Good luck to whoever accepts that job, I sense lots of whining and moaning going their way because PD didn't include a certain car or track.
You know what, I need to follow this up with a thought. In an article I read recently, it was mentioned that the reason tuning was taken away was directly related to the fact that the younger generation has no earthly clue how an LSD functions or Down Force, or any other mechanical characteristic of a RACE car. So are we raising idiots? Shouldn’t they have a great forum to learn? And thereby create smarter people?
In an article I read recently, it was mentioned that the reason tuning was taken away was directly related to the fact that the younger generation has no earthly clue how an LSD functions or Down Force, or any other mechanical characteristic of a RACE car. So are we raising idiots?
The biggest issue for tuning is that GT needs to, and does, appeal to people who want to pick up and play. Project Cars doesn't, and sales suffer as a result.
I totally see your point and do agree with the logic behind it. I think you also understand where I’m coming from. I like the idea of longer races with tuning on. That would be awesome.Dude,most people who drive in real life has no idea how to tune a car in Gran Turismo,its not only a kids problem,it's a casual player problem.PD thought it would give a unfair advantage in the races which is fair.But i do think there should be a separate race slot, Race D,it would be longer races with tuning on.
Also this,GT became popular because of casual players who had no idea how to tune their car but enjoyed the game anyway(because you didn't need to setup your car to beat an AI in GT4).
I read it here , it was an interview with GTplanet and Kaz. I can dig it up but it will take a minuteSame with all games really. GTA5 facebook page is a classic example. There isn't any content locked behind DLC and it isn't pay to win(although the economy is questionable) and people will still complain, despite most vehicles on peoples wishlists ending up on the game at some point or another.
The issue I see with a social media manager for PD is that unless they are empowered to ask people for feedback then I don't see it being particularly valuable to the player base - unless PD are more open about upcoming content.
Where did you read this? I am curious.
The issue I have with tuning is that the descriptions for adjustments and their expected effects could be communicated better.
I've felt historically that GT has been pretty poor in describing what each component adjustment actually does, and then critically linking that description to the numbers in front of the player. GT Sport is an improvement on previous games in this regard, but it could be better.
Some settings also don't make sense, like rear bias brakes making the Huracan Gr4 understeer.
The biggest issue for tuning is that GT needs to, and does, appeal to people who want to pick up and play. Project Cars doesn't, and sales suffer as a result.
I totally see your point and do agree with the logic behind it. I think you also understand where I’m coming from. I like the idea of longer races with tuning on. That would be awesome.
The lack of tuning for sport mode is down to taking one variable out of the equation for races and putting more focus on the driver's ability.
Also makes BoP easier to deal with, although there are cars that suffer because the default setup doesn't work well for it.
Question: What are the benefits for doing Daily races? Do they increase your ranking or something?
GT sponsoring a Super Formula car
Would be nice to see this car in GT
Doesn't GT have a sponsorship or something with Pikes Peak? I remember the Bentley Bentayga had the windshield graphic. And there was a GT3 RS with one too at Goodwood last year.
I think it did.Yeah I see it often. Didn't the VW Pikes Peak record setter have the Gran Turismo window banner
Not like it would be able to race against anything else anyway.Then again it would only be a mere Gr. X car...
Then again it would only be a mere Gr. X car...
No, they have one car with two engine suppliers.Super fomurla only have Honda and Toyota. They could get second car and it would be still be interesting than one car in the grid.
Yeah it did. I think because it was the fastest SUV on Pikes Peak with a time of 10 Minutes and 49 seconds. The Bentayga would be AWESOME!I remember the Bentley Bentayga had the windshield graphic.
How about having option choosing engine supplier in the game.No, they have one car with two engine suppliers.
Performance is near identical. They could just offer a single car with option for Toyota or Honda. Much like you choose team cars after buying a race car.How about having option choosing engine supplier in the game.
Dam just another group x carPerformance is near identical. They could just offer a single car with option for Toyota or Honda. Much like you choose team cars after buying a race car.
Community could paint the rest of the SF grid.
Huh?? What else were you planning to race it against??Dam just another group x car
Knowing PD, I'm sure they're going to sound very similar if both of them do exist in-game.How about having option choosing engine supplier in the game.
GTS FiA event in Paris from 14th March - 18th March
View attachment 801053