Scaff
Moderator
- 29,760
- He/Him
- ScaffUK
You mean like your one, as the one I mentioned is the oldest in existenceLike I said, there are many bibles popping up, true, false and deceptive.
You mean like your one, as the one I mentioned is the oldest in existenceLike I said, there are many bibles popping up, true, false and deceptive.
No, I try and get away as soon as possible. Anyway, it seems to me that the whole point of going to church is to worship, at least when I've been there that's been the main focus. This completely contradicts what you said before. By your logic, I have no need to go to church at all. If I want to socialise with other "brethren" then I don't have to go to a church to do that, and according to you god can only be worshipped in spirit, so please tell me why there is a need to go to church.
Oh, but that's what makes it entertaining!Ok, let us not get spiteful now...
No, I didn't lose you...what I was saying was that if going to church is all about socialising and having fellowship with brethren (I hate that word) then why is it necessary to go through a whole service devoted to worshipping god when that can only be done in spirit, not in a physical church?You lost me when I said socialize and fellowship. Stay with me now...
You fellowship with people during service, and perhaps socialize after church, even if for a few minutes.
Jesus said, " When two or three and gathered, I am there in the midst"
I'm starting to wonder, have you ever seen anyone filled with the Spirit in your church?
Not for the person who is on the other end, even in 'spite' of his bests attempts to remain diplomatic.Oh, but that's what makes it entertaining!
Haha no, I was joking. I too would prefer if all debates remained diplomatic.Not for the person who is on the other end, even in 'spite' of his bests attempts to remain diplomatic.
Good.Haha no, I was joking. I too would prefer if all debates remained diplomatic.
The diplomatic person who said I was being controlled by the devil and would kill myself? That diplomatic person?Not for the person who is on the other end, even in 'spite' of his bests attempts to remain diplomatic.
If he genuinely believes that you have been controlled by the devil then he is still technically being diplomatic...The diplomatic person who said I was being controlled by the devil and would kill myself? That diplomatic person?
Oh, but that's what makes it entertaining!
No, I didn't lose you...what I was saying was that if going to church is all about socialising and having fellowship with brethren (I hate that word) then why is it necessary to go through a whole service devoted to worshipping god when that can only be done in spirit, not in a physical church?
So you find it acceptable and diplomatic to tell people that they will commit suicide?If he genuinely believes that you have been controlled by the devil then he is still technically being diplomatic...
So would you say that the physical building would be called a church? Because that's what I've been led to believe.Socializing "before", and "after" church.
Worshiping the Lord, "during" the service, while in "fellowship" with the "Spiritual" church. Not the physical building.
Lets try again. The "church", is the body of Christ.
To answer your question in the natural, you can worship on an empty field if you want.
Where do you think early Christians worshiped Christ before church buildings were built? Anywhere convenient.
The church building, is called the House of God. It can be distinguished by anyone who wants to enter it.
@Scaff
Led by him unknowingly, ultimately leading to spiritual death, yes. The spiritual death you say doesn't exist because you don't see evidence...![]()
no, but that is from a logical standpoint. But either way, i don't know why we are having this discussion considering what i originally said is "Ok, let us not get spiteful now...". I wasn't saying that to just you, i was saying it to everyone. I had not read the comment about you being controlled by the devil, but what i said still applies to it.So you find it acceptable and diplomatic to tell people that they will commit suicide?
And you are not a member of staff here, so please don't play the role.no, but that is from a logical standpoint. But either way, i don't know why we are having this discussion considering what i originally said is "Ok, let us not get spiteful now...". I wasn't saying that to just you, i was saying it to everyone. I had not read the comment about you being controlled by the devil, but what i said still applies to it.
Errr mate, i don't think you are reading me in the right way here...And you are not a member of staff here, so please don't play the role.
If you think a post breaks the AUP report it.
Your instructing members on how to behave, I'm reading it just fine.Errr mate, i don't think you are reading me in the right way here...
i don't think this is the correct place for this conversation...Your instructing members on how to behave, I'm reading it just fine.
