LiquidFake Humphrey = Simon Lazenby
Lee McKenzie >>>>> Georgie Thompson
Well thirteen years presenting the BBC's coverage of MotoGP has to count for something?I've no idea why they'd pick her over Lee. But I'm happy to be proved wrong if she's good.
Jake is all right, kind of got used to him but he can't end an interview to save his life.
Suzi does a lot of motorsport over the years on low budget programs/stations. I think she'll fit straight in. Pleased for her actually as she's been doing a hard graft and this is like a reward for all her years presenting.
Funny how Jake is going to some BT vision sport channel via broadband with hardly anyone watching. Looks doomed as a TV service.
And MacKenzie is so much more attractive than Suzi Perry.
And MacKenzie is so much more attractive than Suzi Perry.
MUSC4EVERCant believe they let her go at the Gadget show..she was a great presenter on that...
Right, because her looks are so much more important than her ability to host the show or her knowledge of the sport ...And MacKenzie is so much more attractive than Suzi Perry.
Right, because her looks are so much more important than her ability to host the show or her knowledge of the sport ...
Rationalisations are lies that we tell ourselves to convinces ourselves that our opinions are not offensive to others. You can claim that you're "realistic" as much as you like - it won't change the way I found what you said to be deeply sexist.Realism is not sexism.
Really? Google 'Suzy Perry Thong', you'll change your mind. Not to mention the amount of leg she showed every week on the gadget show.
Saying something because it demeans women is sexist.
Saying something because it is true is called telling the truth whether you like it or not.
Right, because her looks are so much more important than her ability to host the show or her knowledge of the sport ...
It's extraordinarily sexist of you to assume that the female hosts have been chosen to please male audiences, and not because of their interests in or knowledge of the sport. Unless you think that Lee McKenzie, Natalie Pinkham, Georgie Thompson and now Suzi Perry all saw the predominantly-male audiences that watch motorsport and figured "Hey, here's a chance to flaunt my boobs on international television, which will get me noticed and then I can have any job I want!", because how on earth could that possibly be demeaning?
For all you know, Suzi Perry is a dedicated fan of Formula 1 and passed on a better job when she learned that Jake Humphrey was leaving the anchor's role.
I think you're being a bit naive when it comes to TV company decisions on female presenters.
A lot of female presenters actually fear "ageism" where most male presenters tend to get kept on when they get older and don't look so good.
Not that I'm condoning it..but its pretty obvious TV companies do hire female presenters for looks and usually sex appeal.
Its a fact that any company that has a visual medium that it displays itself on - tends to hire women for looks. However, that usually applies to men too, I mean how many ugly men do you see in adverts for Gillette or whatever?
When I heard Perry was going to do F1 I said to myself,:Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!