... If I happen to be a commercial user in Australia in 2030. Good ol' Daily Mail...
Whoever denied it, supplied it?
Yeah but he who supplied the rhyme committed the crime.Whoever denied it, supplied it?
The lecturer, Priit Hobemagi, said that the series was a 'beautifully presented' part of a campaign that is dangerous for Estonian national security.
Anthony Glees, an intelligence expert from The University of Buckingham told The Times: 'Masha is feisty, even rather nasty, but also plucky.
'She punches above her weight. It's not far-fetched to see her as Putinesque.'
Russia's state media have refuted the claims from the likes of Estonia and Lithuania.
They have also branded the concerns in the Baltic states as 'pathological' Russophobia.
If a children’s cartoon show threatens your national security, there clearly something wrong with the latter...So that's the UK, Estonia and Lithuania all smoking the same thing?
Well that's me convinced, thanks for clearing that up Russian state media!
True, children have never been the target of propagandaIf a children’s cartoon show threatens your national security, there clearly something wrong with the latter...
Propaganda? Ah-ha-ha-haTrue, children have never been the target of propaganda
That seems to be what the experts are accusing it of being, in the links you provided. Though I could only read the Daily Mail's article due to The Time's being paywall blocked.Propaganda?
Again, that seems to be what the experts are suggesting...So, it’s apparently Kremlin propaganda targeting British children. Am I right?
Sure, Masha is Russian but doesn’t kill, poison or hack anyone, which is opposite to what the Westernpropagandamedia tells about the Russians.
If a children’s cartoon show threatens your national security, there clearly something wrong with the latter...
True, children have never been the target of propaganda
So you simply believe these experts without turning your own head on, even if they say such ridiculous things?That seems to be what the experts are accusing it of being, in the links you provided. Though I could only read the Daily Mail's article due to The Time's being paywall blocked.
Again, that seems to be what the experts are suggesting...
hmm...
But where’d they see propaganda here? What does this show propagate?Your knowledge of history, particularly the Second World War, is always very good. I'm sure you're aware that propaganda has often been created for children as well as for adults. It's not an impossible thing.
So you simply believe these experts without turning your own head on, even if they say such ridiculous things?
What the hell does the ‘Russian state’ have to do here?So I'd be better off believing in the Russian state, than independent experts?
Edit: You ask me to 'turn my own head', which I'm guessing is a take on 'thinking for yourself' ? If this is the case, you've jumped to believe the Russian State over three (?) other nations worth of experts on this matter.
What the hell does the ‘Russian state’ have to do here?
I know it myself that 2 + 2 = 4, without any ‘Russian media’, but some totally unbiased independent experts are telling it’s 5.
If Masha and the Bear is Kremlin propaganda, I’m afraid to think what is Tom and Jerry...
"Why didn't I think of that?"A cow in Western Australia avoids a trip to the abattoir because it's too big. "Knickers", stands in at 194cm tall and weighs 1.4 tonnes.
I guess she really really wanted to make sure they were eligible for the refund.What strikes me as particularly odd is the fact that the bereaved parents didn't actually see it, but the person who was 'utterly horrified' by it took a picture of it and then made it public, thereby ensuring that the bereaved parents ended up seeing it after all