GT Racing - GT1, GT3, Blancpain Endurance Series & National GT SeriesSports Cars 

Not a bad effort from the Marc VDS BMW I must say. Started from the back of the grid ended up being in 2nd place and could've been a victory if not getting stuck behind a lot of traffic.
 
Well, the GT1 series has become a joke. After very nearly not starting at all, the original ten-round calendar has been cut back to seven races with the removal of the Korean, Beijing and Ordos rounds. The organisers are apparently planning to replace the two races in China with events in Europe, but they tried the same thing when Korea was removed from the schedule and failed. Meanwhile, five rounds in and Sunred have not yet entered their second car (which was supposed to be ready for the first race at Nogaro), and they only seem to be able to get fourteen cars – when they are supposed to have eighteen (and were originally aiming for at least twenty) – to race at any one time; in addition to one Sunred Ford GT not racing at Algarve this weekend, Valmon Russia and one of the Exim 911s have not entered. And none of these cars are actually pure GT1 cars, but GT3 cars re-tuned to GT1 performance levels after the whole “GT World” concept failed (which arguably set this entire farce in motion). And to cap it all off, I’ve heard talk that the FIA is on the verge of revoking the series “World Championship” status – if they haven’t done so already.

What, exactly, is Stéphane Ratel doing?
 
The organisers might be better off abandoning the 2013 championship and picking it up again in 2014. It's a risk, but the series is in serious disarray. They need a stable calendar and a stable team roster. And I'd also look at getting rid of the driver change requirement, and have one driver per car.

Another idea that I had would be to change the qualifying race format. It's really just a race that decides the grid for the championship race. If they really want a qualifying "race" then they could maybe open up the qualifying session to free running. But rather than basing the grid on one timed lap, they could base it on several. After one hour, each driver's five fastest laps are added together, and the fastest overall time wins, and starts the championship race from pole. It might not be a perfect setup, but at least it would be a unique format that rewards consistent speed and strategy (do you fuel the car light for five flying laps, or do you go heavy and do one long run of ten laps and take the best five times?) and it might be something that restores crediblity to the series.
 
Well, the GT1 series has become a joke. After very nearly not starting at all, the original ten-round calendar has been cut back to seven races with the removal of the Korean, Beijing and Ordos rounds. The organisers are apparently planning to replace the two races in China with events in Europe, but they tried the same thing when Korea was removed from the schedule and failed. Meanwhile, five rounds in and Sunred have not yet entered their second car (which was supposed to be ready for the first race at Nogaro), and they only seem to be able to get fourteen cars – when they are supposed to have eighteen (and were originally aiming for at least twenty) – to race at any one time; in addition to one Sunred Ford GT not racing at Algarve this weekend, Valmon Russia and one of the Exim 911s have not entered. And none of these cars are actually pure GT1 cars, but GT3 cars re-tuned to GT1 performance levels after the whole “GT World” concept failed (which arguably set this entire farce in motion). And to cap it all off, I’ve heard talk that the FIA is on the verge of revoking the series “World Championship” status – if they haven’t done so already.

What, exactly, is Stéphane Ratel doing?

Ratel? Apart from emptying GT3 to get entrants in GT1, nothing sensible.

Even when teams show him what they want with massive entries in the BES endurance series, he still persists in this one hour sprint format.

The GT cars in GT1 are not tuned differently. There was a plan to give them more horsepower but I haven't heard of it being implemented.

It never should have been a World Championship this year. It didn't visit enough continents in the first place. It's just silly now.

They will revoke it unless they have twenty entries for next season by the last of august.

That's a tactic Ratel has used before. It didn't work before, it won't work now. That time limit will move and then move again.
 
It never should have been a World Championship this year. It didn't visit enough continents in the first place. It's just silly now.
It had Europe and Asia, with a race in India. And South America was on the calendar too. But the race at San Luis was the first to go, and now all the Asian races have been dropped.

That's a tactic Ratel has used before. It didn't work before, it won't work now. That time limit will move and then move again.
Ratel doesn't control the series' right to call itself a "World Championship". Only the FIA can recognise a series as a World Championship, and to do that, it has to meet certain criteria.
 
Ratel doesn't control the series' right to call itself a "World Championship". Only the FIA can recognise a series as a World Championship, and to do that, it has to meet certain criteria.

Sorry for not being clearer in what I was saying. I was referring to Ratel's tactic for trying to get teams to sign up for the series. Not the status of the series itself.
 
The organisers might be better off abandoning the 2013 championship and picking it up again in 2014. It's a risk, but the series is in serious disarray. They need a stable calendar and a stable team roster. And I'd also look at getting rid of the driver change requirement, and have one driver per car.

Another idea that I had would be to change the qualifying race format. It's really just a race that decides the grid for the championship race. If they really want a qualifying "race" then they could maybe open up the qualifying session to free running. But rather than basing the grid on one timed lap, they could base it on several. After one hour, each driver's five fastest laps are added together, and the fastest overall time wins, and starts the championship race from pole. It might not be a perfect setup, but at least it would be a unique format that rewards consistent speed and strategy (do you fuel the car light for five flying laps, or do you go heavy and do one long run of ten laps and take the best five times?) and it might be something that restores crediblity to the series.

