- 33,155
- Hammerhead Garage
You obviously need a media pass if you plan on bringing anything bigger.Also, don't bring a camera with a lens over 10 inches long.
You obviously need a media pass if you plan on bringing anything bigger.Also, don't bring a camera with a lens over 10 inches long.
You obviously need a media pass if you plan on bringing anything bigger.
I'd say this is intended as a deterrant rather than a revenue-raiser. The circuit is accessed via Elroy Road, which is in incredibly poor condition; it was never particularly well-built to begin with, and with the roasting Texas temperatures causing the road base to expand and contract, the volume of traffic the road current handles has caused the road itself to physically shift over time. It's going to get an upgrade to accomodate race traffic, but it won't be ready until next year's race. Until then, the organisers are probably going to try and deter people from driving directly to the circuit, to prevent something similar to the congestion we saw at Silverstone this year, and instead encourage spectators to take public transport. Once the upgrade is introduced, the parking fee will probably be reduced to abolished.If you really want to park your car just outside the track, prepare to be lightened by...$214.13
(In ten years, I've never used that smiliey until now...No joke.)
Photography is my brother's hobby; I've seen some of the lenses he uses that are well within the circuit's guidelines, and even they would be an annoyance to others. It sounds unreasonable to ban photography at the circuit before you realise just how big some of these cameras can get.Yeah, I'd imagine a large lens would be an annoyance to others in the stands. A typical 300mm (focal length) lens should be less than 10" in overall length.
No, I believe you have to go through the FIA to get them. They're not actually that difficult to get; you just have to be working for an approved media group and go through some additional training, because photographers often have access to areas that are out of bounds to regular spectators. It's to stop spectators from trying to access areas they should not be by trying to pass themselves off as the press. I'm pretty sure that most media outlets can write press access passes off as an expense, so even if they're more expsensive than tickets, it's not really a problem for them.Media passes are probably quite a bit more expensive than parking, though. Also, they probably will request credentials, references, make you take a polygraph test, and pledge allegiance that the FIA and Bernie Ecclestone can do no wrong.
I'd say this is intended as a deterrant rather than a revenue-raiser. The circuit is accessed via Elroy Road, which is in incredibly poor condition; it was never particularly well-built to begin with, and with the roasting Texas temperatures causing the road base to expand and contract, the volume of traffic the road current handles has caused the road itself to physically shift over time.
@willbuxtonOh dear. All appears not to be well at COTA. Garages haven't been built to spec and are far too small. Teams meeting Charlie to discuss.
Health and safety won't allow them to work in the garages. Bernie won't allow them to work under tarpaulin. One royal screw up brewing.
COTA FacebookHey F1 USGP Fans! We’re listening to your feedback and making a change to our camera policy. Detachable cameras lenses of all sizes WILL BE PERMITTED at the 2012 FORMULA 1 UNITED STATES GRAND PRIX™ Nov. 16-18. Please note that individual video cameras will not be permitted on site; however, cell phones with photo and video capabilities will be allowed.
@willbuxton
Just had a catch up with Charlie. Clarified COTA garage issue. Team complaints were over unequal allocation. Situation now resolved.
Top teams won't have quite as much space as they'd like, but they'll just have to suck it up. As Charlie says, "It's a beautiful facility"
^After reading what you just said, I'm glad Speed just keeps him as a pit reporter. Seeing as I despise him now after the crap he just pulled, I'd be just livid having to listen to him commentate.
I don't think there was anything malicious in what Buxton did. He probably just heard a garbled messages and reported it without fact-checking.Seeing as I despise him now after the crap he just pulled, I'd be just livid having to listen to him commentate.
You despise him for two posts on twitter, which were clarified less then 19 hours later?
Did you not see when I made the actual post before quoting this one?
I don't think there was anything malicious in what Buxton did. He probably just heard a garbled messages and reported it without fact-checking.
? Your post about how you despised him was made 13hr after he clarified it.
And thats another guy that needs to be slapped. Really Buxton, starting crap like this and its not even true?
I'm guessing he either heard a garbled message and rushed to post it, or heard it from a source he trusted and didn't feel double-checking was necessary, only to discover that the source was wrong.That's probably how it happened, but when he got all the facts he cleared it up 👍