Gran Turismo Sport: General Discussion

[jm79]

You are clearly not understanding your own sentence written, if you are speaking of the postive ones why did you mention that the negative ones IS more acceptable assuming the mods are on the negative ones side. Or even to use them as an example of what IS acceptable meaning you mentioned them because you are assuming the mods jump only on the positive ones and accepting the negative ones.

And here is where you stated your contradiction "You are entitled to yours". Yet you inhibit the mods simply because they are voicing their opinion on others.

Being an editor in chief does not inhibit him voicing his opinions, it only gives him more responsability to deal with within the AUP.

Lol, ok my friend.

I'm not repeating the obvious again. I'll get banned for dragging this off topic.

 

[ImaRobot]

I meant the youtube comments' rudeness.
It is the general discussion forum of GTS. Criticism is of course ok but the pure negativeness may be better in the whining thread?

Considering that thread was made because people dont like negative criticism, it's practically an insult of a thread. It can very much fit here.

Lol, ok my friend.

I'm not repeating the obvious again. I'll get banned for dragging this off topic.

It's odd how you keep insinuating people can't read, or that we are completely oblivious to what you're saying, yet you're the only one outright ignoring what was said.

 

[azeeza]

The argument of pourcentage where online play is tiny, is applicated to offline too.
A lot of games with main solo, gamers hardly touch the offline or finish it ( based on success achievement or trophy )

 

[Tired Tyres]

The argument of pourcentage where online play is tiny, is applicated to offline too.
A lot of games with main solo, gamers hardly touch the offline or finish it ( based on success achievement or trophy )

Console has to be online for that data to be counted. Plus I've played games for ages before getting a Trophy sometimes. I don't go looking for them. If they are not given out for just playing the game normally you don't come across them.

 

[super_gt]

A mod has more power than a member

Administrator

Now feel free to continue the show.

 

[jm79]

Administrator

Now feel free to continue the show.

View attachment 666451

Pedant

I was trying to talk about GTS, but everyone keeps arguing

 

[ImaRobot]

The argument of pourcentage where online play is tiny, is applicated to offline too.
A lot of games with main solo, gamers hardly touch the offline or finish it ( based on success achievement or trophy )

That doesn't really add up. So 5 million people bought a game yet you think that the percentage of offline play is going to be equally as small as online play? Is there people that just bought the game and did absolutely nothing with it but look at the disc? The fact that there is most often than not less people playing online alludes to the fact that there will be a great amount of people playing offline.

Pedant

I was trying to talk about GTS, but everyone keeps arguing

Considering you only have one recent post here talking about GTS, thats an odd thing to say. The argument continued, with you included.

 

[azeeza]

Console has to be online for that data to be counted. Plus I've played games for ages before getting a Trophy sometimes. I don't go looking for them. If they are not given out for just playing the game normally you don't come across them.

For solo games, there are often a chapter achievement, so you can deduct easily which part players stop

That doesn't really add up. So 5 million people bought a game yet you think that the percentage of offline play is going to be equally as small as online play? Is there people that just bought the game and did absolutely nothing with it but look at the disc? The fact that there is most often than not less people playing online alludes to the fact that there will be a great amount of people playing offline.


Considering you only have one recent post here talking about GTS, thats an odd thing to say. The argument continued, with you included.

Is applicated, it doesn't mean in all case, or all games
I know that all games are not synchronised on the server, but it represents a large number registered

 

[GordonS]

What does this mean?

Pure negativity as only mocking the devs or product. Not being able to see anything good in the GTS developement cycle. Or something around those lines.

 

[ImaRobot]

Is applicated, it doesn't mean in all case, or all games
I know that all games are not synchronised on the server, but it represents a large number registered

Offline players for games I've noticed have been vast compared to the amount of people that play online. COD even lists how may people play online on their games, and it's not even close to the amount of copies sold. I, however, have no statistics, and has just been what I've noticed.

Pure negativity as only mocking the devs or product. Not being able to see anything good in the GTS developement cycle. Or something around those lines.

And who is that?

 

[GordonS]

And who is that?

No one specific. This was generally speaking only.

 

[ImaRobot]

No one specific. This was generally speaking only.

