Gran Turismo 7 Engine Swap Compatibility
- Thread starter Famine
- 5,769 comments
- 3,757,785 views
- 4,856
- Connecticut
- Ridley-X4
- 426
- gulf breeze fla
- lqpl
All roulette crate engines will go into "original vehicle" (but you can buy in tuning shop)
But roulette ticket engines are only ones able "swap' into a earlier year model or different car all together.
90 Silvia k s13 has a 1.8, 02 silvia s15 has 2.0, as I previously mentioned.
Makes a nice sleeper, or drift car, as its not an "OBVIOUS" SOUND difference, and not over powered. K20 civic, sr20 s13, and 2jz s15 seem to be the most tame. The high hp cars are just rediculous. 787b rx7 is in every other tokyo/ssx online lobby.
The ppl ive seen with them cant tune, and just do ricer fly bys, and try to bait people.
"Everyone knows what 787b scream sounds like, your not slick!"
- 1
- Hong Kong
- dantewong
When will gran turismo 7 be able to pump twin turbo L28 engine for Farilady Z S30 432? If this engine is replaced, it will be the real Devil Z
Last edited:
- 8,845
- Ottawa
- Automotive_Buff
No, because the previous S chassis came with the CA18 (Silvia Q) and CA18DET (Silvia K) platform which suffers from intake issues at high hp, so it's limited to ~400hp. Max you can have form a built CA18 IRL is 450hp.
The SR20 fully built should give you 750hp IRL, but it only does ~550hp in the game.
Last edited:
- 86,852
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
Here's photo evidence of the engine being compatible with the S13 Silvia Ks:
Gran Turismo 7 Engine Swap Compatibility
Bit NOT the A90...? PD have been smoking something daft Why would you swap a worse engine into the A90?
www.gtplanet.net
The S15 is the original car the engine comes from. I don't know which of these is supposed to be "a downgrade", given that one's identical and the other is a 50% increase in power.
Nothing goes on the list without photo evidence.
- 8,845
- Ottawa
- Automotive_Buff
- 426
- gulf breeze fla
- lqpl
From what I seen most of the s parts ar good for +/- 50hp or so, other than the ultra high turbo. (Cant confirm, not owned yet)
There is a separate thread for S parts, believe there are a few ultra high turbo owners that may have shared some screenshots/data on the performance increase, have yet to see any combination of S parts. Could only imagine it with all the extras-
Carbon drive shaft, titanium rods, S bore up, S cam, ultra high turbo, and stage 4/5 weight reduction... 😱🤯
- 117
- United States
One of my buddies won ultra high turbo for GTR Nismo and it gives him 992hp compared to 946hp with high rpm turbo (non ultra)
Also, I'm ALMOST positive I was able to install stage 4 weight reduction on one car I have without needing a ticket...I'll try to find it.
Oddly enough, stage 4 weight reduction is available on the Gtr Nismo lol...I definitely have another car with stage 4 though.
Went to look at my parts and I had a S Stroke up for 02' NSX!
Attachments
Last edited by a moderator:
- 426
- gulf breeze fla
- lqpl
Thats quite a gem' I hear! Guessing another 50hp or so, and- it sounds a bit meaner according to another user in threads!
-That car is already deafening loud in first person (earmuff headset)
IT is an absolute blast to drive with a good tune. In reference to the weight reduction, some can only go so far, but there is an "s" weight reduction stage 5- so even more beyond the tuning shop weight reduction.
Combinations of any 2 or the items haven't been obtained to my knowledge, and as rare as S " parts and swaps are i doubt getting 2 for same vehicle is very likely, much less the full Combination of all of them.
Then factor putting S" parts on swaps.
You have a 2jz in a silvia, and you just won an ultra high turbo..
Do you put it in the stock supra, or your already insane swapped 2j silvia?
So many questions, so little rewards from this crap roulette system. Being that every one is waiting 24 hours for a chance to get the lowest prize available, the information comes at a slow pace with the games current state. 🤮🤢😪😔
- 117
- United States
Yes it adds roughly 30hp and 30tq. I can confirm it does sound meaner after installing especially revving from idle. I'm noticing it pulls harder in the mid to upper rpms for sure. Yeah, stacking s parts on one car would be gnarly but rare lol. I really want some S parts for my Lt1 Miata
Just found a guy with nismo swapped 180sx in Tokyo East lobby...80 rolled him in my Lt1 Miata and left him immediately and stayed out in front...not sure if the 180 needs tuning or what but I wasn't impressed.
