Forza Motorsport 3

  • Thread starter RedOak
  • 3,944 comments
  • 291,763 views
no but it will flip over and show the accurately modelled underside of the car ;). Yes for some reason they have accurately modelled undersides of the car so you see it´s authentic when you roll over.
 
What fake claims? Do you mean turn 10 is lying about these features? It´s taking it a bit to far I would say...

I think what he is trying to get at is, without showing a source, you might as well be saying all the vehicles are made of pudding, and you can retrofit all the cars with skis.




;)
 
I'm pretty sure that the underneath of the cars being done was announced at e3.
 
I just heard a rumour that Gran Turismo will feature horse racing to help capture new fans.

That was easy. ;)

I heard that if you have a major accident that your car will catch fire and explode

What fake claims? Do you mean turn 10 is lying about these features? It´s taking it a bit to far I would say...

I think what he is trying to get at is, without showing a source, you might as well be saying all the vehicles are made of pudding, and you can retrofit all the cars with skis.




;)

I was getting at these first two quotes, and wasn't sure if the underbody one was also an on-the-spot claim. I know you guys are joking around, but it gets old and out of control.

But as DR says, if you are going to claim something about any game, (especially GT5 or Forza as there are always fanboys fighting) have something to back it up.
 
I was getting at these first two quotes, and wasn't sure if the underbody one was also an on-the-spot claim. I know you guys are joking around, but it gets old and out of control.

But as DR says, if you are going to claim something about any game, (especially GT5 or Forza as there are always fanboys fighting) have something to back it up.

Lol I thought it was directed to me and it based on facts. I am not joking around and I agree 100 % with that :)

And no I won´t provide links for every single statement call me lazy.
 
I heard Turn 10 has made fairly generic underbodies of the cars and it is noticable when the Lamborghini rolls the gearbox is mounted the wrong way. Thats what I remember hearing but I am not sure if it is true, but frankly I don't really expect them to model the underbodies all that accurately.
 
Yeah, just take a couple of quick shots of the bottom when they are photographing the car, and have the general placement of things right. It doesn't need to be exact, by any means. But then if PD models the undersides exactly (and they would, if they will be seen...), that gives something for the GT fanboys to claim as a win. How could anybody call Forza a simulator if the undersides of cars don't look right, ya know?
 
And no I won´t provide links for every single statement call me lazy.

Well, if you want to be taken seriously, you WILL post a source to back up claims. You've been here long enough to know that.



;)
 
No since people have seen me post long enough to know I am quite serious. And there is little point linking to a japanese interview. It´s your problem not mine if you don´t trust me. As mentioned go into forzamotorsport.net for all the latest gossip :)
 
No since people have seen me post long enough to know I am quite serious. And there is little point linking to a japanese interview. It´s your problem not mine if you don´t trust me. As mentioned go into forzamotorsport.net for all the latest gossip :)

Without posting sources, anything you say is just as likely to be true as me making a claim that there is realistic clutch and brake wear, and that engines will randomly encounter catastrophic failure if abused too much and not rebuilt after a certain amount of mileage. Also, there is a rock crawling career with Jeeps and such. But I've been here like six years so you don't need me to post sources.
 
Surely. But it doesn´t get any more true if I post any sources. And as mentioned it´s in japanese so why bother ;) That´s why I link to the official forza site so as not just take my word for it :)
 
Surely. But it doesn´t get any more true if I post any sources. And as mentioned it´s in japanese so why bother ;)

It gives your claims a lot of weight. Without posting a source (we can translate Japanese), your claims don't mean anything, regardless of how long you've been here.



;)
 
In fairness the comment about the undersides of the cars being modelled has already been mentioned in this thread and as far as I was aware was common knowledge. I wouldn't expect a source to be posted for every comment made and I'm glad we don't or else we'd have threads with links all over the place. I think the important thing isn't to always post the source in the first place (some times that is important but not in every case) but to be willing to post the source if asked which is an approach I'd suggest that oqvist should accept.
 
