate to...
- An increased chance of your partner being willing to perform any acts that require a super-clean penis.

That's not to say that being uncircumcised is a problem. I'm sure you can handle all of the above just fine without circumcision, but let me say from the perspective of someone who is circumcised - I highly recommend it to every male.

(Note that I did not recommend that you circumcise your children)
.
 
Only someone who can clearly remember having a foreskin and tehn being circumcised really has an opinion worth considering.

What's your opinion on suicide, then? Oh, wait... sorry... I guess you can't give a worthwhile opinion on that...
 
- A more attractive penis (not that it's all that attractive a thing regardless)

I think that's definitely an opinion matter. I don't personally see how a circumsized penis would look so much better.

- An easier penis to keep extremely clean throughout the day

Not really sure if this matters a whole lot. SoAp and water if it isn't clean enough.
 
Last edited:
Look, if Yahweh wants us males to sacrifice a bit of our skin to an old man wielding an X-acto knife, rather than having to make an arduous climb up a mountain, lie to our son, and have him sacrificed just to gain His Trust and a bountiful harvest, then saving 365 minutes a year in the shower is one of Judaism's better ideas.

And we get to have feast for it...Merry Bris-mas! I don't see the problem. :ill:

Carbonox
Not really sure if this matters a whole lot. Soup and water if it isn't clean enough.

I'll have the sandwich and salad, thanks.
 
I have to ask the question, how much skin do they actually remove? Is it all way the back up to the shaft or do they they leave some slack?

Surely the foreskin is there to protect the sensitive hemlet underneath. I expect most men (apart from those that have been circumcised at a young age) have experienced the feeling when the helmet is uncovered when walking or exercising and it's rubbing against underwear.

I thought that the evolutionary process had left it there for a reason. Our bodies don't have many things which don't serve a purpose especially where the reproductive organs are concerned.
 
I'd like to suggest to all uncircumcised adult males in this thread to strongly consider circumcision. I know, I know, you don't want anyone messing with your junk and pain in that region is a scary thought. Take it from someone who has had a piece of a testicle removed (don't worry, I have huge testicles so there's more than enough left) you can handle a snip on the skin.

Why? There's absolutely nothing wrong with my uncircumcised todger.

Here's what you'll get when you circumcise:

- Potentially the ability to last longer in bed
You can increase stamina by practising. Which is fun.
- A more attractive penis (not that it's all that attractive a thing regardless)
Completely subjective, and not necessarily a problem if your foreskin draws back by itself when erect.
- An easier penis to keep extremely clean throughout the day, which will translate to...
- An increased chance of your partner being willing to perform any acts that require a super-clean penis.
Or you take 10-20 seconds of your day and clean it. It's so quick shouldn't ruin the mood one bit. Seems like a complete non-issue to me. But we're all different.

That's not to say that being uncircumcised is a problem. I'm sure you can handle all of the above just fine without circumcision, but let me say from the perspective of someone who is circumcised - I highly recommend it to every male.

Why recommend it to people who have absolutely no problem with being uncircumcised? Only problems or personal preference warrants surgery, no?
 
I think that's definitely an opinion matter. I don't personally see how a circumsized penis would look so much better.

Yes, it is personal preference.

Not really sure if this matters a whole lot. SoAp and water if it isn't clean enough.

...every time you hit the john?

I use the stall rather than the urinal (in many, not all cases) so that I can use toilet paper even when just taking a piss. Why would I do that you might ask - the answer is because cleanliness downstairs makes it easier for your partner. This is especially important when you're married.

Now, I know you can do that with an uncircumcised penis, it's just more effort.

Why? There's absolutely nothing wrong with my uncircumcised todger.

Because in my experience, circumcision is a good thing. Everything I hear about being uncircumcised leads me to believe that it is worse. I'm just offering my experience, obviously you can take it or leave it. I'm not saying there's anything wrong.


Why recommend it to people who have absolutely no problem with being uncircumcised? Only problems or personal preference warrants surgery, no?

I'm saying there are good reasons for your personal preference to lead you to go for it.
 
Last edited:
Because in my experience, circumcision is a good thing. Everything I hear about being uncircumcised leads me to believe that it is worse. I'm just offering my experience, obviously you can take it or leave it. I'm not saying there's anything wrong.

It's a question of perspective I suppose. It's the same for me (but the other way around). Circumcision would make my sex life a lot less good that's for sure.


I'm saying there are good reasons for your personal preference to lead you to go for it.

Ok. No disagreement there.
 