Anyway, please be specific on Matthew 27 and adultery again?
Again, the law of the old covenant is for "THE JEWS" and not for the christians and salvation.
Matthew 5:17Do not think that I [Jesus] have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.
Be of good cheer though, because you keep asking, means you fighting it to learn something, else you wouldn't bother...![]()
And you know that your one isn't deceiving you because...?Holy Spirit is key man. It leads one into all truth. The Spirit is key and is vital.
You will be able to discern anything false, not of God. This is where non believers lose us completely unfortunately, instead of pursuing it.
Like I said, there are many bibles popping up, true, false and deceptive
So you are either unable or unwilling to answer the question.
And you know that your one isn't deceiving you because...?
have you ever seen anyone filled with the Spirit in your church?
Having received the Holy Spirit while accepting Jesus I've been where you are. None of it is true, and none of it works. You aren't really in a position to claim that you've been in my current shoes because you don't share any of my views so far as I can tell.Here, maybe this will help you guys understand. I know how difficult it is to, with natural eyes though. I've been there.
Then you will be handed over to be persecuted and put to death, and you will be hated by all nations because of me. At that time many will turn away from the faith and will betray and hate each other
How dreadful it will be in those days for pregnant women and nursing mothers.
Therefore keep watch, because you do not know on what day your Lord will come. 43 But understand this: If the owner of the house had known at what time of night the thief was coming, he would have kept watch and would not have let his house be broken into. 44 So you also must be ready, because the Son of Man will come at an hour when you do not expect him.
No, that's the problem. This is not clear at all. What is happening is this: A book is making a claim and not providing anything to support the claim. This makes the book irrelevant. To follow its advice is to put many in grave danger, so there isn't really an incentive to follow the book unless you just don't care very much about other people.It's clear God is warning all of us of bad things happening, and bad things to come.
If you want your questions answered, at least try reading with an open heart, instead of fulfilling prophecy all the time..Here http://www.gotquestions.org/bad-things-good-people.html
It's pretty clear and straight to the point.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_VujicicI mean, if a man could not give up on God in this condition, how much more for you who has everything?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Vujicic
And that someone sharper doesn't warn people either?So I ask you, if science is sharp, why can't they warn people in areas where is will happen?
I'll tell you, because there is someone sharper that you'll temporarily block out.
That's obvious. What we can do though, is try to determine what is inevitable. And at the moment, this is not:You see, man cannot stop the inevitable, no matter how much blood, sweat and tears come out of him.
the world has fallen, clear that people can escape it through Jesus, and it's also clear that no man is forced to do so.
So would you say that the physical building would be called a church? Because that's what I've been led to believe.
Apologies, 5:27, a man who looks at a woman with lechery has already committed adultery. In this way the Bible is interpreted to demonstrate that some of the OT commandments (particularly 7, I think) are unsustainable.
And Jesus is the Son and Embodiment of the God of that covenant, yet Christians accept that the OT God is flawed and was incorrect.
If the laws of the OT are for the Jews and for neither Christians nor salvation then why do we read in Matthew 5 that
That seems to me to be a fine example of cherry-picking.
Pure patrony aside...you should think that reply through. Why else might I bother?
And you know that your one isn't deceiving you because...?
Having received the Holy Spirit while accepting Jesus I've been where you are. None of it is true, and none of it works. You aren't really in a position to claim that you've been in my current shoes because you don't share any of my views so far as I can tell.
You will hear of wars and rumors of wars, but see to it that you are not alarmed. Such things must happen, but the end is still to come. 7 Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be famines and earthquakes in various places. 8 All these are the beginning of birth pains.
No, that's the problem. This is not clear at all. What is happening is this: A book is making a claim and not providing anything to support the claim. This makes the book irrelevant. To follow its advice is to put many in grave danger, so there isn't really an incentive to follow the book unless you just don't care very much about other people.
