- 3,823
- London, Ontario
- voodoovaj
Because Sony is technically supposed to enforce it, and why else would they do it? They're working on GT6, they don't need to worry about this. Even if Sony didn't directly call for this, PD really are supposed to take action when people break the TOS.
I'm not making assumptions. We all knew this would end up happening.
It's unlikely to have come from Sony head office. PD is Sony and vice versa if you want to talk corporate since PD is wholly owned by Sony. However, each studio will guide it's own product as it sees fit unless something happens to warrant intervention.
This is not one such case.
Sony is pretty open. Like any company, they care about the bottom line. There was very little (if anything) infringing on income. In fact, I saw several posts from people coming back to the title because of modding which is positive. If anything, a Sony exec is on the phone with PD asking why they stopped it and how they plan to handle the fallout.
Sony has funded Drive Club. I think that is all you need to know about how Sony as a company feels regarding the direction of Gran Turismo.
They CAN'T leave it in because Sony WONT let them because Sony CAN'T let them since they probably have a bunch of fine print agreements with all the companies that could potentially get them in trouble, EVEN IF IT'S JUST GAME DATA AND DOESN'T ACTUALLY DO ANYTHING VISUAL.
Remember that there is the burden of proof in a legal dispute. Without evidence that there is harm, there is no case. Showing a video of a modded car with a part swap that looks just like a tuned car without a parts swap is extremely flimsy.
Here is a more reasonable theory (I stress that). Given the ease of modding and the almost too good to be true way that modding works with the PP system, one could assume that modding was at some point discussed and implemented to some extent. Community modding would have infringed on that intellectual property. Just a theory.
Last edited: