- 20,681
- TenEightyOne
- TenEightyOne
Business is never equal, and so is racing.
Haha, I'm going to write that down and keep it... did you get it from Viz?
Business is never equal, and so is racing.
No idea what your talking about lol..Haha, I'm going to write that down and keep it... did you get it from Viz?![]()
To me it's simply money
Money isn't a very good argument in equality discussion. Otherwise people could sell slaves without it being against every bit of human rights there is, because that only a good way to make more money, and "business and money making isn't about equality".Business is never equal
It's not an equality discussion, it's a discussion about an F1 supporting race series for women only. Slavery is illegal, creating a sporting series exclusively for women is not. It's quite common actually.Money isn't a very good argument in equality discussion. Otherwise people could sell slaves without it being against every bit of human rights there is, because that only a good way to make more money, and "business and money making isn't about equality".
Who said anything about money?Money isn't a very good argument in equality discussion. Otherwise people could sell slaves without it being against every bit of human rights there is, because that only a good way to make more money, and "business and money making isn't about equality".
Better shut down WPGA then.The only sports that should be able to separate the sexes are sports where it is very clear there is a physical difference making fair and equal competition impossible.
That does not apply to racing cars. What this idea really says is "We know you girls aren't good enough to compete with the boys so we've giving you your own little series to race in."
It is pure sexist crap coming out of Bernie's mouth and shouldn't be credited as anything else.
Because when you have 50 plus year old men winning rounds they are the type of men showing these physical differences.Did you miss the bit where women players play from a shorter tee?
I wonder why that might be? Could it possibly be because there is a physical difference between men and woman making equal play unlikely?![]()
Because when you have 50 plus year old men winning rounds they are the type of men showing these physical differences.
Men that physically aren't in any kind of supreme fitness level a woman couldn't achieve.
I wonder why that might be? Could it possibly be because there is a physical difference between men and woman making equal play unlikely?![]()
The only sports that should be able to separate the sexes are sports where it is very clear there is a physical difference making fair and equal competition impossible.
That does not apply to racing cars. What this idea really says is "We know you girls aren't good enough to compete with the boys so we've giving you your own little series to race in."
It is pure sexist crap coming out of Bernie's mouth and shouldn't be credited as anything else.
Feeder series such as F3 etc are not exactly end game series, more of a stepping stone. All the other series are different and apart from Formula E, the pinnicle of what they represent.F1 is like that now. For the thousands of racers that want in, today, only 2 or 3 will get in without paying to drive. And that's a big maybe( a female winner in GT Academy may be something). So, they have to go to Formula-E and F3/F4, WRC, WEC, etc. If a woman can start a career and finish in her own F1 series, why not? It's about the world's best.
That wouldn't work.I don't know what the Formulae would 'be for the women series. If is just below F1 and higher than any other open wheel series, I'd be for it.
The reason why there even is a need for discussion about this is gender equality, if it was about whether it's a good business idea or not, which it technically is, just like drug dealing or selling government secrets to someone who isn't supposed to hear them, I wouldn't have anything against the idea, but since I don't think that business is everything there is in motorsport and the world, this discussion is still going. Of course then there's the argument that it'll bring more women in motorsport, my view on it is that it won't, due to making it seem even more like women aren't as capable of racing as men are, due to "needing" their own series.It's not an equality discussion, it's a discussion about an F1 supporting race series for women only. Slavery is illegal, creating a sporting series exclusively for women is not. It's quite common actually.
Wait. Are you saying that slavery is okay as long as it happens in countries that allow it? North Korea must love your opinion on this.As long as it doesn't break any laws the market is free to decide what works and what doesn't, equality has no place in that.
Wait. Are you saying that slavery is okay as long as it happens in countries that allow it? North Korea must love your opinion on this.
The problem is people here are seeing it as a Glass ceiling championship rather then a stepping stone.
Making a F1 Rivaling womens only championship is not the idea and it will never work as Motorsports fan base and Driver Talent base is predominately male, but as a feeder series say at F3/F4 level it makes perfect sense, you got to keep in mind whilst Women Viewership in racing is low, its no where near as low as their participation in Motorsport.
Get over your Backwards equality crap it fools no body, this honestly has big potential to increase women participation in motorsport and increase the Driver Talent pool not only for women but the whole spectrum as well.
It looks bad coming from Bernie and the way he is thinking about it I would say isn't from the angle im saying, but it's hard to deny it makes sense if implemented correctly.
that wouldn't be reflective of where it's quality would be and inevitably it will be pushed down to where it would be as if you look at any other top tier Motorsport the quality is high.I'd be interested to see the outcome If Bernie is for real
When did i ever mention my opinion(In that context you brought up)?Wait. Are you saying that slavery is okay as long as it happens in countries that allow it? North Korea must love your opinion on this.
The reason why there even is a need for discussion about this is gender equality, if it was about whether it's a good business idea or not, which it technically is, just like drug dealing or selling government secrets to someone who isn't supposed to hear them, I wouldn't have anything against the idea, but since I don't think that business is everything there is in motorsport and the world, this discussion is still going. Of course then there's the argument that it'll bring more women in motorsport, my view on it is that it won't, due to making it seem even more like women aren't as capable of racing as men are, due to "needing" their own series.
No need to make a series that goes against Legros view everybody, this man is the voice of the Free Market and his guided wisdom is the voice of all the worlds ''Moneys'' in Motorsport.