- 29,124
- Glasgow
- GTP_Mars
I have a horrible feeling that the Chinese government, now knowing the true extent of the danger, are basically now acting to protect the rest of the country and are going to leave the people of Wuhan to their fate. There are multiple reasons to believe that the Chinese authorities would prefer to trap people in their own homes rather than risk further spreading of the virus. Tragically, it could well transpire that this strategy virtually guarantees more hardship (and likely more deaths) in Wuhan, for the benefit of the rest of the country.
I think you are being incredibly generous to the Epidemiologist-in-Chief @PeterJB
-
A point of correction: the official name of the virus is SARS-CoV-2, and not COVID-19 as I posted somewhere earlier. COVID-19 is actually the name of the illness that the SARS-CoV-2 virus causes.
-
I have a horrible feeling that the Chinese government, now knowing the true extent of the danger, are basically now acting to protect the rest of the country and are going to leave the people of Wuhan to their fate. There are multiple reasons to believe that the Chinese authorities would prefer to trap people in their own homes rather than risk further spreading of the virus. Tragically, it could well transpire that this strategy virtually guarantees more hardship (and likely more deaths) in Wuhan, for the benefit of the rest of the country.
Yeah, that would be human rights violation to not help them. Surely China wouldn't allow that...They mustn't be allowed to starve
Your challenge, should you choose to accept it, is to find any other site reporting on F1 postponing the Chinese Grand Prix that actually covered that.A point of correction: the official name of the virus is SARS-CoV-2, and not COVID-19 as I posted somewhere earlier. COVID-19 is actually the name of the illness that the SARS-CoV-2 virus causes.
We be nerds.It’s a situation caused by a new strain of virus in the coronavirus family. Coronaviruses have previously been responsible for SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) and MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome) epidemics in 2002 and 2012 respectively. The new strain, called novel coronavirus (nCoV), has caused at least 45,000 cases of a respiratory disorder called COVID-19 since first identified in Wuhan, China, in December 2019.
Perhaps the windmills will blow it away.
Chinese President Xi Jinping has called for tightened control over online discussion and increased policing to ensure "positive energy" and social stability, state media said Saturday, as the country struggles to contain the deadly new coronavirus.
Xi's remarks were made public as the authorities have faced rare bouts of public anger over the handling of an epidemic that has killed more than 1,500 people and infected some 66,000 across the country.
Censors had allowed some online criticism of local officials in central Hubei -- the epicentre and origin of the crisis -- but calls for freedom of speech and political reform were scrubbed after the death of a whistleblowing doctor from the virus.
The government must "strengthen the management and control of online media," and "crack down on those who seize the opportunity to create rumours" on the internet, Xi said in the February 3 speech published by state media.
Simultaneously, "it is necessary to increase use of police force and strengthen the visible use of police," Xi said, calling for a crackdown on behaviour that "disrupts social order" including hoarding medical supplies.
Xi urged party members to "dare to criticise" those who had failed to carry out the Communist Party central committee's instructions, and warned "those who fail to perform their duties shall be punished according to discipline and law."
Local officials in Hubei have already begun to feel the force of Xi's orders.
On Thursday, the political chiefs of Hubei and its capital, Wuhan, were sacked and replaced by Xi loyalists with security backgrounds.
The province's top two health officials have also been fired.
Xi also called for the government to emphasize effective actions it has taken and "vividly describe touching deeds" from the frontlines of the fight against the virus.
"Let positive energy fill the cyberspace from start to end," Xi said in the speech, given earlier this month at a meeting of the Politburo Standing Committee, China's ruling council.
Xi initially kept a low profile in the early weeks of the crisis but has stepped up his public rhetoric in recent days on what he has called a "people's war" against the virus.
Some years ago my petite but voluptuous Jewish girlfriend and I were taking a 2 week tour by sports car of the desert Southwest.
The object was to visit as many archeological sites, petroglyphs, native American tribal and interpretive centers and museums a possible.
