Creation vs. Evolution

  • Thread starter ledhed
  • 9,687 comments
  • 446,916 views
He is the true embodiment of Poes Law:
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/PoesLaw

Maybe hes playing with us.
The 1st time I came across @DCP just happened to be April 1st & I said this, genuinely believing that I was reading a parody.

I am now convinced that you are serious & firm in your beliefs so you either deserve an apology or a huge "hats off" for hoodwinking a whole forum.

In terms of creation vs evolution, I think I know the answer & so does the conversation above.
 
Creationism being taught in public schools is disgusting.
It depends on the context. If it was taught as the only explanation for the origins of humankind, then it's a problem. But I teach in a public school, and while my subject areas don't go anywhere near creationism or evolution, I do know that both are taught in my school in parallel, that neither is taught as having any absolute merit over the other, and that the creationism content is opt-in. It's a question of balance, recognising both the scientific and metaphysical explanations for the origin of life, and we have never had a single complaint.
 
Creationism being taught as scientific fact in any school is disgusting.

FTFY. I have no problem with schools teaching Creationism, as long as it is taught along the lines of something like, "There are many people who believe......." and furthermore, that it is NOT taught or even discussed in a science class. There is absolutely no reason to explain to kids what a belief system is, and explain that many people feel the need to have a belief system that they can "rely" on. Where that falls would be something like social studies, or even English, where it can be discussed with literature.

The worst thing to do to kids is to hide from them something that other people think about. I mean, look at how that's worked out for DCP..... A mind can't be open and questioning if it is not exposed to questions, can it?

EDIT. Tree'd, sort of. :)
 
At my school there are creationsim classes once a term for anyone interested in learning about creationism.

My School is pretty agnostic though. Science doesn't really touch on Evolution itself unless it has too.
 
="Exorcet, post: 10625829, member: 117913"]No, those are dates when something is expected to actually happen based on evidence. Just as we can watch an object fall and predict when it will hit the ground, despite that event being in the future, we can do the same with stars and their deaths.

Wow, really looking forward to that...:) Is there one about to go off soon, because they've been around for billions of years, and surely we can expect one, since your guys say they only last for millions of years?

Also note another important difference between the scientific and religious events. The scientific ones are neutral, have no agenda. Far too far away to try to control or influence people and they also don't claim to be pre-planned events that you must prepare for. They're simply natural occurrences that are apparently inevitable.

A very cool word.
Do you agree that if the bible made convincing accurate to the second prophecies, everyone would then force themselves to follow God? Perhaps then, you would understand why prophecies are vague for men following men.



Yes, he is deeply indoctrinated and seems to lack the ability to even look for the truth, I suppose the old saying of leading a horse to water applies here. I still there is value in providing refuting arguments though, even if they won't benefit the person posting falsehoods [immediately]. You're suggestion to focus on how science works and prevent DCP from evading that sounds like a good suggestion.

Hmm, here I am, using free will believing those around me who dismiss God, are heavily indoctrinated.

See the irony here.:
"Thou shall not worship idols"
Darwin: we evolved from apes. We don't know where life originated from, and neither the big bang, but we are going to die trying to find out. Also, there is no afterlife. "I've been there, so you have my word"

Darwin, we agree with you, because there are some fossil evidence. When I die, I'm happy to become a chemical again.
Yep, talk about indoctrination.


It's hard to not see this as intentional. You are the only one claiming to know it all and refusing to learn. You don't understand science and you're not bothering to even try and correct that.

I understand it just fine. Since is doesn't fit your world view of it, it shouldn't make it wrong.
It is present and future observations and testing. Not a guessing game. Until they can prove no God, or show me visibly how suns are born, then I will stand by you forever, off course if you allow me to...:)


No one rational will be interested in souls and salvation unless they have a reason to care. You can't use scare tactics to get them to care, because without proof, you can't instill fear. Make no mistake, that even if you personally aren't trying to scare people, that is the foundation your religion is built upon.

Nope, no scare at all. Just a very silly gamble. Think of a criminal sitting in jail for a crime, when he has that moment "how the heck could I have been so dumb?". I allowed the devil to trick me into this, and yet I don't even believe he exists, because man couldn't prove it.

Trying to present information without proof doesn't work because it cannot be verified. You claim that our souls are at risk, yet can't establish that souls even exist. On the other hand everyone can readily verify that they are alive and need to do various things to stay that way. You would have us forgo very important things related to life just to chase after something that probably does not exist. It won't work.

God says you were fearfully and wonderfully made. Saying that all the extremely complicating aspects it took to make you came from a random process is absurd. You have a conscious, to tell you that stealing is wrong, or killing or lying to someone you care about is a no no. That is your soul. That's what separates you from the animals you claim to come from.

Evolution is one of those thing relevant to everyday life by the way. It has real impacts on people. If you decide to have a child, it is your genes (and the genes of your partner) that will dictate who your child is and what they have to live with. Are you both carriers of a crippling disease? Then there is a high chance of passing that disease to your children and making their entire lives and existence miserable. Religion in many cases goes and praises reproduction while being ignorant of the consequences. That is extremely unfortunate for the people that it might affect.

