Alrighty, this should be fun.
Let's start with this:
@RACECAR simply asked for clarification. "Play the game" isn't really an answer: if it was, we'd all be in utter agreement. About everything, ever. It's why I made reference to a certain Opinions & Current Event thread: stating something roughly equivalent to "do this thing and you'll reach the same conclusion" simply does not work with subjective topics.
Imagine Greatbee's post (and general statement) with literally any other game standing in for GT. Why stop there – replace "play GT" with "eat apples" or "run a marathon". I love me some salmon, but if someone asks me why I like it, "try it and you'll understand" tells them precisely zip.
This isn't the first time you've made this claim, so let's just look at the exchange I've started this post off with.
Now, point to the part of the post the bad old
@RACECAR told him he was wrong.
"Exact same guys"? Shouldn't be too hard to dig up if that's the case.
Why do you repeatedly take this so personally? It's obvious you do considering the mention of PCARS and Dirt Rally at the end there. Do you hope that fans of those titles will take a similar, personal offence to these comments? It's all very bizarre, especially from someone who is complaining that the GT Sport section should exclusively be about GT Sport.
It's also been mentioned before, but "this other game also does X feature poorly" is a horrible excuse for a feature to be developed poorly in the subject title! I don't think you'll find many arguing that a poor damage model is acceptable in all titles other than GT.
I see a difference: you are literally blowing things out of proportion. I'm not sure if it's a language barrier issue or something else (it very well could be), but you can't seem to separate criticism from "hate".
"Soon".