Just trying to say that some of you look stupid(with all the fanboy talk), and you probably don't know it because your blinded with love...
Wow... this warrants a response from an avowed GT fanboy.I'd say you are just looking far too hard for reasons to hate them.
Turn10 has a far closer relationship to that forum than PD has to this one. It make sense that they would be stricter with content.
I will say that rabbid fanboyisim is accepted and almost encouraged here which I don't find the same in that Forza forum. I will say that I do enjoy this forum more though.
The issue I sense is that the GT fanboys have had a shock with GT5 and are lashing out to save face. The Forza fanboys did the same when some bad screenshots started surfacing. The funny thing is that they don't think they are doing the same thing.
Bit of an overstatement dont you think? Only forums pertaining to GT5 seem to be "buzzing" but that said I am eager to see some previews from non biased websites like SRT and such.I see it entirely different because currently the whole online racing world is buzzing with the news/videos of GT5.
You are biased no matter where you post. I see no fear from T10. That thread was locked because of 2 reasons. 1, it was flame baiting and 2, it was a repeat thread. (Maybe a third where the op was a known troll)As for Turn 10. Well i've been posting on the forza forums for many yrs now and I shall tell you exactly why GT5 cannot be mentioned but we can post about Forza on here. The reason is FEAR! Im not going to beat around the bush but tell it how it is!
How is that a fact? Small facts are that ~10% of PS2 owners bought GT4 (can't remember exact figures) and there were 120 odd million PS2s sold. Take that same logic (just like you are trying to do) and GT5 will only sell around 2.5 million copies. (10% of PS3 sales) So please just wait for official sales figures before making such claims.Just the EU sales of GT5 will outsell FM3 worldwide sales.
I see no fear in T10's E3 presentations. All I see is them talking up their game just like any developer does. Also, I agree with the "bribe" for votes.You could see this fear in the way Turn 10 presented FM3 at E3. How many times did they refer to their competition with statements such as "best looking racing game on any console". Now fair enough your going to promote your game but the constant references to their competition did nothing more than show their fear. You then had Che the community manager trying to bribe members to vote for a meaningless poll with a free unicorn car which backfired on them. The image of Turn 10 has certainly taken a knock because many disliked the E3 presentation and many disliked the bribe. Im frankly amazed Che is still the Turn 10 community manager!!
Read above, also, stating false information as "fact" is against the AUPThis post isn't me being a fanboy just posting some facts. Based on previous GT sales, FM sales you would estimate that GT5 will outsell FM3 x3/4. So the reason why Turn 10 don't like GT5 being mentioned is because they have alot more to lose i.e sales of FM3.
The Forza Forum is prety much a vehicle for turn 10 to put out info abou it's products, which is fine, great in fact, theres a steady stream of info from the devs straight to the fanbase. Compared with info from the GT devs the Forza devs put them to shame.....
The hilarity never ends, you can't even look for new information on FM3 without running into the occasional FM3/GT5 thread without someone being called a fanboy, I swear to, well you know...
http://forums.forzamotorsport.net/forums/thread/2867205.aspx
Fifteen posts down someone accuses the OP of possibly being biased because "Metal Gear" is apart of the identity.
The only just thing said in the thread is "stats and actual gameplay are two different things..."
I am a HUGE Metal Gear fan..
I Photo-shopped amar212's original to reflect the current standing between the two games:
![]()
![]()
LOL!
I suppose I am infamous now, huh?
That was me that posted that on the Forza forums.
"Metal Gear Matt" is/was my gamertag and I am a HUGE Metal Gear fan. In fact, my screen name "Black Chamber" is from a Metal Gear game - "Metal Gear: Ghost Babel" for the GameBoy Color. It is the name of the group of villains you fight against, kind of like "Dead Cell" from MGS2. I just like the sound of it.
I did it as an experiment to see just how rude the Forza forums would become with an honest comparison between the two games. You see how far that went.
What irritates and puzzles me the most, is that not only was I banned [I still can't figure that out], but Che Chou edited my comparison list out of each and every post in the thread.
That makes me think that Turn 10 and Mrs. Chou are scared by the numbers Gran Turismo 5 puts up.
... is borderline fanboyism..
But what isn't these days?.. I could say I enjoy pie more than I like cake and someone who disagrees will come and call me a fanboy. It's ridiculous
The bottom line is, you are just now arguing for the sake of arguing (I recognise this, as it's one of my primary tactics)
1. The OP was in the FM3 sub-forum.
2. The thread was actually littered with Fanboy comments.
3. The thread was not locked and a ban threatened because of talking about GT in a miscellaneous forum section.
It's not a case of someone trying to get one over on you, we all make assumptions and mistakes sometimes, or perhaps don't fully explain our motivations for our comments in our posts, but as far as I can see, the issue has been addressed, the worst we can say is that moderation on FM.NET is inconsistent, but the actual original insinuation did not bear out.
LOL!
I suppose I am infamous now, huh?
That was me that posted that on the Forza forums.
