Elon's Antics

  • Thread starter Danoff
  • 1,215 comments
  • 78,988 views
TheCracker
If raising children was like prompt engineering, then you'd expect those children to grow up exactly how you want them to be. I'm not sure that allows for any free will leeway. Doesn't really sound like good parenting to me. But then, i don't think anyone has ever accused Musk of being a good parent.
Click to expand...
What would be the rearing childhood equivalent of "panel gaps"?
 
Screenshot-20240706-112824-Samsung-Internet.jpg


Those with South African and Canadian citizenship who purchase existing American automotive and social media companies are traitors.

All Caps: TRAITORS

What is the penalty for traitors again?

...

As an aside, whatever happened to that pest what would piss itself whenever anyone on this forum criticized that bitch?
 
TexRex
Screenshot-20240706-112824-Samsung-Internet.jpg


Those with South African and Canadian citizenship who purchase existing American automotive and social media companies are traitors.

All Caps: TRAITORS

What is the penalty for traitors again?

...

As an aside, whatever happened to that pest what would piss itself whenever anyone on this forum criticized that bitch?
Click to expand...
Musk's reply aside, this proposed legislation seems useless. Aren't only US citizens only allowed to vote in federal elections, anyway? Or was there some legal gray area I wasn't aware of?
 
Last edited:
MIE1992
Musk's reply aside, this proposed legislation seems useless. Aren't only US citizens only allowed to vote in federal elections, anyway? Or was there some legal gray area I wasn't aware of?
Click to expand...
No gray area. Federal law explicitly prohibits non-citizens voting in federal elections. The proposed legislation is populist pandering in furtherance to the big lie that the 2020 election was stolen or is otherwise illegitimate.
TexRex
cortes.jpg


Non-citizens, without regard for legality, are already prohibited from voting in elections for federal offices.

18 U.S.C. § 611, enacted by the passage of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 and its signing into law by President Bill Clinton, holds that "it shall be unlawful for any alien to vote in any election held solely or in part for the purpose of electing a candidate for the office of President, Vice President, Presidential elector, Member of the Senate, Member of the House of Representatives, Delegate from the District of Columbia, or Resident Commissioner, unless the election is held partly for some other purpose; aliens are authorized to vote for such other purpose under a State constitution or statute or a local ordinance; and voting for such other purpose is conducted independently of voting for a candidate for such Federal offices, in such a manner that an alien has the opportunity to vote for such other purpose, but not an opportunity to vote for a candidate for any one or more of such Federal offices."

Such legislative proposals--as that referred to in the screenshot and the one introduced by that rat Katie Britt (R-AL) what did the SOTU response--exist for no purpose other than pandering to the idiot base.
Click to expand...
It's absolutely wild to me that conservatives will cry that "liberals" think they're stupid and then they'll seek out representation that panders to them as though they are.
 
Last edited:
TexRex
No gray area. Federal law explicitly prohibits non-citizens voting in federal elections. The proposed legislation is populist pandering in furtherance to the big lie that the 2020 election was stolen or is otherwise illegitimate.
Click to expand...
What a revoltingly pointless use of tax dollars, then.
TexRex
It's absolutely wild to me that conservatives will cry that "liberals" think they're stupid and then they'll seek out representation that panders to them as though they are.
Click to expand...
Projection as usual, I suppose?
 
TexRex
As an aside, whatever happened to that pest what would piss itself whenever anyone on this forum criticized that bitch?
Click to expand...
Disappeared seemingly for good after @Tornado called him out on the other six times he threatened to leave but didn't because nobody actually cared, as well as calling him out on replying to people he had claimed to have blocked.

Show Ignored Content
 
Last edited:
Liquid
Disappeared seemingly for good after @Tornado called him out on the other six times he threatened to leave but didn't because nobody actually cared, as well as calling him out on replying to people he had claimed to have blocked.

Show Ignored Content
Click to expand...
He's still active on the GT Forums as CodeRedR51.
 
He REALLY doesn't understand that people aren't required to give him money, right?
 
Forcing someone to advertise on your platform. Hmm, I wonder what you would call such behaviour?
 
Please Apartheid Kylde, sue companies for not advertising on your platform so they can countersue your ass into the sun.

I'm not sure what criminal charges they could bring either. It's not illegal to not pay for services you're not using. If anything, Elmo is trying to extort money out of other companies.
 
Joey D
Please Apartheid Kylde, sue companies for not advertising on your platform so they can countersue your ass into the sun.

I'm not sure what criminal charges they could bring either. It's not illegal to not pay for services you're not using. If anything, Elmo is trying to extort money out of other companies.
Click to expand...
If somebody’s going to try to blackmail me with posting on Twitter? Blackmail me to tweet? Go **** yourself. Is that clear? - Advertisers, probably.
 
Last edited:
Ah, that's what he was deflecting from. Anyway:
A man who adores 1980s culture for no special reason
The European Commission offered X an illegal secret deal: if we quietly censored speech without telling anyone, they would not fine us.

The other platforms accepted that deal.

X did not.
Click to expand...
... but then did it anyway, just the way he wanted rather than the way anyone else did.
 
