Funny/Strange News Stories

"Scrub-a-dub-dub, Google removed all traces of Bill from Jeffrey's tub."

It is quite easy to hide something that apparently didn't exist in the first place.

In July 2019, registered sex offender and hedge fund manager Jeffrey Epstein was arrested on charges relating to the sex trafficking of minors. In addition to the severity of the alleged crimes, Epstein’s arrest made headlines due to his connections to well-known public figures and politicians, including President Donald Trump and former President Bill Clinton.

The news of Epstein’s arrest sent political partisans into overdrive as they attempted to show that politicians on their side were less involved with Epstein than politicians on the other side. So when images of President Trump with Epstein were published by news outlets and circulated on social media, his defenders were upset not to see similar images of Bill Clinton with Epstein being given equal prominence. This led to a rumor that Google was “scrubbing,” “removing,” or “deindexing” images of Clinton and Epstein together from search results as part of a cover-up to protect the Clintons.

"Not my 007!!!"

Language warning, as the article displays tweets from angry white men that are laced with profanity.

And in response to one of the tweets, can you imagine if Lashana Lynch actually was a shemale? All the blood, bone and [to some degree anyway] brains from exploded heads...
 
...Had no idea that Miss Lynch was a Brit. Dayum. If my memory serves me correctly, she was so convincingly American in Captain Marvel, too.

Colour me surprised.

Also, I don't care who they cast, but aren't they painting themselves into a corner by casting her as "007"? I mean, let's be honest here, even if James Bond starts the movie off "retired", he'll eventually have to come back into the fold, so what code number will MI6 give him, then? Kill her off early in the movie to make way? Imagine the fallout from that! :lol:

Besides, even if the producers don't do that, we know this will be Daniel Craig's final outing as Bond, so come sequel time, they'll have to recast the role with another actor, and I just can't see them sticking with Lynch at all. Unless she lands a massive hit between now and that hypothetical casting situation and raise her profile enough to shut the naysayers, I just can't.
 
Also, I don't care who they cast, but aren't they painting themselves into a corner by casting her as "007"? I mean, let's be honest here, even if James Bond starts the movie off "retired", he'll eventually have to come back into the fold, so what code number will MI6 give him, then? Kill her off early in the movie to make way? Imagine the fallout from that! :lol:
Bond has already been assigned another number in canon...in Fleming's You Only Live Twice.
 
7777

I think 3 7's would have made more sense, but I guess 4 is 1 larger. :P
Ah but Bond was transferred to the diplomatic branch where he was given this number, and 4 digits, in addition to being more than 3, is also obviously[?] more diplomatic...

...

...obviously...

...

...[?]...

...

.


:odd:

Edit:

Arsula Undress
:lol:

It took me a moment to notice that.
 
...Yes, I know; it's in the link you provided.
The implication was that Bond being given a different designation isn't earth-shattering; it's happened before.

He left. He was replaced. He comes back...and presumably he gets a different designation upon his return. Or maybe he doesn't come back, really, and the Bond character operates in a similar manner but in a different capacity.

Edit: That last possibility isn't something that thrills me--Bond is a "double-O" (except when he briefly wasn't)--but then the last movie I saw was Casino Royale and I really haven't been compelled to sit and watch any of the more recent ones even as they have been made available to me. The last one I really enjoyed was Licence To Kill (yeah).
 
Last edited:
The implication was that Bond being given a different designation isn't earth-shattering; it's happened before.

He left. He was replaced. He comes back...and presumably he gets a different designation upon his return. Or maybe he doesn't come back, really, and the Bond character operates in a similar manner but in a different capacity.

Edit: That last possibility isn't something that thrills me--Bond is a "double-O" (except when he briefly wasn't)--but then the last movie I saw was Casino Royale and I really haven't been compelled to sit and watch any of the more recent ones even as they have been made available to me. The last one I really enjoyed was Licence To Kill (yeah).

Timothy Dalton is underrated as Bond. So it's fine. :D

I'm not unduly bothered by her casting. Just, uh, 'morbidly' curious on how the studio head honchos will handle this come the inevitable Bond recasting time.
 
What really blew my mind was that there was a 00-Eleven. I'd missed that in the books too.
I'm in a similar boat as you, not having read the [Fleming*] books in many years. A quick search reveals mention in Moonraker of a Cedric having gone missing in Singapore. I vaguely remember the missing agent in Singapore but I have no recollection of a name or a designation.

Apparently 13 designations have been given in the various works, with some having been recycled.

*I haven't read Bond fiction beyond the Fleming novels.
 
Objection, mallard.
Lawyer-rubber-duck-Amsterdam-Duck-Store.jpg
 
Well TPUSA are hardly the smartest people anyway. Charlie Kirk, their founder, was the one who dressed up as a baby to protest safe spaces. And then we have good old Ben Shapiro.
 
Back