Gay Marriage

  • Thread starter 1X83Z
  • 2,302 comments
  • 84,600 views
Since we're sharing wedding stories....

We also wanted a small "meaningful" wedding with less production value. It was in the back yard of her sister's house. It was just right, and that's what worked for us.

:)
 
Flame-returns
Thats a transexual.

lmao.




And how would you know, have YOU looked down her/his/its pants?


The only way you can tell if someone is a transexual is by looking at the 2 major female sex organs.



...and then decide if one looks male or not. :lol:
 
copy the image into photoshop do a magnrtic lasso of the face, make the face a new layer, hide the background layer.

Now look at famine see any similarities
 
BlazinXtreme
Transsexual: (n) 1. One who wishes to be considered by society as a member of the opposite sex. 2. One who has undergone a sex change.

www.dictionary.com
I think he/she/it is definatly in catagory 2 maybe he/she/it was born like that.

Maybe i'm going off topic here maybe I should just post;
Gay marriages- yes
 
Flame-returns
copy the image into photoshop do a magnrtic lasso of the face, make the face a new layer, hide the background layer.

Now look at famine see any similarities

Human. Has face.

That pretty much covers it.

Apply a facial map and the shared characteristics are limited.


So... you say I have a "remarkably male face", yet contrive to look like someone you think is a male-to-female trans-sexual? Thanks for that.
 
Flame-returns
I think he/she/it is definatly in catagory 2 maybe he/she/it was born like that.

...maybe she was born with it, or maybe it's Maybeline? ...or maybe I'm talking out my mayblearse.... still, she's not Category 2... :sly:

btw, I love the Bob Monkhouse quote in your sig Flame... :lol: :lol: 👍 👍
 
Touring Mars
btw, I love the Bob Monkhouse quote in your sig Flame... :lol: :lol: 👍 👍

Thanks, I like it too, I read "A PRISON DIARY: VOLUME 1 - HELL" and couldnt stand the irritating self-satisfied garbage that the first 19 pages of that book was filled with (I couldnt bring myself to read the rest.)
 
I'm heterosexual, let's just get that out of the way.

Gay marriage is something that should be left to a majority vote. America is a democracy and having the majority rule is how America has always gone by things.

I do feel that homosexuals have the right to live their own lives. That is a right that every American has, gay or not.
 
Inexorable
I'm heterosexual, let's just get that out of the way.

Gay marriage is something that should be left to a majority vote. America is a democracy and having the majority rule is how America has always gone by things.

I do feel that homosexuals have the right to live their own lives. That is a right that every American has, gay or not.
So why must it be left to the majority who will ultimately vote to discriminate against a minority on account of their religious beliefs?
 
emad
So why must it be left to the majority who will ultimately vote to discriminate against a minority on account of their religious beliefs?

Who are you to say the vote will ultimately be a discriminate one? I'm just saying leave it up to a majority vote and we'll see what happens. I'm not in the mood to argue. I'm not here to make any people hate me. I've read enough in this thread to know not to express my views to much.

There will be no winners in this thread. It's impossible. :scared:
 
Gay marriage is something that should be left to a majority vote. America is a democracy and having the majority rule is how America has always gone by things.
Sure is ...at least every time America needed slaves...segregation..forced internment..You need a little look at something called the " Bill of rights " its a little something thats supposed to keep the majority from the tyranny over the monority they seem to enjoy .
 
I just came across some new research, showing that some male feromones affect both homosexual men and heterosexual women, but not heterosexual men. If I find an English link on this, I'll post.
 
Duck Tracy
Not to derail this thread entirely, but if Delirious is talking about anti-gay marriage, I have to agree. I don't really have anything against gay people, but I don't want gay marriage legalized in every state, and thus would set a bad example for kids.

You contradicted yourself here. If you don't have anything against gay people, how are they setting a bad example for kids?
 
Ummmm, yeah. In other words, it's OK to be gay as long as everybody can pretend you're not gay? Or... what?
 
There are plenty of married couples (who aren't both of the same sex) who set plenty of bad examples to kids.

It's a myth tbh. I've met plenty of gay couples and they've all been as nice as you can be.
 
There are plenty of married couples (who aren't both of the same sex) who set plenty of bad examples to kids.

It's a myth tbh. I've met plenty of gay couples and they've all been as nice as you can be.

Yep. So?

If people want to be gay that's their business. I just don't want them calling it marriage like it's the same thing a man and a woman can have. Because it's not.
 
I seriously wish that people would leave these people alone. They are targets of so much hate in America today, and for the most they are good people, they just chose a different lifestyle. I remember back when I was a homophobe. I was so stupid. I've learned after talking to some gay people that there is nothing wrong with them, and most of them aren't like the ones portrayed on TV and Movies. I think they should be allowed to marry basically because it's their right. If everyone else can get married why can't these people?


(btw I just read my prior posts in this thread.... :dunce: I feel like a moron for even posting that garbage. I guess thats what a couple of years can do to you...)
 
If everyone else can get married why can't these people?

Because it's not the same. Sorry, it's just not. They can't have children, being the primary difference.

I just have a problem with them wanting to call it marriage. They want to call what my parents have and what I will have with my fiancee the same thing as two guys or two girls being together. That's just not cool. If they want a civil union for legal matters that's fine. But don't call it marriage, because it's not marriage in the traditional sense.
 
There are plenty of married couples (who aren't both of the same sex) who set plenty of bad examples to kids.

It's a myth tbh. I've met plenty of gay couples and they've all been as nice as you can be.

^Kinda like my uncle and his partner.^ They don't care if its called 'Marriage' to them, just as long as its a civil union. :)

I'm all for Homosexual civil unions. 👍
 
Because it's not the same. Sorry, it's just not. They can't have children, being the primary difference.

I just have a problem with them wanting to call it marriage. They want to call what my parents have and what I will have with my fiancee the same thing as two guys or two girls being together. That's just not cool. If they want a civil union for legal matters that's fine. But don't call it marriage, because it's not marriage in the traditional sense.

Word. What would they call it, though? Just plain Union?
 
Because it's not the same. Sorry, it's just not. They can't have children, being the primary difference.

I just have a problem with them wanting to call it marriage. They want to call what my parents have and what I will have with my fiancee the same thing as two guys or two girls being together. That's just not cool. If they want a civil union for legal matters that's fine. But don't call it marriage, because it's not marriage in the traditional sense.

Yeah, I don't think either side will budge so civil unions may just be the way to go.
 
Yeah, I don't think either side will budge so civil unions may just be the way to go.

Who knows. Unhappy gays can be a bad thing, though. I doubt they will just easily settle for "civil union". Although, they might be more compliant if they were introduced one from the rear.
 
Because it's not the same. Sorry, it's just not. They can't have children, being the primary difference.

Haven't we already discussed how marriage is not really about children, and how heterosexual couples sometimes cannot have children, and how that doesn't really have anything to do with the discussion?

Plus, that problem can be fixed as long as they can adopt.
 
Back