Maybe a new release date to fool us all?
They will announce the new release date when GTS will be really ready.
Maybe a new release date to fool us all?
They will announce the new release date when GTS will be really ready.
What I don't understand is why GTSport trailers look so sad? I know it's honest from Poly but a trailer with aliasing, glitchy shadows and half-finished tracks... We went from crazy trailers in GT5 (big big bullshots^^) to this. I don't see why they keep showing GTSport given pre-orders are closed !
I didn't say new stuff either man I just said stuff.
They will announce the new release date when GTS will be really ready.
What's your guess?
They said they would continue to exhibit the game and at some point will have new experiences for people to try, they didn't say they'd have new stuff to show only a fortnight later. I mean I could be wrong but you're setting yourself up for disappointment IMO. You don't go from delay announcement to "check out all this new stuff" in two weeks.
Were they really ready when they announced the last release date or 99% ready?They will announce the new release date when GTS will be really ready.
Were they really ready when they announced the last release date or 99% ready?
Did I ask for a source?Yeah come on @Zlork, shape up - JP always needs sources or proof for vague optimism. Get with the programme
Lol
In other news, I somehow only just noticed that Kaz directly mentions PBR in the delay update:
"From the start, the title has been one of our most ambitious undertakings, using the latest technologies, such as physics-based rendering and sound simulations"
Is that the 1st mention of this? Or am I just being dumb/inattentive?
Yes, you're right. First confirmation they're actually doing that, up to now it was just assumption.
I don't know. More in-depth stuffWell what stuff could they show that wasn't new but give us something to talk about? It was kinda inferred it would be new.
Does that verify the theory that they couldn't just import the PS3 premiums because of PBR then?
Who is the GTP expert on this? @TrevorPhilips ...? I can't remember...
It was one of my points yes, there are other points too. But you know, some people here believe they would have looked just as good with a straight up port. They wouldn't have by any stretch, they would look flatter than flat when standing next to a car with full PBR, but you can't tell these people. Internet for you, they need to be spoon fed this information instead of using their own eyes.
We can't do this in GT6.Wasn't that view in GT5?
That's the sad part. PD had issues with GT6 so space/memory issues?We can't do this in GT6.
PD/Sony get to pick which car they want. Do you think PD/Sony would want a Altima?I have no idea.
On another front. I just qrealised, this is the only game where we can drive a GT-R GT3. Feels like PD has the only licence for this car. That's how I felt about the Altima Supercar. However, that car is in FM6(along with the Super GT GT500 GT-R). What gives?
Ah cheers man, so it is a major thing then? I have very little idea of how it works...
PD/Sony get to pick which car they want. Do you think PD/Sony would want a Altima?
No.
The Altima has been promoting GT Academy for two years. Why wouldn't it be in the game?
Point is, is the GT-R only exclusive to PD?
Yeah come on @Zlork, shape up - JP always needs sources or proof for vague optimism. Get with the programme
Deep.Naw, it was just funny how certain he was that Polyphony had all their ducks in a row. Polyphonical ducks are never in a row. It's something to do with their innate magnetic point charges interacting with the dynamic resonance of the squalosphere.
Naw, it was just funny how certain he was that Polyphony had all their ducks in a row. Polyphonical ducks are never in a row. It's something to do with their innate magnetic point charges interacting with the dynamic resonance of the squalosphere.
You know, this is a good point. Leading up to GT5 I wasn't paying attention to anything about the game, wasn't on here. Caught the odd bit of news on game sites, that was it. But in the back of my mind, I knew that as soon as the new Gran Turismo was released, instant buy.
Ended up playing it a lot, and really liked it, because I wasn't aware of, and didn't care about delays, broken 'promises', weird powerpoint slides, premiums, sales figures, etc
It was simply the new Gran Turismo on a new console.
Disclaimer : I have zero knowledge about technical stuff. I believe it's not a matter of geometry. Some GT5 cars need here and there more polygons but how the light interacts with cars. Poly couldn't predict that PBR will be the new king and they must redo every shaders.Which perplexed me with modeling the cars. I thought he said it was easier to port over the future proofed cars. Then, says we will build them from scratch. Let's say they have all the cars ready. Something else is holding them back.
Can it be strictly gameplay?
We can only guess what is holding them back. My money would be on locking in the 60 fps target for VR and possibly something to do with what, IMO, is a lukewarm reception to the idea of a stripped down GT game that highly favours online competition.Which perplexed me with modeling the cars. I thought he said it was easier to port over the future proofed cars. Then, says we will build them from scratch. Let's say they have all the cars ready. Something else is holding them back.
Can it be strictly gameplay?
But it's their choice to do it for this game and not the next one. The problem is that technology continues to move forward. GTS could be innovative/different enough without it IMO. Hell, they could do a GTS with current assets/tech AND a GT7 with new technology.Poly couldn't predict that PBR will be the new king and they must redo every shaders.