Yeah, but doesn’t the Silvia K’s already have that engine? And if the engine originates from the S15, why would the S15 also be noted as an option for the engine in the OP? Either way, it seems that one of the options for that engine goes into a car that already has it to begin with.It goes in the 90' silvia k. I HAVE IT AS WELL!
1.8<2.0 L, BOUT EXTRA 200 HP
All roulette crate engines will go into "original vehicle" (but you can buy in tuning shop)Yeah, but doesn’t the Silvia K’s already have that engine? And if the engine originates from the S15, why would the S15 also be noted as an option for the engine in the OP? Either way, it seems that one of the options for that engine goes into a car that already has it to begin with.
Yes, this. I have the LT1 Miata and it is a handful. I also have the k20 in an Integra, very mild swap.All roulette crate engines will go into "original vehicle" (but you can buy in tuning shop)
But roulette ticket engines are only ones able "swap' into a earlier year model or different car all together.
90 Silvia k s13 has a 1.8, 02 silvia s15 has 2.0, as I previously mentioned.
Makes a nice sleeper, or drift car, as its not an "OBVIOUS" SOUND difference, and not over powered. K20 civic, sr20 s13, and 2jz s15 seem to be the most tame. The high hp cars are just rediculous. 787b rx7 is in every other tokyo/ssx online lobby.
The ppl ive seen with them cant tune, and just do ricer fly bys, and try to bait people.
"Everyone knows what 787b scream sounds like, your not slick!"
No, because the previous S chassis came with the CA18 (Silvia Q) and CA18DET (Silvia K) platform which suffers from intake issues at high hp, so it's limited to ~400hp. Max you can have form a built CA18 IRL is 450hp.Also, wouldn't that be a downgrade?
Here's photo evidence of the engine being compatible with the S13 Silvia Ks:SR20DET-Silvia - Nissan Silvia S13 Ks '90, Nissan Silvia S15 Spec R Aero '02
Not true as I have the engine and the car and it is not compatible. Also, wouldn't that be a downgrade?
From what I seen most of the s parts ar good for +/- 50hp or so, other than the ultra high turbo. (Cant confirm, not owned yet)@Famine do we have evidence of the ultra high RPM turbo and titanium rods?
I'm really curious to see what they do in terms of performance. I know the ultra high RPM turbo on the Supra brings it to 1000+hp.
One of my buddies won ultra high turbo for GTR Nismo and it gives him 992hp compared to 946hp with high rpm turbo (non ultra)From what I seen most of the s parts ar good for +/- 50hp or so, other than the ultra high turbo. (Cant confirm, not owned yet)
There is a separate thread for S parts, believe there are a few ultra high turbo owners that may have shared some screenshots/data on the performance increase, have yet to see any combination of S parts. Could only imagine it with all the extras-
Carbon drive shaft, titanium rods, S bore up, S cam, ultra high turbo, and stage 4/5 weight reduction... 😱🤯
Thats quite a gem' I hear! Guessing another 50hp or so, and- it sounds a bit meaner according to another user in threads!Oddly enough, stage 4 weight reduction is available on the Gtr Nismo lol...I definitely have another car with stage 4 though.
Went to look at my parts and I had a S Stroke up for 02' NSX!
Yes it adds roughly 30hp and 30tq. I can confirm it does sound meaner after installing especially revving from idle. I'm noticing it pulls harder in the mid to upper rpms for sure. Yeah, stacking s parts on one car would be gnarly but rare lol. I really want some S parts for my Lt1 MiataThats quite a gem' I hear! Guessing another 50hp or so, and- it sounds a bit meaner according to another user in threads!
-That car is already deafening loud in first person (earmuff headset)
IT is an absolute blast to drive with a good tune. In reference to the weight reduction, some can only go so far, but there is an "s" weight reduction stage 5- so even more beyond the tuning shop weight reduction.
