Lol you're optimistic.
That stream was 2hrs and 3 races, I'm suggesting 6.
Considering the times inbetween races to swap drivers, cars, the server etc, and to do interviews and all of that, you would have to have your proposed 6 races be around 3 laps each.
They managed to do all that for 3 races of 10, 11 and 12 laps in 2hrs, so not sure your numbers tally.
After every race, you would have to have filler, to change server details, change drivers and such
If you have more races, then you also have more filler, hence the filler time adds to the race time.
So 3 laps per race, + the filler time for each race, would make sense to equal around 5 laps, half of 10 laps for 3 races.
It isn't as simple as '10/2=5'
Also, in no way should these races be shorter.
They had 3 different driver sets for 3 different races.
You're right its not as simple as 10/2 but its only as difficult as 2 x 2 + 1
Awesome races once again! These events are getting better and better.
Regarding the fight for fourth place in the repechage race... Carlos stayed clean, the other driver did not (on more than one occasion, I might add). Maybe Carlos should have made use of his free warning to make a move...
Also, the Europeans didn't do particularly well against the rest of the world. Was it down to car choice, or is Europe actually not as competitive as everyone thinks?
Considering the times inbetween races to swap drivers, cars, the server etc, and to do interviews and all of that, you would have to have your proposed 6 races be around 3 laps each.
Do you people not watch any real racing? In F1, for example, teams usually get 2 runs (hotlaps) per qualifying session. Almost all racing is like that these days. How is this any different?
Actually to realistically give the drivers at the rear of the field a legitimate chance at say a top 5 position then these races need to be at least 25- 30 laps where tire and pit strategy not to mention to actually give a racer time to work setting up passes and to work through traffic is a real possibility.
This would add no time to the down time just the actual race time. This is supposed to be THE EVENT of the entire racing season to declare the grand champion for both the Nations Cup and Manufacturers Cup.
Having a race of a distance of only 10 laps or so that actually equals about 30 miles of racing that also includes making a required 2 pit stops really is not of a sufficient distance to make up for a bad starting position.
Even if you could fit in 6 races, of around 5 laps (so 8 ish minutes per on-track race), as well as all the filler, I don't think you realise how much 5 lap races would change the event, and not for the good.
Having 8 minute races, with the likely high tyre wear rates, is farcical and not at all racing. Some races were that short back at the old World Tour Event ages ago, and it just seemed odd to have amazing drivers doing races of such insignificant time length.
Who said 5 laps?
A direct 2x stream duration would equate to an 80% race duration restriction allowing for 1 additional technical change over beyond a doubling.
We had 2 in a 2hr stream, 4 in 4hr stream is no change, we'd need 1 extra for six races.
Approx 80% assuming you didnt just tag on an extra 5, 10 or 15mins to stream length and retain the used duration. That would be my preference.
I'm arguing for more, better, closer racing.
They have went to the expensive they have for what we got, for a little bit more they could have added so much more.
Do you people not watch any real racing? In F1, for example, teams usually get 2 runs (hotlaps) per qualifying session. Almost all racing is like that these days. How is this any different?
You completely underestimate how much behind the scenes work, and presentation work, is required for the live events. Even going through the grid takes 1-2 minutes, even talking about the last race, takes a couple of minutes. Getting the correct grid orders, car selections, the live stream
I would support having more than 1 race to decide who goes through and who goes out, however doing so 100% would either mean a decrease in the race length, just meaning we have sprints, or a much longer broadcast, which would decrease attention.
Are you serious?
In F1 (or any other series)
1) Everyone drives the same car throughout the season.
2) Everyone has simulators where they can practice any track at any time
3) Everyone has 3 long practice sessions to set up the best Q and race strategy (longer than Q sessions).
4) They have the same car for Q and Race.
In GTS live events (especially Nations Cup):
1) No one drives the same car throughout the season.
2) They either don't know the track or cars they'll gonna drive.
3) They have very limited practice times.
4) Often they don't know what car they will drive unti after Q or some weird lottery.
Yeah, 2 laps is dumb.
You're forgetting: "its the same for everyone".
Just make it one lap and if they screw it up thats part of the competition.
No. The competitors were given a preliminary driver briefing document several days in advance of the competition, would've seen that they had to do a 20 minute qualifying session at Le Mans in X2014's, and practiced for it as much as they felt was necessary. The only thing they didn't know for sure was which group race they'd end up in post-qualifying. Even then, they would've done practice for both and been given extra time to prepare on the rigs once the groups were locked in.2) They either don't know the track or cars they'll gonna drive until very close to the event.
3) They have very limited practice times.
You completely underestimate how much behind the scenes work, and presentation work, is required for the live events. Even going through the grid takes 1-2 minutes, even talking about the last race, takes a couple of minutes. Getting the correct grid orders, car selections, the live stream
I would support having more than 1 race to decide who goes through and who goes out, however doing so 100% would either mean a decrease in the race length, just meaning we have sprints, or a much longer broadcast, which would decrease attention.
No. The competitors were given a preliminary driver briefing document several days in advance of the competition, would've seen that they had to do a 20 minute qualifying session at Le Mans in X2014's, and practiced for it as much as they felt was necessary. The only thing they didn't know for sure was which group race they'd end up in post-qualifying. Even then, they would've done practice for both and been given extra time to prepare on the rigs once the groups were locked in.
I'm not estimating.
I'm factoring what they actually did.
In GTS live events (especially Nations Cup):
1) No one drives the same car throughout the season.
2) They either don't know the track or cars they'll gonna drive until very close to the event.
3) They have very limited practice times.
4) Often they don't know what car they will drive unti after Q or some weird lottery.
Are you there?
Yes.
All 3 races approx 23mins long
2 change overs - 1st 10min then 2nd 18min with an enquiry going on.
Call them 14mins?
6 x 23min races + 5 x 14min change overs
3.75hrs.
I think the complexities that go on in the background of such things might be escaping you but as much as I'd like to argue further its far beyond my ability to explain these to you.
This Hizal, what a driver he is. This was a great racing event, and I can't wait to for the next one.
In the short interview with him, he talked about Dragon Tail and the "Chicane of death", and this is what I like and we need more of, bends and track sections of GT fictional tracks given its own names.
To be honest I had never heard this chicane be called "chicane of death", although I've seen chaos and crashes there many times, caused by me of course and been involved in them too.