What you need to realize is that just because someone is voicing their distaste about something, doesn't mean they aren't getting the game. I myself am going to give it a try, to see if my worries are true or false, and because I very much enjoy photography and photomodes within games. If not for the actual racing aspect of it, there is something that I know I'll actually enjoy within it.

 

[sems4arsenal]

Changing topics here. But how about predicting the next cars to be announced. One rule applies, every manufacturer needs a car in Gr.3, Gr.4 and N whatever. So it a car maker has a car in the N class and Gr.3 but no Gr.4 car then predict which will make it.

I'll start with Porsche. I'll predict the 911 GT3 (think it is a given tbh) and I'd like to see a Cayman GT4 rather than a 911 esque GT4.

 

[azeeza]

Offline players for games I've noticed have been vast compared to the amount of people that play online. COD even lists how may people play online on their games, and it's not even close to the amount of copies sold. I, however, have no statistics, and has just been what I've noticed.


And who is that?

It s often the case. That the active players on online are not the same number of copies , but it doesn't necessarely mean that you substrat this amount of gamer to the amount of copies to deduct the remaining player on offline

Only the the dev can provide these statistics.
But we can have a sample of these stat with the achievement progression ( for a game with story ) For knowing if they re interested to play but for the active player on offline, we don't really know

 

[jm79]

Changing topics here. But how about predicting the next cars to be announced. One rule applies, every manufacturer needs a car in Gr.3, Gr.4 and N whatever. So it a car maker has a car in the N class and Gr.3 but no Gr.4 car then predict which will make it.

I'll start with Porsche. I'll predict the 911 GT3 (think it is a given tbh) and I'd like to see a Cayman GT4 rather than a 911 esque GT4.

Sems, please, we're trying to argue here

 

[sems4arsenal]

Sems, please, we're trying to argue here

My bad

 

[Timlour]

Changing topics here. But how about predicting the next cars to be announced. One rule applies, every manufacturer needs a car in Gr.3, Gr.4 and N whatever. So it a car maker has a car in the N class and Gr.3 but no Gr.4 car then predict which will make it.

I remember there being a list in a GTS thread (can't remember which at the moment) that identified what cars a manufacturer had in the different groups. I feel like this would help with the predictions. If anyone remembers where it is, I would like to see it posted again.

I think Lotus will have both an Elise and an Evora in Gr.3. I know Mercedes and BMW already have multiple Gr.3 cars.

 

[sems4arsenal]

I remember there being a list in a GTS thread (can't remember which at the moment) that identified what cars a manufacturer had in the different groups. I feel like this would help with the predictions. If anyone remembers where it is, I would like to see it posted again.

I think Lotus will have both an Elise and an Evora in Gr.3. I know Mercedes and BMW already have multiple Gr.3 cars.

The Master car list will tell you everything (sticky thread). Good call on Lotus. a Gr.4 Elise sounds fun.

 

[ImaRobot]

Only the the dev can provide these statistics.

That is true, an average of 1 million can be gaming, but it could be a different group of a million players depending on the hour of the day. A single player can play both sides of the fence, but prefer more than the other. It's all too hard to prove for either sides of the fence, but I still hold on to the opinion that there are less people specifically playing for online only, compared to those that play offline, or both.

 

[Timlour]

The Master car list will tell you everything (sticky thread).

OK, I'll refer to that for now, but I could have sworn there was a different list somewhere. It looked like it was made in Microsoft Excel. Then again, that list came before the beta ended, so it probably wouldn't help as much as the master car list.

 

[PzR Slim]

Pure negativity as only mocking the devs or product. Not being able to see anything good in the GTS developement cycle. Or something around those lines.

This is completely ridiculous.

GTS, once again for GT, leads the way when it comes to lighting. PDi are able to create an almost magical lighting engine. They have consistently been able to achieve a realistic and believable lighting model which shows their excellent car models and materials in their absolute best possible way. Everyone else is playing catch up, they are getting closer but GT still manages that something extra special.

And once again the front end looks very slick. It oozes cool and quality, the ambience created in the menus makes you feel that you are in possession of something very special. Their attention to detail in areas such as brand central and the car and motorsport stories they tell allow you to fully understand the passion they have for everything car related. And the typical quirky nature that a lot of Japanese devs bring to their games is their for all to see without being naff. It once again makes you realise you are in possession of a game that has been crafted with lots of care and attention. PDi do it so well.