TexRex
No gray area. Federal law explicitly prohibits non-citizens voting in federal elections. The proposed legislation is populist pandering in furtherance to the big lie that the 2020 election was stolen or is otherwise illegitimate.

It's absolutely wild to me that conservatives will cry that "liberals" think they're stupid and then they'll seek out representation that panders to them as though they are.
Click to expand...
There are many crimes that are illegal. The difference between them and illegals voting, is that they are actually enforced. What good is it if it is illegal, but not enforced.

Every single person that goes to the polls should have to provide verifiable proof of citizenship. No mail-ins, paper ballots only, no drop off ballots, with every vote counted under full observation by both parties. Of course, allowances would be made for those who truly can't get to the polls.
 
dcmo3
There are many crimes that are illegal. The difference between them and illegals voting, is that they are actually enforced. What good is it if it is illegal, but not enforced.

Every single person that goes to the polls should have to provide verifiable proof of citizenship. No mail-ins, paper ballots only, no drop off ballots, with every vote counted under full observation by both parties. Of course, allowances would be made for those who truly can't get to the polls.
Click to expand...
There are ways to do universal mall in voting while keeping it secure. Utah figured it out and it works great.
 
dcmo3
There are many crimes that are illegal. The difference between them and illegals voting, is that they are actually enforced. What good is it if it is illegal, but not enforced.

Every single person that goes to the polls should have to provide verifiable proof of citizenship. No mail-ins, paper ballots only, no drop off ballots, with every vote counted under full observation by both parties. Of course, allowances would be made for those who truly can't get to the polls.
Click to expand...
lol. lmao, even.
 
dcmo3
81,000,000, right.
Click to expand...
81 million what right?

If it's votes cast in the 2020 US Presidential Election for Joe Biden, then that's not how US elections work. Here's a clue: 45 wasn't looking for another seven million, he was looking for another 11,780.

Big "even though we cheated we lost, so they must have cheated harder" energy here, which does pose the question of how so many Republicans were voted into office in this supposed Democrat-led voter fraud...
 
dcmo3
There are many crimes that are illegal. The difference between them and illegals voting, is that they are actually enforced. What good is it if it is illegal, but not enforced.

Every single person that goes to the polls should have to provide verifiable proof of citizenship. No mail-ins, paper ballots only, no drop off ballots, with every vote counted under full observation by both parties. Of course, allowances would be made for those who truly can't get to the polls.
Click to expand...
The fact that there are an extraordinarily small number of prosecutions of undocumented immigrants proves that a large number of undocumented immigrants are voting illegally. And we can ignore the fact that nowhere in the US was evidence uncovered actual widespread election fraud. Got it.
dcmo3
81,000,000, right. I'll have some of what you're smoking
Click to expand...
The fact that Biden won the election further proves that undocumented immigrants are voting. Right.
 
Last edited:
dcmo3
81,000,000, right. I'll have some of what you're smoking
Click to expand...
The fact that 81 million voted against trump really should not come as any surprise to you. The guy is absolutely horrible, all the time, on just about everything.

The fact that you're so far up your own... opinion... that you can't imagine that many people voting for someone other than Trump - the worst president of all time, impeached twice, told people to inject bleach as millions died during the pandemic - says that you have absolutely lost lock on reality.

The awful guy not winning the election does not prove brown scary people did it.
 
Last edited:
Remember when Republican Dan Patrick offered a reward for anyone that can provide proof of voter fraud & the first person to collect the check on that provided proof of a Republican committing voter fraud?
Nearly a year after offering up a hefty bounty for evidence of voter fraud in the wake of Donald Trump’s loss, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick has handed out his first reward.

But instead of going to an informant who smoked out fraud by Democrats, Patrick’s five-figure payout went to a progressive poll worker in Pennsylvania whose tip led to a single conviction of illegal voting by a registered Republican.
Click to expand...

While he bolstered Trump’s unsubstantiated story, Patrick blamed Democrats for casting doubt on the election results by not passing more restrictive voting laws.

“Trust me, there are mistakes that have been made,” Patrick, a staunch Republican and Trump surrogate in Texas, said on Fox 26 Houston in mid-November 2020. “The Democrats in Milwaukee and Detroit and Philadelphia and Atlanta brought this on themselves.”

Within weeks, however, a handful of cases of alleged illegal voting had popped up in Pennsylvania. Most involved voters, at least three Republicans and one Democrat, casting or attempting to cast ballots for dead relatives.

The fifth involved Ralph Thurman, a 72-year-old Republican who Frank turned in after seeing him vote twice on Election Day, once for himself and once for his son, who was a registered Democrat.
Click to expand...
www.dallasnews.com

Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick has paid his first voter fraud bounty. It went to an unexpected recipient

AUSTIN — Nearly a year after offering up a hefty bounty for evidence of voter fraud in the wake of Donald Trump’s loss, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick has handed out...
www.dallasnews.com

Yeah, out here worried about illegal immigrants voting when Republicans were getting caught as well. 74,000,000? I'll have some of what you're smoking.
 

Latest Posts

Back