Along the way we picked up souvenirs and such, including the Tee-shirt seen below - albeit in green. It's made my day many times since then.
https://news.yahoo.com/chinas-xi-urges-more-policing-virus-toll-rises-115750208.html
An elderly British couple onboard the Diamond Princess in Yokohama have (allegedly) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2...
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...-coronavirus-hit-cruise-ship-diamond-princess
The whole Diamond Princess situation is becoming something of a farce - 15% of its original complement of 3,700 have now tested positive (542 people), which means that this is the single biggest cluster of cases (and by far the highest concentration of (known) cases) of the virus in the world... and yet, the UK still have no plans to evacuate its citizens from the ship.
If this elderly couple (or other UK citizens still trapped onboard) end up dying , the 🤬 is going to hit the fan. They have repeatedly asked for help and have asked the UK government what it is doing - only yesterday did the first indications come from the government that they are doing something... and yet, several other countries (e.g. the US) have successfully evacuated their citizens (including those testing positive) from the ship.
The danger now is that a) it might already be too late for some people or b) they now face an uncertain future, under the control of Japanese authorities. While I would much rather be trapped in Japan than China, it is still a far cry from being treated at home.
The extent of the outbreak on this ship has proven at least one thing - cruise ships are not hospitals and the quarantine measures onboard are clearly not sufficient to halt the spread of the virus - so why, as the number of infections continues to rise, is there not more urgency to get these people off and/or on an emergency flight home?
I have laid an instrument before the House to confirm the power we have taken to isolate those at risk of spreading the virus, and if necessary to keep them isolated, as part of our belt and braces approach to protecting the public.
Quarantining the ship in port was the easiest option. With hindsight, it was not a very good one.Between pirates, capsizing, breakdowns, horrible scheduling, and virus outbreaks I don't think I ever need to step foot on a cruise ship.
And it does seem weird that more isn't being done for the people stuck on these cruise ships. I know a couple from Utah is currently aboard one of the ships in quarantine and it sounds awful. Seems like they could sail the ship out to sea a bit and then evac people via helicopter to a hospital equipped to treat the illness.
There was no professional infection control specialist aboard the ship. 542 passengers confirmed positive for the coronavirus.
Yes, and I can only think that somewhere a backroom boffin is excitedly going over the statistics generated in this sadistic Petri dish experiment.I'm almost speechless watching this video.
And quite angry. What chance to people have when there is no proper infection control system in place?
This is really shocking but it explains why the number of infections keeps rising - a chain is only as strong as the weakest link...
I wish my firm had similar guidance... I could do with a couple of weeks off. No symptoms so far but I return to the UK a week Sunday and am due to start work the following day with no option of home working. Perhaps a quick phone call/email to the boss is in order on Monday morning before I infect the whole building as there doesn't seem to be any compulsory testing or quarantining of returnees as far as I can tell and it's left to us to self diagnose.Oh... and the girl with flu-like symptoms that came back from the far East last week was back in the office today, coughing, sneezing and leaving snot rags on her desk. I went home to work. I am on the verge of reporting her - we have had emails asking people who have recently visited the far East to report any symptoms and to not come into work... and yet I am reluctant to report her behaviour lest I stand accused of racism and/or paranoia.
Quite. And an article that makes statements as if they are established facts when they are not doesn't help either.Not as yet peer reviewed science may be no better than speculation
Not as yet peer reviewed science may be no better than speculation
Quite.
Yes, though the fact that the paper may well end up in a peer-reviewed journal doesn't mean that the claims made in the article that cites the paper as evidence are true.After browsing the pre-review article though, it's some pretty impressive speculation that looks like it might pass peer review. Wouldn't be the first time illness attacks different physiology differently.
Why? You would be as well to pull a statement out of thin air and assume that is true... it's not the basis for a worthwhile discussion in this thread at this time.DotiniFor a moment assume it's true.
Easy. For me, it takes the urgency and worry out of the equation. I can move along to more interesting and important things.Why?