Sex is plenty pleasureable for me, in fact I have no problem at all. I'm just saying it could have been even more pleasureable had I been left intact.
"Intact" makes it sound like your penis was removed.
Can you climax easily? Can you last long enough for your wife/gf to climax? Then you're getting everything out of sex (without adding anal, which you should do if you're worried about getting everything you can out of sex).
But I will never know because I was cut.
"Cut", makes it sound like your penis was removed. If you can climax and you can get her to climax easily, you're doing it right.
Also, I'm totally not into anal haha. And yes ther are times when my penis can be overly stimulated and its painful. But that is besides the point.
No it is exactly the point - because your so-called insensitive circumcised penis is capable of
plenty of stimulation. More than you can handle. Also if you're not willing to try anal (I'm not, so I can't blame you), you're not really all that concerned with getting every last bit of enjoyment out of sex are you?
I actually find the pleasure from the shaft and more complete throughout more compared to the more confined feeling on the head and to be more enjoyable as what I get from the head is so strong that I literally keel over and cannot even touch it, especially after an orgasm. I guess wanting to restore it is more so to be like I should be rather than something I'm not. Putting it back the way it was and should have been.
Why? I think it's better circumcised.
I wasn't aware that tonsils were regularly removed if there were no complications with them. And my other comment added plenty to the discussion - perspective.
They are commonly removed preventatively out of concern for future complications.
Also, comparing male circumcision to the barbaric female circumcision is not perspective - it's pointless. The only similarity they share is the name and that it's between the legs. Otherwise it's night and day. There is a part of the penis that would be analogous to female circumcision, but it doesn't get removed in any culture (that I know of) so it's removal doesn't have a name (that I know of).
MÜLE_9242;7995215
Should be banned in all cases until age 18. No exceptions for any backwards religions, either.
Absolutely disgusting that parents would force this on their kids. The Penn and Teller: BS episode on this is quite informative.
I'd like to suggest to all uncircumcised adult males in this thread to strongly consider circumcision. I know, I know, you don't want anyone messing with your junk and pain in that region is a scary thought. Take it from someone who has had a piece of a testicle removed (don't worry, I have huge testicles so there's more than enough left) you can handle a snip on the skin.
Here's what you'll get when you circumcise:
- Potentially the ability to last longer in bed
- A more attractive penis (not that it's all that attractive a thing regardless)
- An easier penis to keep
extremely clean throughout the day, which will translate to...
- An increased chance of your partner being willing to perform any acts that require a super-clean penis.
That's not to say that being uncircumcised is a problem. I'm sure you can handle all of the above just fine without circumcision, but let me say from the perspective of someone who is circumcised - I
highly recommend it to every male.
(Note that I did not recommend that you circumcise your children)