- 17,430
- Corneria City
- Orbital_Goat
If reincarnation is in fact true. I now know what I want to come back as.
That's where he screwed up.Trump then called Kemp and asked to slow down his plan, to which the governor said no, said the officials. The governor suggested the two men continue to the discussion on another call, but they did not speak again before the briefing in which Trump said he opposed some of the particulars of the plan to reopen.
It is if you're talking about STDs.4-5 times in a lifetime just isn't as catchy.
You have to give those unsung relief workers a hand.
BBCThe Chinese capital has banned the "Beijing Bikini" as part of a new set of laws that will come into effect on 1 June.
The Beijing Bikini refers to the habit of men exposing their belly by rolling up their shirt.
The Global Times, a Chinese newspaper, confirmed the move on Saturday.
Many of the laws appear to be in response to the coronavirus outbreak. Residents in the capital must wear a mask if suffering from a cold or another infectious respiratory disease.
China, where the new coronavirus emerged in December, has reported more than 82,000 cases and 4,632 deaths.
It'd interest me to know where you draw the line between laws for which there is no reasonable justification and "controlling everything," and why there.not surprised, communists are obsessed with controlling everything ... they should ban spitting, that would make more sense in this virus situation.
It'd interest me to know where you draw the line between laws for which there is no reasonable justification and "controlling everything," and why there.
It was a joke that, sure, was founded upon the thoroughly unappealing nature of a pudgy Asian man sporting a midriff.and I would be interested to know why you think people shouldn't have with their belly exposed to cool off, or is it only men you don't want to see?
Your turn.
I'm talking about control. That is, after all, the aim of the drafting and passage of laws.maybe the line is reasonable justification itself?... and personal opinions of course.
I don't know why you ask, are you still going on about imigration laws?
You previously came out in favor of laws for which there is no reasonable justification
Silly because you approve of laws that make an individual a criminal simply for existing in a certain place? These are laws for which there is no reasonable justification. You were so fervent in your support of such laws that you cast empty assertions upon those with whom you disagreed, labelling them "for open borders" (mind you this was without any indication as to why open borders are bad, presumably because the dog whistle was enough) and possibly even anarchistic.citation needed
... hope you don't mean immigration laws, that would be silly
Ah.@TexRex I will not go into 'who said what' game months after initial discussion
Citation needed.Meanwhile immigration laws are used by governments to protect their citizens.
Citation needed.
So can legal immigration.* That's the justification that has been provided there, but it isn't reasonable."Illegal migration is a phenomenon that can fundamentally jeopardise the internal stability and security situation in the destination countries."
https://www.mvcr.cz/mvcren/article/migration.aspx?q=Y2hudW09Ng==
So can legal immigration.* That's the justification that has been provided there, but it isn't reasonable.
A governing body may require the individuals they govern to carry on their person, at all times, a head of garlic, a silver ingot and a pair of scissors. The governing body may justify this requirement by saying the items are intended to protect against vampires, werewolves and mummies, respectively. This is not reasonable justification.
*Edit: Oh, for ****'s sake, so can population growth through conventional reproduction within the citizen population.
What? This response is ambiguous, as it was directed at my post in its entirety and not one specific statement.I know that statement is not the reason and since there is no country that tried open borders it's all speculation .
Wait, illegal immigration is illegal because of tuberculosis? No, that's an argument against the presence of people from one country in another, however that occurs.random google find if you need specific reason:
https://www.researchgate.net/public...migration_on_the_epidemiology_of_tuberculosis
Wait, illegal immigration is illegal because of tuberculosis?