No it isn't. If the outcome is known then there is no "chance" or "choice", merely playing out of a scene.
We've covered this before. I drew a book analogy. The characters in the book would look, if they were real, as if they were choosing things for themselves. But the book has already been written. If I read ahead two chapters I could see what choices they made, then read back and watch them make them.
If they were human, they'd think they were exercising free will, but we, as the reader, know better. Their choices are predetermined and, no matter how many times we read it, they will never change.
Similarly, if we were part of an overall story, all of which is known by an omniscient God, then nothing we do can be characterised as free will. We are merely playing out a story. We'd think we were exercising our right to choose but in reality we had no choice at all, since it was all predestined to happen.
If we weren't part of a story and COULD make snap decisions which had not been foretold then we would directly deny the existence of an ominscient God. Our actions change the future to one which is not set and has not been foreseen on this basis. If it hasn't been foreseen, it is unknown and if it is unknown then omniscience is impossible - nothing can be unknown for omniscience to be true.
So again, if free will truely exists, then God cannot (or at least the traditional God as portrayed by Judeo/Christian/Islamic cultures, as opposed to the Hindu gods who "know, but he may not know") exist. On the other hand, if God exists then there is no free will - which means that God could foresee that Eve ate the fruit because a talking snake told her to, just as He foresaw Peter deny Him three times.
The opposite of predeterminism.