Combinations of any 2 or the items haven't been obtained to my knowledge, and as rare as S " parts and swaps are i doubt getting 2 for same vehicle is very likely, much less the full Combination of all of them.
Then factor putting S" parts on swaps.
You have a 2jz in a silvia, and you just won an ultra high turbo..
Do you put it in the stock supra, or your already insane swapped 2j silvia?
So many questions, so little rewards from this crap roulette system. Being that every one is waiting 24 hours for a chance to get the lowest prize available, the information comes at a slow pace with the games current state. 🤮🤢😪😔
Yeah I'm sure you didI’ve just raced a dude with a Tomahawk V10 in an Aventador SV.
He said it had 2586 HP and he destroyed everyone in the SSRX roll race lobby I was in.
Felt like I was back in GT5 mod scene when you could swap any engine into any car!
I agree with you, the Special Parts thread really needs more exposure. I honestly just want to know the true limits of this game's cars, seeing as all these special parts have a tiny chance to drop each time, and even then only for one specific car.Here’s the thread for S / Special Parts:
Special/Ultimate Parts
Welcome to the Special Parts thread, version 1.03! This is the place to discuss S Parts, their availability, their performance benefits and so on. This thread was started by initially listing the S Parts generically, but as time has gone on - and with fantastic contributions from you guys -...www.gtplanet.net
I started the thread shortly after launch. The idea was to compile a list of all S parts, and as time goes on and more of the community discover them, I’ll add them to the list.
It’s very much a live thread, and indeed there’s plenty of discussion around the results and tangible benefits of fitting the parts. The more of us contribute to the thread with our S part discoveries, the more accurate and comprehensive the list will become. And, of course, more parts will be discovered as PD introduce more through updates (we hope!)
@Famine I hope it’s ok to ask, would you be able to move the thread into the main area please (same section this thread is in)?
I’m not sure the thread is getting much exposure in the Car Tuning section, and its success relies on community contribution.
Thanks 🙂
Any proof? 1000HP in the Supra is absolutely insane if it's true, and it just makes me wonder how much power the R34 Skyline could make 😱@Famine do we have evidence of the ultra high RPM turbo and titanium rods?
I'm really curious to see what they do in terms of performance. I know the ultra high RPM turbo on the Supra brings it to 1000+hp.
Haha.Yeah I'm sure you did
I have Ultra turbo and lvl 5 weight reduction for the Veyron. The thing SLAPS!have yet to see any combination of S parts
Curious, how many hours of game play or completion? Either way, you've had some pretty darn good luck on the roulette wheel.I have Ultra turbo and lvl 5 weight reduction for the Veyron. The thing SLAPS!
Also have 787B swapped RX7 with a carbon propeller shaft. The propshaft didn’t seem to change anything though.
What's the top speed of that thing on Route X? Nitro or no nitro?I have Ultra turbo and lvl 5 weight reduction for the Veyron. The thing SLAPS!
Also have 787B swapped RX7 with a carbon propeller shaft. The propshaft didn’t seem to change anything though.
Curious, how many hours of game play or completion? Either way, you've had some pretty darn good luck on the roulette wheel.
457km/h with almost no wind, no nitro. (462km/h on downhill part, 450km/h uphill)What's the top speed of that thing on Route X? Nitro or no nitro?
Coyote is 5.0L. No other swap is available.I could have sworn I had a 5.0 Coyote but it wasn't in my inventory so I checked my 71 mach 1 to see if I already put it in and that's when I discovered something interesting. It looks like Gran Turismo did an engine swap on my Mach 1 before I bought it, let me explain.
The Mach 1 has a 351 Cleveland M-Code in it. That's the 4-Valve, higher (but not highest) performing version with the larger pistons. The Mach 1 stat sheet says 302hp with 5752 cc. That is the '70 351 Cleveland (Windsor). The 71 Mach 1 had a Cleveland that output 289hp and had 5766 cc.
So, they already did the engine swap.
