- 106
- Spain
Well... I mean they always talk bad about DR simulation and DR 2.0 comparing it to RBR. And that is not being objective. Because? Because in RBR, a car cannot turn a real 90º angle as you can do in DR\DR 2.0 (and obviously in reality itself). There is only one type of canned driving... endless "U" turns... On the other hand, you can use all kinds of real techniques and they will come out almost identical to reality the DR\DR 2.0. That's a simulator. Obviously I am not going to commit the sacrilege that other users commit by saying that DR\DR 2.0 are like life itself... But of course they are politically correct if we talk about simulation. Reality will always be one step ahead. But CM does commendable work.Why not? In the end, isn't it just one subjective opinion against anothers? People prefer different things. Evidenced by the fact that nobody can agree on what's the best rally title. Just like nobody can agree on what's the best sim title.
Sure, there are some objective criteria but the rest is all subjective. Heck, even pro drivers that drive a real life racing car can't even agree on what's the most realistic simulator. That says it all really.
(I kinda agree with you that that video is clickbaity though, but then again what video isn't these days)
Last edited: