- 3,786
- Brisbane, Australia
- Chameleon9000
Did you just tell us the exact reason that we can say that god isn't real? Or did i misread you?In order to determine if something is true, it must be testable.
Did you just tell us the exact reason that we can say that god isn't real? Or did i misread you?In order to determine if something is true, it must be testable.
Please explain.Yes, and look at the chain reaction because of his evolution theory.
Evidence of what?I've said many times before. Look around. That is your evidence.
No one has said it did, stop claiming they have.It hasn't come from nothing,
No its not, if yiou continue to misquote people and put words in their mouths you will receive a formal warning, the AUP is quite clear that making knowingly misleading statements is unacceptable.which is your logic and reasoning.
Once again the only person saying this is you. Do not continue to do to claim that others are when they are not.Until you further prove how it all started, you know that nothing can't make everything.
No that's what he is trying to quote, he just can't / won't format his posts in a coherent or consistent manner.Did you just tell us the exact reason that we can say that god isn't real? Or did i misread you?
If you had bothered to click on the link you'd see this time lapse:"Exorcet, post: 10632279, member: 117913"]
Haha, you could have fooled me. So where is this footage again? Or perhaps this telescope failed to miss the dust clouds or what ever else invisible to it's lens, to make it seem as if it exploded, right? Can you agree that this is a possibility?
The age of the universe and the age of the youngest star are unrelated. New stars begin fusion every day."Exorcet, post: 10632279, member: 117913"]Also, if the universe is 13-20billion years old, how old is the youngest star?
As I've said many times, maybe's and could be, and possibly doesn't move me.
Huh?"Exorcet, post: 10632279, member: 117913"]Yes, and look at the chain reaction because of his evolution theory.
Ok so first of I believe that yes God is real, but I agree with the theory of evolution and that God caused evolution to take place. Anyway what do you mean how do they know if it's 4.5 billion??All good and well, but just exactly how do they know it's 4.5 billion years old?
What!? That makes no logical sense, isn't relevant and provides more evidence for us to believe that you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about!Let me know when you die though
This being the problem:If you had bothered to click on the link
He doesn't want to click on anything that would mean he'd read or see anything that would challenge his beliefs - the very next sentence in the link he was responding to explains what he was asking, but he stopped there because he doesn't believe it."evidence" that has convinced scientists that the Earth is 4.5 to 4.6 billion
Did you honestly think I'd buy that after being there before?
And there we have the proof. Evolution trumps over faith yet again.I'm banning him from replying to this thread any more
Unfortunately, whether right or wrong, displays of wilful ignorance such as we've seen from the member in question is a net loss for all of us.And there we have the proof. Evolution trumps over faith yet again.
All I can think about when I watch this is: Boom.If you had bothered to click on the link you'd see this time lapse:
For some reason that brings to mind the critic of Galileo who refused to look through Galileo's telescope at the moons of Jupiter because he already knew they couldn't possibly be there.If you had bothered to click on the link you'd see this time lapse:
Well that would be obvious if you choose not to even start believing there is a God.
If the bible gave an accurate prediction that Africa would be swallowed by the sea, trust me, every man would have fear and start worshiping the God of the Bible. That would be forcing people to worship God, because of their fear. This is not the God of the Bible. You have a free choice to accept His free gift of salvation.
May I present to you an interesting alternative (non-Tower of Babel) explanation of the divergence of language and an explanation of why animals used to be so easy to hunt, and how that changed:-
“In the beginning, all people lived around a great ironwood tree in the jungle, speaking the same language. One man whose testes were enormously swollen from infection with a parasitic worm spent his time sitting on a branch of the tree, so that he could rest his heavy testes on the ground. Out of curiosity, animals of the jungle came up and sniffed at his testes. Hunters then found the animals easy to kill, and everyone had plenty of food and was happy.
“Then, one day, a bad man killed a beautiful woman’s husband, in order to get the woman for himself. Relatives of the dead husband attacked the murderer, who was defended in turn by his own relatives, until the murderer and his relatives climbed into the ironwood tree to save themselves. The attackers tugged on lianas hanging from one side of the tree, in order to pull the tree’s crown down towards the ground and get at their enemies.
“Finally, the lianas snapped in half, causing the tree to spring back with tremendous force. The murderer and his relatives were hurled out of the tree in many different directions. They landed so far away, in so many different places, that they never found each other again. With time, their languages became more and more divergent. That is why people today speak so many different languages and cannot understand each other, and why it is hard work for hunters to catch animals for food.”
Source - http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2002/nov/07/religious-success-story/
Surely this makes just as much sense as the bible?
A sledge is only ten or twenty pounds because we put big long handles on them to get leverage. It's a lot easier to use a lighter tool on a long handle to get the same amount of force, but if a long handle isn't an option then you just make the tool heavier.
33 pounds isn't really that much (~15kg?), it's very liftable with one hand if you're in decent shape, which you probably would be if you're killing stuff with your bare hands for elevensies.
giant (85cm-95cm) human or humanoid skeletons
Yes, I corrected my post. So far, they appear to be mainly 7 feet tall, with a few up to 8. Some had up to 40 teeth, with an extra row of molars.... A typo?
Another theory that is interesting and hard to dismiss is the Matrix theory that we are all brains-in-a-vat and that reality is a hoax, an artificial simulation. Inorganic machine-beings may be in complete control.
Does a metaphysical solipsist take a position on creation versus evolution?But I'm more a fan of metaphysical solipsism though.
Well, since metaphysical solipsists believe the only thing that really exists is their own conciseness one could say a solipsist is some kind or form of god or the god, a god who is not almighty or a reincarnation of god.Does a metaphysical solipsist take a position on creation versus evolution?
I just said hello to Francisco J. Ayala According to Wikipedia, he has donated some $10 million of his own money to the School of Biological Sciences here at UC Irvine.Had time to go through a couple of those journals, TM, the Ayala article Darwin's greatest Discovery: Design without designer was fantastic. The one on dinosaur evolution was good too, but a little heavy on the technical jumbo!
The big bang gave you air water and the sun. evolution gave you food."evidence" that has convinced scientists that the Earth is 4.5 to 4.6 billion
Did you honestly think I'd buy that after being there before?
Who are scientists to me. Did they give me fresh air, water, the warmth of the sun, food and rain?
Without these, it is impossible for man to live, agreed?
Do you assume I've got time to annoy?
How many times has it been said god would rise up and walk the earth again? HEAPS. Has it ever happened. NO.