This supports what I say above. No proof for God, no logical reasoning applied to what he allegedly says. Instead, we're just to accept that we all deserve whatever happens to us and that God, despite being able to step in and stop out (all without violating our free will) is morally correct for standing around and doing nothing. The same act would spark outrage if done by a person while a young child near by dashed out into a highway.
"Job did not understand why God had allowed the things He did, but he knew God was good and therefore continued to trust in Him. Ultimately, that should be our reaction as well."
Following this logic, we should do nothing about earthquakes and flooding, even if we can. We shouldn't even resist the anti-christ. We're just supposed to sit back, ignore our (supposedly God given) intelligence, and suffer.
What is the point here? He may have suffered quite a bit but that doesn't make his religion true. He suffered and clinged to lies, some people will do that.
And that someone sharper doesn't warn people either?
Scientists don't claim to know anything. They will do what they can. It's pretty simple. You can't expect someone to do something impossible.
That's obvious. What we can do though, is try to determine what is inevitable. And at the moment, this is not:
Both because there is no proof and because it contradicts itself as God is forcing everyone to obey him with the threat of fire.
Or a powerful being that is deceiving you into thinking that it is god.After years of the flesh, my home and my heart is cleaned completely, from the desires of the world. Just for the asking, and for change, only God can rescue a person from such things.
Or a powerful being that is deceiving you into thinking that it is god.
How can you tell?
That'll be a fun sentence for you to read back to yourself.If it's good for the heart and soul, I rather stick to this deceiving God...![]()
How? Why do you think you have the wisdom, intellect and knowledge to tell when an evil superior being is misleading you into thinking you're worshipping a good superior being and when you're actually worshipping a good superior being - but no-one else does?If it's evil, wicked and hateful, oh I would be able to tell straight away.
That'll be a fun sentence for you to read back to yourself.How? Why do you think you have the wisdom, intellect and knowledge to tell when an evil superior being is misleading you into thinking you're worshipping a good superior being and when you're actually worshipping a good superior being - but no-one else does?
The only things that make you think you're on the right side is a book (that could be a deception), the people who interpret it for you (who could be evil spirits in disguise) and the trust that everything good coming your way is because of goodness and not a temptation into evil. After all, what better way to tempt someone than to give them what they desire - and what better way to keep them ignorant of the fact than to tell them they cannot question it if it is good?
The will of your chosen deity is, according to his own book, ineffable. You cannot know either his plan or intent - you just have to unquestioningly trust in it. It stands to reason that Satan - formerly one of his own angels - as a similarly powerful deity (albeit lesser, according to the book) would also have an ineffable will. Indeed Satan's own fall was something known to God and something he allowed to happen for reasons that you cannot ever know...Because it must have it's evil wicked intent, else what's the use.
According to the book that could be a deception and the priests who interpret it for you who could be evil spirits.A being already has that job
The will of your chosen deity is, according to his own book, ineffable. You cannot know either his plan or intent - you just have to unquestioningly trust in it. It stands to reason that Satan - formerly one of his own angels - as a similarly powerful deity (albeit lesser, according to the book) would also have an ineffable will. Indeed Satan's own fall was something known to God and something he allowed to happen for reasons that you cannot ever know...
So while everything that is going nicely for you appears to be just reward for being good, it could in fact be Satan making it appear that way and tempting you into unwittingly worshipping him for unknown reasons. God could be allowing it to happen for unknown reasons too. You could reach your afterlife and have God reveal to you that all your life you have been worshipping Satan and denied entry to your afterlife paradise.
Do you believe that when Satan tempts mortals he appears in front of them saying "I am Satan, here to tempt you" - or do you believe that Satan, "The Great Deceiver", employs deceit when tempting people? It's worth noting that a lot of Christians belief you must suffer in this life to be rewarded in the next. You're claiming that you're being rewarded in this one...
You are dealing with superior beings. You cannot comprehend their will, their motives or their reasons. There is no way for you to know that you are not worshipping an evil superior being by mistake.According to the book that could be a deception and the priests who interpret it for you who could be evil spirits.