The FIA integration is a huge deal and will hopefully be the first step along the way for proffesional motorsport to realise just how passionate and skilled we all are who take part in this hobby. PDi should be applauded for snaring such a big fish.

And then we have scapes and photomode. A huge undertaking that will add so much to the game for the passionate photographers out there.

And yet again the game is graphically looking pretty flawless, they have much stiffer competition this time but they continue to produce a game that looks stunning.

I have no issue with listing the pros and cons of any racing game. I triple dare you to list your cons for GTS.

 

[GordonS]

I promise to reveal my con list in the first week when the game arrives. I just remind you @PzR Slim I was massively disappointed to GT6.

 

[PzR Slim]

I promise to reveal my con list in the first week when the game arrives. I just remind you @PzR Slim I was massively disappointed to GT6.

So you would agree that every game has it's pros and cons. So why an earth do you have such a problem with people discussing what they perceive as the cons of GTS. It doesn't make any sense.

 

[queleuleu]

 

[Tassie_tiger]

Changing topics here. But how about predicting the next cars to be announced. One rule applies, every manufacturer needs a car in Gr.3, Gr.4 and N whatever. So it a car maker has a car in the N class and Gr.3 but no Gr.4 car then predict which will make it.

I'll start with Porsche. I'll predict the 911 GT3 (think it is a given tbh) and I'd like to see a Cayman GT4 rather than a 911 esque GT4.

Just out of interests sake, only Hyundai, Nissan, and Peugeot have a car in every class.

OK, I'll refer to that for now, but I could have sworn there was a different list somewhere. It looked like it was made in Microsoft Excel. Then again, that list came before the beta ended, so it probably wouldn't help as much as the master car list.

This may not work out very well, but I'll give it a shot.
It's an updated list, and the best I can do with what I know/seen so far





 

[Firehuntah]

Some still images from that gif. Car is obviously a real one (license plate), but placed in front of some tracks in GTSport. At least, they are in game right? Tracks seem to be, but the crowd is looking a bit real, though hard to see from such a small gif, quality not the best.

Interlagos pitlane.

And this is from Bathurst I think?
Edit: Corrected by GTRacer22, it's just Brands Hatch.

 

[Timlour]

I saw that Toyota doesn't have a Gr.4 car confirmed yet. The 86 seems like the proper car for that class, but I would like to see the S-FR there as well.

Also, the Aston Martin DBR1-2 and its screaming V12 would be a neat addition to Gr.1.

EDIT: Just saw your list @Tassie_tiger, thanks for the help. In Gr.B, I predict the MINI Clubman VGT, Megane, S-FR, and R8.

 

[ImaRobot]

Some still images from that gif. Car is obviously a real one (license plate), but placed in front of some tracks in GTSport. At least, they are in game right? Tracks seem to be, but the crowd is looking a bit real, though hard to see from such a small gif, quality not the best.

Interlagos pitlane.

And this is from Bathurst I think?

It looks terrible now that you mention it lol. They couldn't have used any of the scapes and cars available in game?

 

[jm79]

So you would agree that every game has it's pros and cons. So why an earth do you have such a problem with people discussing what they perceive as the cons of GTS. It doesn't make any sense.

I like this challenge, I can try!

The marketing campaign and delays are/were annoying as hell. No organised social media or pr strategy. Tonnes of money spent on a reveal where the game looked **** (but was great fun to attend!) Followed by a huge delay. Followed by no news. Really amateur stuff.

Collision physics look stupid.

Graphics, though obviously nice, look much better in replay than gameplay, from what I can tell. That LOD resolving thing is ugly as hell.

Not as many old cars as I'd like, way too many duplicates.

There's more, I'm sure!

 

[Zlork]

Interlagos is definitely confirmed ! I hope we will have real photos at Gamescom

Graphics, though obviously nice, look much better in replay than gameplay, from what I can tell.

I don't agree Gameplay and Replay is exactly the same. If you look the replay in cokpit view or other playable view, you will not see any difference except maybe the blur. If the replay seems to you prettier, it's because there are several sources of lighting with the third person view.