- 334
- Paris
- tao_ren
- L Aristo Chat
ah yes a Spiker from 15 years ago and a Lotus single make racing, good finds but still nothing like a widebody roofless Golf 7 ... at least the Beetle Gr3 was a realist effort.
Fun fact: there's no reason that a convertible can't be homologated for GT3. The body requirements start and finish at a two-door.Good thing it’s a video game that doesn’t need to adhere to real life constraints so we can experience “what if” and push innovative designs from manufacturers
This was in a 24 hour race against Prototypes (of sorts), GTs, Touring cars, a minivan and a Smart for Four..ah yes a Spiker from 15 years ago and a Lotus single make racing,
I think most GT players prefer “what if” scenarios that actually reflect the world they know. That’s why people started playing GT in the first place.Good thing it’s a video game that doesn’t need to adhere to real life constraints so we can experience “what if” and push innovative designs from manufacturers
So the what if scenarios that reflect the world they know is what?I think most GT players prefer “what if” scenarios that actually reflect the world they know. That’s why people started playing GT in the first place.
this is pure GT "what if"
the point was more in today GT Racing ( meaning GT3 and GTE ) things like a golf VGT Speedster looks a bit out of place IMO.
But maybe I’m wrong thinking that way.
It would’t be nice, it would be a miracle.🙂Wouldn't it be nice if the IMSA GTP class cars were added to the game, with an endurance race at Daytona, on the same week as the actual Rolex 24 was taking place?
this is pure GT "what if"
Since PD started working with categories in Sport Mode, in GT Sport, many people have dreamed about the additions of IMSA GTPs.The most ironic thing... is that people are giving out because of unusual/quirky GT-grade motor cars appearing in this game but most of the people here are fuelled by thé nostalgia from the old games which is based on a boat-load of crazy concept/fantasy vehicles, many of which are highly in demand to make a reappearance today.
New players to the series don't have a chance.
There will definitely be plenty of that on Thursday.
As a new player to the series (only started with GT7 in summer 2023 and never played it before) I can happily confirm that I find these absurd discussions hilarious and amusing. And after some reading, I go back to the game and drive all sorts of races with all sorts of cars - real or made up, as long as they’re fun to drive. 🤩The most ironic thing... is that people are giving out because of unusual/quirky GT-grade motor cars appearing in this game but most of the people here are fuelled by thé nostalgia from the old games which is based on a boat-load of crazy concept/fantasy vehicles, many of which are highly in demand to make a reappearance today.
New players to the series don't have a chance.
There's a difference between cars that you can actually buy and concept cars. People want cars that are/were in production and I think that's where most of the contention comes from. We get frustrated because there are still soo many cars from the real world that this game needs and seeing PD put in VGT's makes you wonder where their priorities are.This is essentially a call to judge each car on its merits and... I agree.
Too many people regard all VGTs as if they're the Chaparral or Tomahawk, when really only the Chaparral and Tomahawk are the Chaparral/Tomahawk cars. And yeah, I hate those cars too.
Often the same people who crap on something like the Jaguar VGT (okay, VGTs, which is an issue) would crawl naked over molten glass for a Rimac Nevera, Lotus Evija, or Pininfarina Battista and the only practical difference there is that the fake car you're not driving is a real car in the real world; they're AWD, four-figure horsepower EVs, which these people will will drive once, crash, and say handles like crap because they arrive at a corner three times faster than normal in two tonnes of battery pack.
Some VGTs are just concept cars called VGT. The FT-1 as previously noted is one; the BMW, Subaru, Mitsubishi, and two of the three Peugeots also being particularly heinous examples of "oh crap, we need something for this game thing". Others seem pretty phoned in, like the other Peugeot (a 1:8 scale model only), the Infiniti (also a 1:8 scale model only; hey, who only just remembered it existed because I mentioned it just then?), and the Copen. Some are fully functional cars (more so than the much-loved GT90), some are rolling models (like most motor show concepts), and some are just static models (like most other motor show concepts).
Really, a VGT is indistinguishable from any other concept car - it might work, it might work a bit, it might not work, and sometimes they can't even be bothered to make a full-size one. And some literally are any other concept car with a VGT branding (in the literature, but not on the car).
If someone's glueing their underwear to themselves over the Ford GT90 but dismissing the Aston Martin DP-100, I do have to wonder exactly what it is they actually want.
Yes, I'm aware.There's a difference between cars that you can actually buy and concept cars.
For the most part they exist in the real world no more or less as much as any other concept car does (some of which, as previously pointed out, are existing concept cars that have just been hastily branded as a VGT), so I'm not seeing why this is an argument against VGTs while other non-VGT concept cars get a free pass - or 300 likes in the GTPlanet Suggestions/Cars forum.I'm not a VGT hater, but perhaps the biggest reason people hate these cars is that many of these cars don't exist in the real world
And again in most cases, this just isn't true. Most VGTs are well within the performance envelope of modern cars, and quite lowball compared to the various 2000hp EVs that are coming out now.and these cars have non-realistic and ridiculous performances.
Too many people regard all VGTs as if they're the Chaparral or Tomahawk, when really only the Chaparral and Tomahawk are the Chaparral/Tomahawk cars.
Sorry to jump into the discussion, but one reason vgts are hated may be that, apart from some spaceship-like vgts, they don't have an interior. That's at least one of my reasons for disliking the concept of vgt cars.For the most part they exist in the real world no more or less as much as any other concept car does (some of which, as previously pointed out, are existing concept cars that have just been hastily branded as a VGT), so I'm not seeing why this is an argument against VGTs while other non-VGT concept cars get a free pass - or 300 likes in the GTPlanet Suggestions/Cars forum.
And again in most cases, this just isn't true. Most VGTs are well within the performance envelope of modern cars, and quite lowball compared to the various 2000hp EVs that are coming out now.
As for those that aren't... well: