It's the key to GT Sport's success. It could add lots more content, which is good since the majority is underwhelmed by the quantity in GTS.
There's a big chance that most of the post launch tracks (if there will be any in the first place) will be FIA certified tracks like Spa, Monza, Red Bull Ring, Silverstone and many more. These tracks I just mentioned were tracks that were featured in GT5 and/or GT6. And there's no way that Grand Valley, Trial Mountain and Deep Forest won't be added post launch. Hell, even Midfield and Apricott should and could be added if (enough) tracks will be added.
And where's Laguna Seca?! It's the first bloody real world track to ever be featured in a GT game!
Like I keep thinking I'm going to wake from a bad dream and they're going to announce, "Oh, of course we're going to have all the tracks from GT6 as well, we were just talking about some of the interesting new things were adding."I feel PD are only making new original tracks as a new chapter to the series.
Something I find especially odd:
The very first line of dialogue: "We first met along the straights of Grand Valley..." - they recognize the incredible relevance of the classic original tracks have had in the series since day one, but they don't include them? Especially with the game being so esports-heavy, you'd think these tracks would be in for all of the coverage and the very real history that's been built out of a digital world - but no. I've only been playing since GT5 but this logic baffles me.
There's all sorts of other stuff that's been rubbing me wrong with this trailer since it came out, much to do with it not seeming to follow any sorts of complaints I remember seeing people make about the series - but that doesn't really follow the topic of this thread.
I'm very glad if Suzuka Circuit West Course comes back, but I think in reality it's Nurburgring GP/D or typeV layout.My predictions for the last three layouts of the game are:
Suzuka Circuit:
1. West Circuit
Tokyo:
1. Tokyo Expressway- Central Inner Loop (Unofficial, not yet announced)
2. Tokyo Expressway- East Inner Loop (Unofficial, not yet announced)
I think GTS would have felt awfully same-y if we would have gotten the same ol' HSR, DFR, TM, GV, etc. Of course, I enjoy them, but I am really looking forward to the new-car-smell with PD's PS4 debut.
I love the track list even if I would have liked less oval circuits. La Sarthe or SPA Francorchamp instead of Nothern Isles Speedway, for example. But I think they will come via DLC so I don't worry.
What I really like is the novelty. I was afraid that PoDi would put Trial Mountain or Deep Forest again and again. So I'm glad they're creating new tracks. They have a lot of talent for that. Dragon Trails or Tokyo Expressway are already very sympathic !
This is the first Gran Turismo title on PS4. Looking back at the past, the first title GT3 in PS2 is 18 locations, the first title in PS1 is 8 locations in GT1.
What matters now is to make a basis for the new generation of Gran Turismo, the track/car lists can be added at a later time, and that will be the case indeed.
Except the PS4 will be almost 4 years old by the time of GT Sports release date. The game has probably been in development for at least 5 years, and they have a small track list to show for it. How long will we have to wait for them to come up with a healthy number of more tracks?
Why not both? I loved GT1 because it was some sportcars like the FTO on Grand Valley, Deep Forest.
GT6 released Dec. 5th, 2013 - what makes you think they've been developing for at least 5 years? If anything the development time would be 3 years and 10 months (assuming they stick to this 2017 release date).
Because they start development of the next title as soon as the previous one is released.GT6 released Dec. 5th, 2013 - what makes you think they've been developing for at least 5 years? If anything the development time would be 3 years and 10 months (assuming they stick to this 2017 release date).
The list is weak by market standards.
Everything, short of Mario Kart has a better track list.
What is it with some of you and the 'it's okay, they'll have DLC in the years to come.'?
Was GT6 that long ago that you forget? It sucked. It was topped off by the track creator by only using a tablet debacle...so weak!
Why have standards dropped to the point of accepting poo and calling it sirloin with GT?
Is it just GT, PD & Kaz, or is it like that with everything in some peoples lives? ....is it just low standards or expectations?
Because they start development of the next title as soon as the previous one is released.
In all that time. THIS is all they can come up with? Then what? You can pay extra for the stuff that should have been in this game at release? Good luck with that given PD's previous track record. This franchise is dead in the water.
I think there is a such thing as being disappointed in the quantity of tracks, while at the same time being excited about the tracks that are present (without being referred to as a fan-girl).
Yeah, but he said 5 years. As it stands, GT Sport will release at 3 years, 10 months from GT6.
The list is weak by market standards.
Everything, short of Mario Kart has a better track list.
What is it with some of you and the 'it's okay, they'll have DLC in the years to come.'?
Was GT6 that long ago that you forget? It sucked. It was topped off by the track creator by only using a tablet debacle...so weak!
Why have standards dropped to the point of accepting poo and calling it sirloin with GT?
Is it just GT, PD & Kaz, or is it like that with everything in some peoples lives? ....is it just low standards or expectations?