"Metal Gear Matt" is/was my gamertag and I am a HUGE Metal Gear fan. In fact, my screen name "Black Chamber" is from a Metal Gear game - "Metal Gear: Ghost Babel" for the GameBoy Color. It is the name of the group of villains you fight against, kind of like "Dead Cell" from MGS2. I just like the sound of it.
I did it as an experiment to see just how rude the Forza forums would become with an honest comparison between the two games. You see how far that went.
What irritates and puzzles me the most, is that not only was I banned [I still can't figure that out], but Che Chou edited my comparison list out of each and every post in the thread.
That makes me think that Turn 10 and Mrs. Chou are scared by the numbers Gran Turismo 5 puts up.
To use that list as some 'proof' that one game is better then another is borderline fanboyism..
I will back up this since this list was NOT made up in intention to "prove which game is better" but in order to showcase the technical and content-wise differences after small amount of info leaked after E3 on both sides.
Using it for any kind of "proving this or that regarding actual quaility of any title" is simply dishonorable intention.
Rather silly statement.How is that a fact? Small facts are that ~10% of PS2 owners bought GT4 (can't remember exact figures) and there were 120 odd million PS2s sold. Take that same logic (just like you are trying to do) and GT5 will only sell around 2.5 million copies. (10% of PS3 sales) So please just wait for official sales figures before making such claims. I see no fear in T10's E3 presentations. All I see is them talking up their game just like any developer does. Also, I agree with the "bribe" for votes.
Read above, also, stating false information as "fact" is against the AUP
Not at all. I'm restating the initial point which was that rather than addressing the problem of people breaking their rules, the FM.net staff prefer to ban anyone who talks about GT5 which isn't against their rules.The thread was in the Misc forum when Che intervened.
Flaming and abuse is against their rules, talking about GT is not.
No-one who broke their rules was threatened with a ban. Someone who didn't break their rules was.
I insinuated nothing. I did state that it was horrible moderation.
I'm also waiting to find out what "obvious prejudice" I have.
I find that phenomenal.
It's an off-topic forum. Someone posts about GT5 - two threads above a 20 page "Fail" images thread - and is lambasted for posting about GT5 on an FM3 site and the thread is then locked and the member (and anyone else who posts about GT5) threatened with a ban. By an employee of Turn10.
And elsewhere someone says that site is a "more mature forum" than GTPlanet.
Staggering. Simply staggering.
Again, incorrect, the OP was in the FM3 sub-forum no-where near a 20 page "Fail Images Thread"..Someone posts about GT5 - two threads above a 20 page "Fail" images thread
He was lambasted for it being a repeat post of posting a GT5 thread in the main FM3 forum, which is not tolerated because it always descends into a flame war.and is lambasted for posting about GT5 on an FM3 site
This is their moderation style, it's easier to lock/deter the more sensitive threads (that cause flame-wars) then carefully appraise tens of posts where it all hinges on the definition of Trolling (no personal attacks where made).No-one who broke their rules was threatened with a ban. Someone who didn't break their rules was.
I insinuated nothing. I did state that it was horrible moderation.
I'm also waiting to find out what "obvious prejudice" I have.
He was lambasted for it being a repeat post of posting a GT5 thread in the main FM3 forum, which is not tolerated because it always descends into a flame war.
He was lambasted for it being a repeat post of posting a GT5 thread in the main FM3 forum, which is not tolerated because it always descends into a flame war.
This is their moderation style, it's easier to lock/deter the more sensitive threads (that cause flame-wars) then carefully appraise tens of posts where it all hinges on the definition of Trolling (no personal attacks where made).
Simple really..
The fact you mis-represented the actual situation, insinuating that the thread was locked and a ban threatened because someone was just posting about GT5 in an off-topic forum, coupled with the admission that you feel their site is less mature with poor moderation seems to be quite obvious to me..
You laugh at the Forza forums, they laugh at the GT forums. Sure you are as different as night and day.![]()
You laugh at the Forza forums, they laugh at the GT forums. Sure you are as different as night and day.![]()
I ask again, who is at fault there? Someone who posts about GT5 or the people who respond to it by flaming? Oh yes, it's much easier. And you end up with a forum full of people who are happy to flame with impugnity. You also end up with a situation where your stated rules are ignored.
I didn't mis-represent anything. Che threatened to ban anyone who made a thread about GT5. This actually happened. I also stated that the site is badly moderated so long as people who actually break their rules aren't punished because it's easier to ban people who don't. I don't recall mentioning maturity.
Where's the obvious prejudice, aside from the one where I hate bad and inconsistent moderation?
My interpretation of that came from..I don't recall mentioning maturity.
And elsewhere someone says that site is a "more mature forum" than GTPlanet. Staggering. Simply staggering.
The point is that as a mod, you either lock a thread which has been opened in a wrong subforum, or you move it there. Moving it to the correct forum and then locking it for having been opened in the wrong section makes no sense.You are still diverting attention away from the original point..
You claimed the GT5 thread was locked/banned simply because it was talking about GT5 in an off-topic forum.. This is not actually the case, and I believe that facts exist that prove this to be incorrect or highly unlikely. That is all.