Last year, at Road Atlanta, where their next race is, the leader would go just after the final chicane on restarts. That's the first one that comes to mind for me.I thought IMSA did the simple gather on straight and leader decides when to go within a certain restart zone. That makes the most sense. Leave it to the driver so he can psyche out one or two guys close behind but everyone is cleanly on the straight to go full beans and back to racing.
Yea, I don't watch enough racing, at least not this year to keep up. Oh well, we can still do safer restarts in our racing series on GT SportLast year, at Road Atlanta, where their next race is, the leader would go just after the final chicane on restarts. That's the first one that comes to mind for me.
Saying Vettel is undeserving sounds pretty stupid tbh, he had it under control the entire time, he even snuck in a couple of fastest laps near the end.
Not gonna happen as if he's good enough to leave Ferrari he's good enough to be their No.1 sooner than later.So how many times will LeLerc get screwed over before he moves to another team?
Loool
I found this meme on the official twitter F1 account in the comments section lmaooooo
Seb actually would have been 4th if they didn't pit him in that particular lap. Having two cars leading would ensure a higher possibility to win in case one of the cars had issues. Plus.... they gaind more points. It was no brainer really.This is a track where race position is everything - Leclerc won the team's pole while Vettel lost his chance through a mistake. For Vettel to then be gifted the win in the peculiar aero-corridor that is Singapore just seems to leave a bad taste in the mouth. We could see that neither Ferrari could really follow the other (as expected) so Leclerc wasn't going to be able to do anything about it. He had the same window available as Vettel so Ferrari's actions are either a monumental balls-up or entirely intentional. Not good either way.
Erm.....have you not been watching recently. We’ve had a run of excellent races.
Speaking of brain fart, you know Grosjean never said the famous Ericsson phrase, right?It seemed like the typical Grosjean brain fart. Ericsson hit me
Speaking of brain fart, you know Grosjean never said the famous Ericsson phrase, right?
Speaking of brain fart, you know Grosjean never said the famous Ericsson phrase, right?
So that's pretty much decided thenSo, here's how the championship looks:
If Bottas wins every remaining race with fastest lap with Hamilton 3rd in every race, he wins by one point.
If Leclerc wins every remaining race with fastest lap with Hamilton 5th in every race, he wins on count-back.
If Verstappen wins every remaining race with fastest lap with Hamilton 6th in every race and gets at least four pole positions, he wins on count-back.
If Vettel wins every remaining race with fastest lap with Hamilton 6th in every race, he wins by five points.
Hamilton just needs consistent podiums and he's got it.
So that's pretty much decided then
Throw in a few DNF’s and it’s not over by a long shot.
Vettel's outlap was phenomenal. Ferrari were right with the calls.This is a track where race position is everything - Leclerc won the team's pole while Vettel lost his chance through a mistake. For Vettel to then be gifted the win in the peculiar aero-corridor that is Singapore just seems to leave a bad taste in the mouth. We could see that neither Ferrari could really follow the other (as expected) so Leclerc wasn't going to be able to do anything about it. He had the same window available as Vettel so Ferrari's actions are either a monumental balls-up or entirely intentional. Not good either way.
Vettel's outlap was phenomenal.
Singapore Grand Prix Highlights
Today I realized Leclerc is an arrogant idiot. If I was Seb, I would call him aside and go like "kid... shut the 🤬 up!".