People still argue against the Manufactors and the percentage above... i think thats just ignorance.
Errh. BMW calls the X5 an SAV. I call it a crossover SUV. Which one of us is right? BMW? Me? Or both of us?
Tomayto - Tomahto... there's no right and wrong when it comes to car classification... and it'll change based on whatever you're basing your classification on, be it qualitative measures or quantitative measures.
A sports car can have several scales? Or maybe its just me... dont know... I wounder how many who voted NO are Americans... The very same ones who have they re pride wounded, when after decades discovered that the best cars, fastest, lighters, with a far technologic advantage and a greater performance above all, arent from the USA! Wake up and accept to see the truth in the European and Asian cars are better in everyway. Thats the way it has been and mark my words, will ever be.
Do you know
where the term "Sport Compact" originated? Do you know
who bought Civics in droves and modified them, tracked them and drag-raced them? Do you know in which country you can find the fastest front-wheel drive dragster? Or the five fastest? It's not Japan!
Ad dear Lord! Stop shouting! Your words are painful to read!
Going along with this, FWD is a compromise - It gives more passenger space, is more efficient, and simplifies chassis design. It is also safer and easier to drive. All this directly conflicts with the idea of a sports car, which is to make compromises to favor performance, not comfort or economy.
A front-wheel drive car can be built to turn quickly, without the edge of understeer built into most modern cars, because getting on the power will straighten the car out. That means it can be made to handle better than a similar rear-wheel drive car. A front-wheel drive car has a more compact drivetrain, which makes it lighter than a similar rear-wheel drive car. Other compromises? Irrelevant. Even the Miata has airconditioning, a retractable hardtop and a radio... none of which actually help in terms of performance driving.
Front-engine rear-drive is a compromise. It gives more cargo space and passenger room than the optimum mid-engined design. It is safer and easier to drive (more understeer). And it allows manufacturers to build their sports cars on platforms shared with other vehicles (see 350Z).
All of this conflicts with the idea of a sports car, which is to make compromises to favor performance, not comfort or economy of manufacture.
Economy? Whoever said a Mitsubishi Evo or a Focus RS was
economical? More to the point, a Focus RS or, say, a Renault R26.R makes less compromises than any Porsche 911 short of the GT3RS in terms of comfort versus performance.
Again, all subjective lines and definitions. Of course, like I said, the definition itself is subjective, but there are front-wheel drive cars above and below wherever you choose to set your arbitrary line.
I think there's more to it than that. A 911 technically has "more than" 2 seats, as does most BMW Coupes, Astons, & whatever else, though they can easily be seen as sports cars.
They're technically Sports Grand Tourers... but then, again... I don't personally care. I still think they're Sportscars.