- 6,515
- Southampton
- RacingAtHome
The only reason why he said this is to propose an idea to get more money. Nothing else.
Golf. And there's not much to say about his success in it.How many other sports has he competed in at a professional level?
How many other sports has he competed in at a professional level?
My counter to that is that F1 is one of the most physically demanding sports in the world and there is a possibility that the physical differences between men and women might come into play.
How can I be wrong about a possibilty and a might? In this case, since racing is a private enterprise and not a public service, the only way I could be wrong, would be if the series is a financial failure.Personally I think you're dead wrong and a little out of time.
How can I be wrong about a possibilty and a might?
There are a lot of womens' sporting leagues that run parallel to the mens'. Not just in golf, but in football, basketball, tennis and cricket. And, of course, in the Olympics.Yeah, i do understand my point had its flaws, but I can understand Bernie's thinking and maybe the model might work a lot better in Motorsport than what it does in Golf
Lewis-Hamilton-with-breasts existed...It's possible that there's a Nico-Hulkenburg-with-breasts...Max-Chilton-with-breasts...
The only reason why he said this is to propose an idea to get more money. Nothing else.
TBH though a DTM backmarker isn't the best judge for women talent tbh.On the point of timing, it’s likely not completely fortuitous this polemic/debate arises a week after Sutil was appointed as Williams nominated reserve driver. After all Suzie Wolff, despite being in her thirties, was arguably the closest contender to become the next woman to take part in a F1 race (if you consider back injuries and its induced pain to be a possible recursive annoyance). Did she, after a half baked Silverstone attempt and what looked like a satisfying practice session in Germany (only 2 tenth shy of experienced Massa) disqualified herself for the job? Maybe she ends up being another F1 collateral damage due to unrelated matters, but eventually you could consider her just hitting the glass ceiling.
You're wrong.Anyone remember Sarah Fisher? And on the NASCAR note now you have little miss Go Daddy(her little cute self), but it seems the guys have more fun spinning her out.
Oh and dont say anyone can drive a NASCAR car, look a Juan Pablo, never had a NASCAR win, leaves NASCAR, goes back to INDY Cart and wins his first race.
Not to mention he came from Open Wheel racing, where as all his stock car racing was exclusively while doing NASCAR.You're wrong.
NASCAR wins: http://www.racing-reference.info/rquery?id=montoju01&trk=t1&series=W
His first race upon returning to Indycar: http://www.racing-reference.info/race/2014_Firestone_Grand_Prix_of_St._Petersburg/O
Given how many years he has done stock car racing compared to everyone else, it pretty much beats most of them.Still not much success for the amount of time he was around.
TBH though a DTM backmarker isn't the best judge for women talent tbh.
It's ironic someone with an encyclopedia as their avatar got facts wrong.Anyone remember Sarah Fisher? And on the NASCAR note now you have little miss Go Daddy(her little cute self), but it seems the guys have more fun spinning her out.
Oh and dont say anyone can drive a NASCAR car, look a Juan Pablo, never had a NASCAR win, leaves NASCAR, goes back to INDY Cart and wins his first race.
Women? There's more than one?What do the women of gtplanet have to say about this?
Would you particpate in a women's only racing series to run as a support series on F1 weekends in front of tens of thousands of fans, potentially earning hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars in income per year through salaries and endorsements and exponentially raising your profile internationally, or would you like to continue to slog in relative obscurity in other forms of racing?
Would you particpate in a women's only racing series to run as a support series on F1 weekends in front of tens of thousands of fans, potentially earning hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars in income per year through salaries and endorsements and exponentially raising your profile internationally, or would you like to continue to slog in relative obscurity in other forms of racing?
You're looking at this through some kind of social activist lens. I am not. To me it's simply money poured into motorsport and providing racing work and opportunities for female racers. No one forces them to do it, any woman is free to avoid the series and participate in any other series if they are qualified and can bring sponsorship to the table. A series like this would also create more opportunities for women to also assume roles as mechanics, team managers, engineers etc. that they may not otherwise have. I see no downside.Wow, you think a "second" series would pay all the drivers unlike the "first" series?
That question reads, to me, as "Would you accept that F1 is a male-only sport and therefore divert your aspirations to a girl-only series?"
That's presuming, of course, that there's more money to be made for teams in a second series. If the sponsors wanted female racers there'd be more on the grid in the "first" teams by now, creating a second series doesn't create a culture change.
You're looking at this through some kind of social activist lens. ... A series like this would also create more opportunities for women to also assume roles as mechanics, team managers, engineers etc. that they may not otherwise have.
Business is never equal, and so is racing.Equality isn't social activism.