Last edited:
- 354
- Chicago, Il
- jjlucky1
Yeah I'm sure you did
- 342
- United Kingdom
Here’s the thread for S / Special Parts:
www.gtplanet.net
I started the thread shortly after launch. The idea was to compile a list of all S parts, and as time goes on and more of the community discover them, I’ll add them to the list.
It’s very much a live thread, and indeed there’s plenty of discussion around the results and tangible benefits of fitting the parts. The more of us contribute to the thread with our S part discoveries, the more accurate and comprehensive the list will become. And, of course, more parts will be discovered as PD introduce more through updates (we hope!)
@Famine I hope it’s ok to ask, would you be able to move the thread into the main area please (same section this thread is in)?
I’m not sure the thread is getting much exposure in the Car Tuning section, and its success relies on community contribution.
Thanks 🙂
Special/Ultimate Parts
Welcome to the Special Parts thread, version 1.03! This is the place to discuss S Parts, their availability, their performance benefits and so on. This thread was started by initially listing the S Parts generically, but as time has gone on - and with fantastic contributions from you guys -...
www.gtplanet.net
I started the thread shortly after launch. The idea was to compile a list of all S parts, and as time goes on and more of the community discover them, I’ll add them to the list.
It’s very much a live thread, and indeed there’s plenty of discussion around the results and tangible benefits of fitting the parts. The more of us contribute to the thread with our S part discoveries, the more accurate and comprehensive the list will become. And, of course, more parts will be discovered as PD introduce more through updates (we hope!)
@Famine I hope it’s ok to ask, would you be able to move the thread into the main area please (same section this thread is in)?
I’m not sure the thread is getting much exposure in the Car Tuning section, and its success relies on community contribution.
Thanks 🙂
- 1,909
- London
- DEAD_DULLAH123
- hyperspeed980
I agree with you, the Special Parts thread really needs more exposure. I honestly just want to know the true limits of this game's cars, seeing as all these special parts have a tiny chance to drop each time, and even then only for one specific car.Here’s the thread for S / Special Parts:
Special/Ultimate Parts
Welcome to the Special Parts thread, version 1.03! This is the place to discuss S Parts, their availability, their performance benefits and so on. This thread was started by initially listing the S Parts generically, but as time has gone on - and with fantastic contributions from you guys -...
I started the thread shortly after launch. The idea was to compile a list of all S parts, and as time goes on and more of the community discover them, I’ll add them to the list.
It’s very much a live thread, and indeed there’s plenty of discussion around the results and tangible benefits of fitting the parts. The more of us contribute to the thread with our S part discoveries, the more accurate and comprehensive the list will become. And, of course, more parts will be discovered as PD introduce more through updates (we hope!)
@Famine I hope it’s ok to ask, would you be able to move the thread into the main area please (same section this thread is in)?
I’m not sure the thread is getting much exposure in the Car Tuning section, and its success relies on community contribution.
Thanks 🙂
- 1,909
- London
- DEAD_DULLAH123
- hyperspeed980
Any proof? 1000HP in the Supra is absolutely insane if it's true, and it just makes me wonder how much power the R34 Skyline could make 😱
- 600
- DeolTheBeast
Haha.
As it turns out a few weeks later I found out this was the speed glitch from GTS but just in GT7 instead.
Player has to burnout right up against a wall and messes about with the gears and then they can get crazy speed on a run - like 3-400mph easily.
As fast as a Tomahawk but just not with the engine.
- 117
- United States
Me and a buddy of mine have been working on top speed tunes.
Lt1 Miata and S7 BRZ - Nissan Silvia
503kmh = 313mph
The cool thing about the Miata is a top speed tune does not bog the car down and is still very useable. For example my roll race tune still tops out at 261, 281 with nos with plenty of pep in any gear/rpm range when you need it. Spins the tires to 150mph with racing softs.
Lt1 Miata and S7 BRZ - Nissan Silvia
503kmh = 313mph
The cool thing about the Miata is a top speed tune does not bog the car down and is still very useable. For example my roll race tune still tops out at 261, 281 with nos with plenty of pep in any gear/rpm range when you need it. Spins the tires to 150mph with racing softs.
Attachments
Last edited:
- 112
- Netherlands
- 516
- Midwest
- slow
- 1,909
- London
- DEAD_DULLAH123
- hyperspeed980
- 112
- Netherlands
I haven’t missed a single day, completed all licenses gold on 4/3, finale trophy on 7/3, did all the circuit experiences.
My luck with roulettes has been pretty bad for a very very long streak now though, the luck had definitely run out. Maybe it’s punishment for opening a few extra.
