if nobody was gay, who would be straight?PhatFatNobody is really gay its just psychological, even if it is deeply psychological in some cases.
I missed this the first time around. Care to offer the slightest shred of evidence for this profound scientific 'truth'?PhatFatNobody is really gay its just psychological, even if it is deeply psychological in some cases.
HondaKid86... because my getting married would really hurt the nation, Pako.
...in which I am more disappointed than words can adequately express. I find it incredibly distressing that voters in 11 American states feel that their 'morality' is threatened by other people's consentual actions. I'm literally apalled at this.PakoWell.....eleven states so far seem to think so.
the use of the word "think" in this context seems slightly paradox.PakoWell.....eleven states so far seem to think so.
M5PowerIs there any actual reason why it should be banned in a 'free' society?
This coming from somebody who'd be first to ban Gay Pride day.
neon_duke...in which I am more disappointed than words can adequately express. I find it incredibly distressing that voters in 11 American states feel that their 'morality' is threatened by other people's consentual actions. I'm literally apalled at this.
Remember, we're not talking about forcing churches to perform same-sex marriages that go aginst their beliefs. We're talking about the allegedly-neutral state merely granting official status to consenting adult same-sex couples.
The amendments in Mississippi, Montana and Oregon refer only to marriage, specifying that it should be limited to unions of one man and one woman. The measures in Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Michigan, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma and Utah call for a ban on civil unions as well.
sure. i am defending democracy and bush voters are just collateral damage, too.ledhedI'm defending human rights , the gays are collateral damage.
To "know" it's morally wrong would be to be able to back it up with facts and objective analysis which I have never, ever seen, except for the Bible and the Bible does not have a place in government (nor do I consider it fact, but that's an aside).PakoBack on topic though....I personally can't get past the thought of voting for something that I know is morally wrong. I think it IS that simple.
It sounds like you think banning gay marriage will somehow get rid of homosexuality.SilverzoneI think homosexuality is wrong. It is against my religion, and It is about the worst thing a person can do. allowing Gay marriage would be like hell on earth. That is why I'm glad that Bush was elected. With Bush I know there will be a consitutional ammendment banning Gay marriages. Maybe this is to do that I'm a homophobe, but I can't stand Gay people, and letting them marry would be the worst thing to ever happen in the U.S. This is strictly my opinion, please no flames.