live4speedBesides KY has said GT5 will havwe damage, and we know he won't do it if it's half arsed, so we can be rpetty confident if damage really does make it into GT5, it WILL be top notch.
SwiftYep, but if it can't be, like online in GT4, they'll scrap it rather then putting a halfway done product into the game.
kinigittThere are a few half-arsed things in GT like the arcade mode, the A.I., and the fuel consumption.
The fact that you can only race 2 convertibles at a time (with the top down) seems kind of wierd as well.
That's mostly nitpicking, but I'm just saying that no game is without it's faults.
erahk64New Forza developer interview with some new info I have not seen before.
Number of cars is now about 300.
http://www.forzacentral.com/forum/showthread.php?p=5504&posted=1#post5504, the interview is in the first post on the page.
True, but they're hardly going to make GT4 with no AI are they, as for the convertibles having their tops down I've seen in races with 6 cars the odd convertible with it's hood down.kinigittThere are a few half-arsed things in GT like the arcade mode, the A.I., and the fuel consumption.
The fact that you can only race 2 convertibles at a time (with the top down) seems kind of wierd as well.
That's mostly nitpicking, but I'm just saying that no game is without it's faults.
live4speedTrue, but they're hardly going to make GT4 with no AI are they, as for the convertibles having their tops down I've seen in races with 6 cars the odd convertible with it's hood down.
r_k_tekjust noticed a FERRARI 360 Modena in a video available from http://media.xbox.ign.com/media/682/682857/vids_1.html)
how did microsoft attain the licence to include the ITALIAN STALLION? thought it was privileged to EA or acclaim??? PD should be knocking on the doors of maranello for GT5.
also, just a comment re: Forza vs GT4... i think the competition should be healthy for both parties. they'll push each other in terms of development and features (damage, visual customisation, etc)
kinigittFerrari and Porsche are both licensed and included in Forza Motorsport.
Microsoft simply paid for the licenses. They had a righteous Ferrari lineup in PGR2 (in fact, there were at least 3 more available in downloadable content after it was released), so it would be logical that they kept the Italian powerhouse to entice customers.
Sony and PD didn't cough up the cash, so they got shafted. Too bad, I want to see the "Italian stallion" in Gran Turismo above any other game.
I don´t think it is simple as that. I mean, if games like PGR2 and Forza are worth the money spent to have Ferrari´s and Porsches why wouldn´t GT4 be? It´s not like they´re just a couple of car manufacturers, Sony and PD know that it would be a GREAT addiction to the series, and it would make the game sell much more.Lambo88Exactly. If they pay, they'll get it, simple as that. EA is not an enemy of Sony, many of their games are published on PS1, PS2 and on future PS3.
DappaDaRealistEverybody can look back at gt3 and say its bad and they nittpick the (many) flaws it had- but it still was a damn good game, better than any racing game of its time, and remained that for some time afterwards.
DappaDaRealistEverybody can look back at gt3 and say its bad and they nittpick the (many) flaws it had- but it still was a damn good game, better than any racing game of its time, and remained that for some time afterwards.
tha_conit just wasn't worth sony's money to pay for the rights to these cars.
Why? So a few people can play some overrated cars?
For the same amount of money, they can probably put in 10 cars to each Porsche or Lambo.
And for the record "lambo"...F&F was not popular in asia...so vin diesel is hardly the concern of their racing scene. If anything america has shamed the import scene...thiers is clean and much better than our own. We polluted it. And of course they like the cars of their own country, it's how things work. Why do you think Mustangs and such were so pupluar during the 60's/70s'? Surely just not because. Look at the BIG picture here.
Anyway, having either of those two brands would not have brought in a crowd of new people, it would have been a waste of money.
Ferrari's TRUE specs - other idea is that Ferrari just don't want to agree with the fact that some other cars - preferablly much cheaper or in lower-class then Ferrari (as "tend-to-real" prices were always a big part in GT series, as the fact we all do know the majority of prices outhere) - can be better car, faster car and bettr handling then Ferrari. Guess that something like that is just not acceptable from marketing point of view. Notice that Ferrari was always the "best car" in all games mentioned, or the only car available.
amar212...But, I don't think that money for licence is the problem for Sony. They know what would Ferrari do for the sales of GT series and what would do to the whole competition in the genre. There are other two reasons I think Ferrari is not in the game:
- japanese patriotism - GT series will always promote the values of Japanese automotive industry. Having Ferrari in the game would outshine all the other manufactorers and probably take oall the spotlights to the F. I just think that some people form Nissan, Toyota and Honda could maybe have something agaist F., and
- Ferrari's TRUE specs - other idea is that Ferrari just don't want to agree with the fact that some other cars - preferablly much cheaper or in lower-class then Ferrari (as "tend-to-real" prices were always a big part in GT series, as the fact we all do know the majority of prices outhere) - can be better car, faster car and bettr handling then Ferrari. Guess that something like that is just not acceptable from marketing point of view. Notice that Ferrari was always the "best car" in all games mentioned, or the only car available.
Those to points could be some explanation for lack of Ferrari, and maybe same goes for Porsche.