F1 Caption Game - Archive ThreadFormula 1 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Loving the new rules, back to being a caption game, keeps it simple. Also thumbs up for PMing the entries; too many entries "inspired" by the last one.
 
New rules seem good to me, and I agree about people posting edited pictures just as long as they are not entered.
 
I like it. 👍
It's returning the "caption" competition to being just that, a contest to supply a witty or amusing caption to a given, undoctored picture, not a show of superior photo-editing skills.

In the interests of everyone's amusement, I'd say that if you want to post your amusing edits of the picture here that's no problem, however, they shouldn't be eligible for winning the "caption" contest, that should be open to textual entries only.

That's my
twocents.gif
anyway.

Sounds like a plan.

SUPER NUMBBER - I see no problems with that, no. Although I do check any picture submitted for the next round by the previous rounds winner, but as long as it's not utterly stupid, I see no issues.
 
New season, new rules, no problem.

The new points system sounds good, and I can understand how the PM submission will ease the management of this thread.

However, I have a little something (can’t find the appropriate wording) about the unedited/restricted aspect of the picture. Not really because of personal results from last season (using additional pictures) but because we could probably miss some really good inputs, like Omnis’s hilarious strips to name one.

Anyway and despite lack of winter testing, consider me in at the very first round of the season.:sly:
 
You can still post the edited pictures, so we can all still laugh at them, but they won't be a part of the actual competition, this is so we just get humour, rather than clever photoshop skills ;)

I've updated the rules in the OP, I think they are clearer with deadlines.
 
No, he's saying you can post any number of entries you want here in the thread, but you have to PM him your final entry.
 
so youre saying only post the final entries?
No, he's saying you can post any number of entries you want here in the thread, but you have to PM him your final entry.

Indeed, it's pretty clear.
You could post 20 provisional entries to the competition in this thread, however, if you don't decide which is your final entry and PM that to Nigel before the deadline, your caption won't be included in the voting and you won't have the opportunity to score points for that week.

Don't send a PM? Your entries are still provisional, and thus not eligible for the final vote. Simple as that.

This saves him the time of trolling through multiple entries by the same user over multiple pages to figure out which one to use, which happened fairly frequently towards the end of last year and added extra work & confusion to an already complex task.
 
Loving the new rules, back to being a caption game, keeps it simple. Also thumbs up for PMing the entries; too many entries "inspired" by the last one.
I don't think it's really plagiarism when people think the same way. I think the only instance when it came close last year was the European GP round where I re-jigged the Ezekiel 25:17 speech from PULP FICTION just after Smallhorses had without realising it.

Besides, if people all make jokes about the same thing, it only hurts their chances because everyone will see it happening.
 
I distinctly remember a round last year when the same identical caption was posted by 3 different people. Towards the end of last season.
 
I don't think it's really plagiarism when people think the same way. I think the only instance when it came close last year was the European GP round where I re-jigged the Ezekiel 25:17 speech from PULP FICTION just after Smallhorses had without realising it.

Besides, if people all make jokes about the same thing, it only hurts their chances because everyone will see it happening.

At least when you PM the entries there's no doubt. You can't look at two similar captions without thinking one might've been partly copied from the other. Now if they end up being similar, you can give the prize to the best execution, maybe even both, knowing they're original.
 
At least when you PM the entries there's no doubt. You can't look at two similar captions without thinking one might've been partly copied from the other. Now if they end up being similar, you can give the prize to the best execution, maybe even both, knowing they're original.

I fear exclusive PM could harm the dynamic of this thread.

By the way, plagiarism should not be confused with brainstorming. I really don’t mind if a posted caption leads to “better” one, even if the latest partially recycles a previous input. It’s all part of the “creative process” in my opinion. Hopefully people will continue to “public” post their final caption.
 
I fear exclusive PM could harm the dynamic of this thread.

By the way, plagiarism should not be confused with brainstorming. I really don’t mind if a posted caption leads to “better” one, even if the latest partially recycles a previous input. It’s all part of the “creative process” in my opinion. Hopefully people will continue to “public” post their final caption.

Yes, but there were times last season when captions were literally copied.
 
Well the practice round didn't go ahead, but I don't think it's too much of a concern, it's not that complex. Any other questions before we get going in a few days?
 
I think a discussion on coconuts and swallows would be more appropriate, if we are to discuss the difference between European and African versions of things. ;)
 
For some reason, I like where this thread is going :lol:
 
Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back