457km/h with almost no wind, no nitro. (462km/h on downhill part, 450km/h uphill)
Weight is 1302kg (down from 1888!!!).
I’ll have to tune it some more, because it is literally impossible to get through the banked corner at top speed. Becomes extremely unstable.
Last edited:
- 387
- United States
I could have sworn I had a 5.0 Coyote but it wasn't in my inventory so I checked my 71 mach 1 to see if I already put it in and that's when I discovered something interesting. It looks like Gran Turismo did an engine swap on my Mach 1 before I bought it, let me explain.
The Mach 1 has a 351 Cleveland M-Code in it. That's the 4-Valve, higher (but not highest) performing version with the larger pistons. The Mach 1 stat sheet says 302hp with 5752 cc. That is the '70 351 Cleveland (Windsor). The 71 Mach 1 had a Cleveland that output 289hp and had 5766 cc.
So, they already did the engine swap.
For the record; I had a 67' coupe with the M-Code 351 Cleveland dropped in, so I know what I'm talking about. It's got the nice block extension that makes reaching the timing chain so easy. Which is good cuz the Hi Po crank shaft can chew up brass distributor gears.
The Mach 1 has a 351 Cleveland M-Code in it. That's the 4-Valve, higher (but not highest) performing version with the larger pistons. The Mach 1 stat sheet says 302hp with 5752 cc. That is the '70 351 Cleveland (Windsor). The 71 Mach 1 had a Cleveland that output 289hp and had 5766 cc.
So, they already did the engine swap.
For the record; I had a 67' coupe with the M-Code 351 Cleveland dropped in, so I know what I'm talking about. It's got the nice block extension that makes reaching the timing chain so easy. Which is good cuz the Hi Po crank shaft can chew up brass distributor gears.
CodeRedR51
Premium
- 55,282
- United States
Coyote is 5.0L. No other swap is available.
- 387
- United States
I know what is/isn't available. What I'm saying is, the 71 Mach 1 you buy from the UCD does not have the engine that a 71 Mach 1 came with. I am joking that Gran Turismo already gave us an engine swap by giving us the engine from the 70 Mach 1 which has ~13 HP more
- 702
- United States
You say Cleveland (Windsor) like they are the "same thing"... and you "know what you're talking about". THEY'RE DIFFERENT BLOCKS. They have different deck heights, width, etc. The M-code also does not have "larger pistons", it has higher compression heads. Aside from the C and W having different deck heights and block widths, many other parts don't interchange at all. '71s were also available with three versions of the Cleveland, and two big blocks, so any argument about semantics when it comes to GT7s version really doesn't mean anything.
Is this what you do, run around the forums pretending to know things when you're talking out of your ass? I know because I've been working on Fords since around age 5, have a storied family history of BOSS 302 and 429 Mustangs, racing 289 and FE Galaxies and Falcons, pretty much anything Ford from 1940-present day, have a passion for cars in general and research things I'm not 100% sure of before trying to educate anyone about them... so I "know what I'm talking about". But just in case, here's an article on C W and M engines.
Hagerty - Mustang Clevelands and other engines
Last edited:
- 387
- United States
Deleting all the original reply cuz it's not smart to feed trolls, but congrats on your extensive knowledge of Mustang engines.
Way to take 1 footnote of mine and spin it into an off the wall interpretation of me not knowing the difference between what a 70 and 71 mach 1 came with, which was the entire point of post that was a JOKE.
You took this way to seriously and to personally by the looks of it. Cool down buddy
Edit: Nevermind, I now see your just the angry guy from the other thread. Way to go carrying your anger from elsewhere over to here to chastise me about making a silly anecdote about a mistake that PD made on the 71 Mach 1. Maybe you should just ignore me.
Btw, the 71 Mach 1 in the Use Car Dealership has the engine of a 70 Mach 1 is factual
Last edited:
- 702
- United States
I went out to see if you have a history of just saying things without actual knowledge or factual proof, and whaddya know, I found some of it pretty quick. Saying "it's a joke" is a tactic many trolls use to try and excuse their wrongness, but I didn't see any other trolls in here, so I'm not sure who you were feeding besides yourself.
Just know what you're talking about before telling others "you know" and you won't have a problem with people that actually do know.
I'm a car guy, and wanna be car guys spouting off info that's incorrect to others who don't know is irritating, and a big pet peeve of mine and many others. If you're going to try an educate people, know what you're talking about, and don't be all "I should know" about it.
Similar threads