I think you need to brush up on miracles. It's real and it's happening right now. Your world is too small to know that.
 
DCP
I think you need to brush up on miracles. It's real and it's happening right now. Your world is too small to know that.
You're using that "too small" line...

You can say that with everything....

Your world is too small to know that Pokemon exist...
Your world is too small to know that there are multiple dimensions out to kill us all and eat us alive.
Your world is too small to know that God doesn't exist.
 
Could there be creation and evolution?
There are a few theories that are a sort-of mix of creation and evolution. Theistic evolution is the belief that God got the proverbial ball rolling - it's the official stance of the Catholic Church and I assume that most 'progressive' Christians also believe the same thing.

Another theory is day-age creationism, where God directly created the universe but over billions of years rather than 7 days. Each 'day' represented an extended amount of time rather than an actual day.

@Pseudopod because it's possible to believe in God and still have an education. :P
 
People having both an education and a religion doesn't answer that question, though.

Why would there be both? Did god create the initial spark that set off the big bang, and then let it do its own thing from that point? Are you essentially talking about deism? I don't think there are any deist religions.

If you're suggesting "god" guided evolution towards the current state, then that's not really evolution at all. It's so-called intelligent design, and that's something completely different than creation+evolution.
 
People having both an education and a religion doesn't answer that question, though.

Why would there be both? Did god create the initial spark that set off the big bang, and then let it do its own thing from that point? Are you essentially talking about deism? I don't think there are any deist religions.
Theistic evolution is a range of ideas in itself with some bordering on deism, but there is a belief that God created who we are today through evolution and still allows for divine intervention. There doesn't have to be conflict between science and religion.
 
In the former, God lets natural selection do it's thing without interfering, in the latter, He personally designs and creates every living thing Himself.
 
Being omniscient, God already knew how evolution would turn out, depending on the initial state of the creation. In that sense, god already decided exactly how things would evolve. That makes it a design, by an intelligent creator, not evolution.
 
In the former, God lets natural selection do it's thing without interfering, in the latter, He personally designs and creates every living thing Himself.

Oops, you gave the game away a tad there.

Strictly speaking, "Intelligent Design" does not mention God anywhere - that's because proponents of ID want it to be taught in state schools in the US, but biblical creationism - being a religious doctrine - cannot be taught for legal reasons, hence why creationists have conjured up something that is exactly like creationism but specifically omits any and all references to who the designer is or might be.

And if that sounds ridiculous to you, then you are certainly not alone.
 
It just doesn't work.
There is no gap theory. God says sin entered the world because of one man.
If Adam existed only 6000 years ago according to the Bible, which I believe and trust in, then anything before Adam shouldn't have had been cursed. Has evolution found any perfect bone specimens, with no diseases etc?
If not, then they have this problem.
Woe to them though, that give people a reason to believe God doesn't exist.
Either way, those people are without excuse.
 
DCP
It just doesn't work.
There is no gap theory. God says sin entered the world because of one man.
If Adam existed only 6000 years ago according to the Bible, which I believe and trust in, then anything before Adam shouldn't have had been cursed. Has evolution found any perfect bone specimens, with no diseases etc?
If not, then they have this problem.
Woe to them though, that give people a reason to believe God doesn't exist.
Either way, those people are without excuse.
"believe" doesn't cut it without actual evidence of an Adam existing 6000 years ago?
 
"believe" doesn't cut it without actual evidence of an Adam existing 6000 years ago?

Tell me about it.

What?It doesn't say this in the Bible. Also, what?What?!

"Evolution" is a natural mechanism. How would it find things?

Theist evolution believers (Dr. Hugh Ross), say that God created the big bang, and that somewhere between that, and day 1 mentioned in the bible, they fit evolution and the billions of years.

Haven't we already established it DOESN'T say this anywhere in the bible.?

If you don't believe in God, you don't believe in the Bible automatically. There is a reason why the bible gives genealogies. You could then work backwards to Adam. This might help http://creation.com/6000-years

Fittingly Jesus said Himself, for at the "beginning of creation", God made them male and female.
 
Except it doesn't help. Because the Earth is not 6000 years old. It is 4.5 billion years old. It doesn't matter what any ancient book says (or doesn't say).
 
DCP
Theist evolution believers (Dr. Hugh Ross), say that God created the big bang, and that somewhere between that, and day 1 mentioned in the bible, they fit evolution and the billions of years.
That literally has nothing to do with what I said or the questions I asked you.

Also the Big Bang has nothing to do with evolution.
DCP
If you don't believe in God, you don't believe in the Bible automatically. There is a reason why the bible gives genealogies. You could then work backwards to Adam. This might help http://creation.com/6000-years
The Bible makes no mention of 6,000 years from Creation to the present day (if I remember my Ussher correctly, it'd be 6019 years now).
 
Likewise, it doesn't matter what man says to deceive me. I'll stand on the word of God forever.
No one can prove the world is 4.5 billion years old (waiting for the legendary time machine).
They can't even explain why dinosaurs, supposed to be 65million years old, still have soft tissue in their bones today.
Where is Darwin when you need him?
Off course the cleaner must find a way to cover it up and bring new speculation again.
 
Back