I mean...probably, but we should NOT be talking about going to the Moon. We should be talking about going to Mars, which means first going to the...you know...the thing that...not supposed to talk about it.Seems likely he's suggesting that going to Mars will use going to the Moon as a stepping stone?
It does just seem to be a spectacularly poorly worded way of saying that the Moon (a lunar research and staging point) is part of going to Mars.Make presidents proof-read again.
Which really isn't doing a good job of explaining away Trump being a complete knob.
Not much will.Which really isn't doing a good job of explaining away Trump being a complete knob.
Government officials in Pakistan forget to turn off cat filter during Facebook Live press conference...
https://www.sbs.com.au/yourlanguage/urdu/en/article/2019/06/17/government-officials-pakistan-forget-turn-cat-filter-during-facebook-live-press??=&fbclid=IwAR2moEASABBJN_JyUhAHG_kBNUhzSPHOTINjlqLTiLRAGDoOhPEJNyN7n8k
Is that the one for which Gaiman ensured Terry had a seat (with the various accoutrements Terry would have wanted had he been able to attend) reserved at the premier public screening? That gesture made me feel tingly inside and I'm a fan of neither Pratchett nor Gaiman.Christian group petitions Netflix to have TV series 'Good Omens' cancelled... unfortunately it's not on Netflix.
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2...d-omens-christian-neil-gaiman-terry-pratchett
Christian group petitions Netflix to have TV series 'Good Omens' cancelled... unfortunately it's not on Netflix.
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2...d-omens-christian-neil-gaiman-terry-pratchett
It's also ended - there's no more book.Christian group petitions Netflix to have TV series 'Good Omens' cancelled... unfortunately it's not on Netflix.
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2...d-omens-christian-neil-gaiman-terry-pratchett
*examines article* They certainly creamed them off. I see no particular wafer this subject to go forward.The cold war is back on, BBC takes most of the best puns for themselves.
I find this quite a hilarious case of playing victim on social media to the extreme.
No, Hikind, just because you think you have a noble principle behind your egregious lawsuit, doesn't make it look any less stupid, I'm afraid.
Personally I would prefer a world where the freedom to not listen exists for everyone - some people can get really insufferable.Surely it's making the point? If politicians' social media outputs are part of public speech from which certain individuals can not be blocked then that principle must go to all politicians, no?
EDIT: Just noticed this is the funny news thread... hadn't expected that.
Personally I would prefer a world where the freedom to not listen exists for everyone - some people can get really insufferable.
Also, you went as far as publishing a post in this thread but never checked what the title was?