For the record; I had a 67' coupe with the M-Code 351 Cleveland dropped in, so I know what I'm talking about. It's got the nice block extension that makes reaching the timing chain so easy. Which is good cuz the Hi Po crank shaft can chew up brass distributor gears.
I know what is/isn't available. What I'm saying is, the 71 Mach 1 you buy from the UCD does not have the engine that a 71 Mach 1 came with. I am joking that Gran Turismo already gave us an engine swap by giving us the engine from the 70 Mach 1 which has ~13 HP moreCoyote is 5.0L. No other swap is available.
You say Cleveland (Windsor) like they are the "same thing"... and you "know what you're talking about". THEY'RE DIFFERENT BLOCKS. They have different deck heights, width, etc. The M-code also does not have "larger pistons", it has higher compression heads. Aside from the C and W having different deck heights and block widths, many other parts don't interchange at all. '71s were also available with three versions of the Cleveland, and two big blocks, so any argument about semantics when it comes to GT7s version really doesn't mean anything.I could have sworn I had a 5.0 Coyote but it wasn't in my inventory so I checked my 71 mach 1 to see if I already put it in and that's when I discovered something interesting. It looks like Gran Turismo did an engine swap on my Mach 1 before I bought it, let me explain.
The Mach 1 has a 351 Cleveland M-Code in it. That's the 4-Valve, higher (but not highest) performing version with the larger pistons. The Mach 1 stat sheet says 302hp with 5752 cc. That is the '70 351 Cleveland (Windsor). The 71 Mach 1 had a Cleveland that output 289hp and had 5766 cc.
So, they already did the engine swap.
For the record; I had a 67' coupe with the M-Code 351 Cleveland dropped in, so I know what I'm talking about. It's got the nice block extension that makes reaching the timing chain so easy. Which is good cuz the Hi Po crank shaft can chew up brass distributor gears.
Deleting all the original reply cuz it's not smart to feed trolls, but congrats on your extensive knowledge of Mustang engines.You say Cleveland (Windsor) like they are the "same thing"... and you "know what you're talking about". THEY'RE DIFFERENT BLOCKS. They have different deck heights, width, etc. The M-code also does not have "larger pistons", it has higher compression heads. Aside from the C and W having different deck heights and block widths, many other parts don't interchange at all. '71s were also available with three versions of the Cleveland, and two big blocks, so any argument about semantics when it comes to GT7s version really doesn't mean anything.
Is this what you do, run around the forums pretending to know things when you're talking out of your ass? I know because I've been working on Fords since around age 5, have a storied family history of BOSS 302 and 429 Mustangs, racing 289 and FE Galaxies and Falcons, pretty much anything Ford from 1940-present day, have a passion for cars in general and research things I'm not 100% sure of before trying to educate anyone about them... so I "know what I'm talking about". But just in case, here's an article on C W and M engines.
Hagerty - Mustang Clevelands and other engines
I went out to see if you have a history of just saying things without actual knowledge or factual proof, and whaddya know, I found some of it pretty quick. Saying "it's a joke" is a tactic many trolls use to try and excuse their wrongness, but I didn't see any other trolls in here, so I'm not sure who you were feeding besides yourself.Deleting all the original reply cuz it's not smart to feed trolls, but congrats on your extensive knowledge of Mustang engines.
Way to take 1 footnote of mine and spin it into an off the wall interpretation of me not knowing the difference between what a 70 and 71 mach 1 came with, which was the entire point of post that was a JOKE.
You took this way to seriously and to personally by the looks of it. Cool down buddy
Edit: Nevermind, I now see your just the angry guy from the other thread. Way to go carrying your anger from elsewhere over to here to chastise me about making a silly anecdote about a mistake that PD made on the 71 Mach 1. Maybe you should just ignore me.
Btw, the 71 Mach 1 in the Use Car Dealership has the engine of a 70 Mach 1 is factual