Those without the skin in this thread are clearly lazy men. All that talk about easier to clean. Silly skinless men. :lol:
 
**Possibility of a TMI post here, I apologise in advance**

I'm in a unique position here in that I haven't been circumcised but I do not have a foreskin at all, or even any hint of one. When I was born I had a problem similar to being born with both sets of genitals (I wasn't, before you get too freaked out) and that meant that I needed lots of operations when I was younger to...fix it. It hasn't affected my sex life and I operate perfectly normally. Infact it often seems to help the girl along a little and while I'm waving my e-penis (almost literally) the doctors said I "should be god damn proud of that one". Anyways that's just some background before I answer some posts.

I have to ask the question, how much skin do they actually remove? Is it all way the back up to the shaft or do they they leave some slack?

Surely the foreskin is there to protect the sensitive hemlet underneath. I expect most men (apart from those that have been circumcised at a young age) have experienced the feeling when the helmet is uncovered when walking or exercising and it's rubbing against underwear.

I thought that the evolutionary process had left it there for a reason. Our bodies don't have many things which don't serve a purpose especially where the reproductive organs are concerned.

I have no problems at all, the only time it becomes sensitive is after sex. That said, I do seem to have reduced sensation there.

Those without the skin in this thread are clearly lazy men. All that talk about easier to clean. Silly skinless men. :lol:

I've been complimented on how clean and 'tidy' mine is by every single girl I've slept with :lol:
 
**Possibility of a TMI post here, I apologise in advance**

I'm in a unique position here in that I haven't been circumcised but I do not have a foreskin at all, or even any hint of one. When I was born I had a problem similar to being born with both sets of genitals (I wasn't, before you get too freaked out) and that meant that I needed lots of operations when I was younger to...fix it. It hasn't affected my sex life and I operate perfectly normally. Infact it often seems to help the girl along a little! Anyways that's just some background before I answer some posts.

If it wasn't that then I'm very curious as to what it was...
 
I actually can't remember. It's been nearly 10 years since I had to visit hospital for a check up and I've forgotten since then what I actually had. It's been well documented so I'm sure the hospital has the records somewhere but the doctor I grew to knew for 18 years of my life was recently up on pedophilia charges so I don't fancy tracking him down really.

For what it's worth I believe he was innocent and was an easy target because of his job but there we go.
 
I know you can do that with an uncircumcised penis, it's just more effort.

Well "Just more effort" doesn't really mean too much effort. Far from it in fact. But yes, I imagine it's a little less time-consuming if you were circumcised. Not that it matters a great deal.
 
- Potentially the ability to last longer in bed
[citation needed]
- A more attractive penis (not that it's all that attractive a thing regardless)
Completely subjective. Personally, I wouldn't want my johnson to look scarry, two-toned, and dried out. Any woman who strongly disagrees with me to the point where she refuses to do anything (to any uncut man) is not a woman worth anything.
- An easier penis to keep extremely clean throughout the day, which will translate to...
- An increased chance of your partner being willing to perform any acts that require a super-clean penis.
I shower every day. I wash Mr. Johnson every day. Takes no effort at all. Maintenance isn't any more difficult

That's not to say that being uncircumcised is a problem. I'm sure you can handle all of the above just fine without circumcision, but let me say from the perspective of someone who is circumcised - I highly recommend it to every male.

And I highly recommend to every male that they don't get it done.

(Note that I did not recommend that you circumcise your children)
I'm glad we agree. To clarify I meant that it should be banned for infants and children. Once you turn 18 you can do whatever you want. No different from getting those giant, hideous holes in your ear lobes.
 
Circumcised men can't do a Kenny impersonation with their penis.

Check and mate.
 
MÜLE_9242;8001044
[citation needed]

Completely subjective. Personally, I wouldn't want my johnson to look scarry, two-toned, and dried out.

Mine doesn't really look scarry, nor is dried out. The two-toned is only for a line... its pretty cool actually.

MÜLE_9242;8001044
[citation needed]
I shower every day. I wash Mr. Johnson every day. Takes no effort at all. Maintenance isn't any more difficult

How would you know? I understand its not that hard, but its like making your bed everyday. You can either make your entire bed, or just say screw it and throw the top decorative duvet with the 6 decorative pillows in the closet and only keep what you sleep under made and nice.
 
I have to ask the question, how much skin do they actually remove? Is it all way the back up to the shaft or do they they leave some slack?

Surely the foreskin is there to protect the sensitive hemlet underneath. I expect most men (apart from those that have been circumcised at a young age) have experienced the feeling when the helmet is uncovered when walking or exercising and it's rubbing against underwear.

I thought that the evolutionary process had left it there for a reason. Our bodies don't have many things which don't serve a purpose especially where the reproductive organs are concerned.
That depends on the doctor. Some doctors take off soe much it's painful to get an erection, others like me hardly get any removed.
Circumcised men can't do a Kenny impersonation with their penis.

Check and mate.


Oh I see how it is haha.
 
Back