I heard Turn 10 has made fairly generic underbodies of the cars and it is noticable when the Lamborghini rolls the gearbox is mounted the wrong way. Thats what I remember hearing but I am not sure if it is true, but frankly I don't really expect them to model the underbodies all that accurately.
Actually, I think John Wedl said the underbodies are fully modeled.
No since people have seen me post long enough to know I am quite serious. And there is little point linking to a japanese interview. It´s your problem not mine if you don´t trust me. As mentioned go into forzamotorsport.net for all the latest gossip :)
Why would we want to go to FM.net for news? Nothing there is any actual news, just absurd speculations, wishing thinking, Forza praising, etc. etc.

If someone wants Forza news, they can come to Forzacentral. That's where the majority of FM.net's users have been reposting info from BADNED as their own.
 
Yeah and atleast at Forzacentral they have a couple moderators that are actually sensible (even if one was banned at GTP once) ;)
 
In fairness the comment about the undersides of the cars being modelled has already been mentioned in this thread and as far as I was aware was common knowledge. I wouldn't expect a source to be posted for every comment made and I'm glad we don't or else we'd have threads with links all over the place. I think the important thing isn't to always post the source in the first place (some times that is important but not in every case) but to be willing to post the source if asked which is an approach I'd suggest that oqvist should accept.

I wasn't arguing that that point did need a source, but as oqvist doesn't think he needs anything to support his claims, I was just demonstrating the need for them.
 
Why did the guy in that interview say no other game has tire Deformation? Doesn't Dirt 2 also have it, and LFS has had it for a while... are they saying it's more advanced form than those games? or just ignoring them?
 
Why did the guy in that interview say no other game has tire Deformation? Doesn't Dirt 2 also have it, and LFS has had it for a while... are they saying it's more advanced form than those games? or just ignoring them?

Well reading all the developers comments, they choose to ignore a number of games existence, so that didn't surprise me either.

I can understand talking up your game, but flat out lying? I can't really take anything they say with a pinch of salt.
 
Why did the guy in that interview say no other game has tire Deformation? Doesn't Dirt 2 also have it, and LFS has had it for a while... are they saying it's more advanced form than those games? or just ignoring them?

Many people here would know I'm usually pretty easy on Forza 3, but this one does actually annoy me, because its a blatant lie. Other things are still either subjective or speculation because the game isn't out yet (best graphics, best physics, best racing experience, etc). But saying no other racing game simulates tire deformation is a blatant lie. LFS has it, and does it extremely well... you can even download the demo for free and see it (one view puts you between the wheels with no visable car, only the wheels visable, and you can clearly see how it simulates tire flex).

EDIT: One of the things I love about LFS is you really feel in touch with your tires as you drive.
 
Last edited:
This is actually getting annoting, what's next. I wonder if he will say "The first game to feature licensed cars".
 
haha, the Forza 3 interviews are making it easy to dislike them. I wish they would make a stronger argument for me to get Forza 3 and not wait for GT5. I want to like Forza 3...
 
Why did the guy in that interview say no other game has tire Deformation? Doesn't Dirt 2 also have it, and LFS has had it for a while... are they saying it's more advanced form than those games? or just ignoring them?

Live For Speed isn't available for any console and DiRT 2 has not been released yet. I'm pretty sure of all their comments refer to console games. Anyway, does it really matter what the developer says? Gran Turismo claims to be the Real Driving Simulator, but I beg to differ. The guys from Team Ninja who made Ninja Gaiden and DOA used to claim that their games are the best games of all time. It didn't stop me from enjoying their games (even if they weren't the best ever).

I'm gonna wait for the game to come out, hopefully a demo will be available as well and I'll see if the game is worth my $60. If I feel it is, I'll buy it regardless of what some developer or PR person said.
 
there's Michelin sponsors on one of the cars. and they got tire data from a manufacturer supposedly. maybe they don't have licensing from other manufacturers, or they just didn't finish textures for the car yet.
 
I want to remember also in Forza 2 you could choose custom tires. But they surely had a lot of real ones to choose from as well :)

I mean they use that car to market Forza 3 right then it should have Forza 3 tires ;)
 
Back