They should've just given an extension on the homologation for the cars from 2010-11 seasons...
 
Guess you're right, but perhaps it might have given it another year or so and it seems that manufacturers are starting to get back into motorsports. Who knows, maybe it would've generated interest again. Anyways it really is a shame to see this championship die such a painful death.
 
I think both the FIA and SRO needs to think outside the box here.
My two cents:
Only one car per team. This will make the teams take very good care of their equipment, and it will save alot of dough. Max two cars from each brand though, to get as much diversity as possible. GT3 spec cars only. FIA international homologation.

A total rethink of the racing. More diversity. My suggestion goes like this:
1. Abu Dhabi city circuit: 1+1hrs night race
2. Imola: 3hrs
3. Silverstone GP circuit: 3hrs
4. Goodwood hillclimb
5. Long Beach GP circuit: 1+1hrs
6. Sebring: 3hrs
7. Indianapolis Motor Speedway: 200 miles oval race
8. San Luis: 3hrs
9. Spa-Francorchamps: 24hrs
10. Isle of Man TT circuit: 5 lap time trial
11. Monte Carlo: tarmac rally stages
12. Suzuka circuit: 3hrs
13. Macau GP: 1+1hrs
14. Mt. Panorama Bathurst: 3hrs
 
Fia GT has killed itself. The fact that it restricted itself in machinery was one thing (only 1 class), the fact there was limits on teams and car numbers was another - look at the old Le Mans GT2 (now GT-Pro / GT-Am) - thriving classes with a healthy mixture of machinery.

When Ratel announced his "World GT vision" for GT1 / 2 / 3 a few years back, I was sceptical. Seems it's not worked out.
 
Fia GT has killed itself. The fact that it restricted itself in machinery was one thing (only 1 class), the fact there was limits on teams and car numbers was another - look at the old Le Mans GT2 (now GT-Pro / GT-Am) - thriving classes with a healthy mixture of machinery.

When Ratel announced his "World GT vision" for GT1 / 2 / 3 a few years back, I was sceptical. Seems it's not worked out.

I think Ratels idea was great. Not sound though. The financial climat meant it was doomed from the start.

GTE is also basically only one class of cars. And outside the US it isn't as healthy as GT3. At Le Mans only 9 cars entered the pro class, and only 4 brands were present in both pro and am.
 
I think Ratels idea was great. Not sound though. The financial climat meant it was doomed from the start.

GTE is also basically only one class of cars. And outside the US it isn't as healthy as GT3. At Le Mans only 9 cars entered the pro class, and only 4 brands were present in both pro and am.

The thing that gets me is even the Pirelli World Challenge is doing better than the GT3 series.

I reckon if Porsche Supercup allowed different cars (Yeah, stupid idea) they could get tons of sponsors on board with running the same weekend as a Grand Prix. That should be the FIA GT3 series.
 
The Blancpain series effectively is the GT3 series.

It is where all the cars and teams are.

The fact that they are there rather than GT1/3 would indicate that they are not interested in the sprint events that Ratel is pushing.
 
As well as that it shows that teams don't like the Pro/Pro driver pairings that are required for GT1 World. Also Blancpain offers way, way more track time before the racing has even began - perfect for a rich team owner that wants to make sure he gets as much track time as possible.
 
The thing that gets me is even the Pirelli World Challenge is doing better than the GT3 series.

I reckon if Porsche Supercup allowed different cars (Yeah, stupid idea) they could get tons of sponsors on board with running the same weekend as a Grand Prix. That should be the FIA GT3 series.

Yeah, that would be optimal. I've had that thought too. But it seems Bernie has some irrational fear of GT racing, so that will never happen.
 
What I would like to know is what is the cost of running the current GT1/3 car as compared to the full blown GT1 cars of old? I'm thinking probably not much. I love how there are so many entires in BES but not GT1 or 3:(

I think some how all sanctioning bodies all over the world that run GT CARS should come up with a way to make all cars to be in the same classification. That way you can take your car to any series in the world and run it.

I think that would help the Sillyness immensely!!
 
What I would like to know is what is the cost of running the current GT1/3 car as compared to the full blown GT1 cars of old? I'm thinking probably not much. I love how there are so many entires in BES but not GT1 or 3:(

I think some how all sanctioning bodies all over the world that run GT CARS should come up with a way to make all cars to be in the same classification. That way you can take your car to any series in the world and run it.

I think that would help the Sillyness immensely!!

Tell that to the guys here that try to run Grand-Am and the ALMS. They basically have to run 2 different cars for what is effectively the same type of racing.
ESM, AF Corse, Flying Lizard...

As I recall, thats exactly what the DTM and Super GT series are trying to do.
But those are "Super Touring" Cars, not GT.
 
Breaking news on FIA GT1 and FIA GT3...

Towards the Future for SRO Motorsports Group

In view of the worsening economic climate, which has hit not only the grids of the FIA GT Championships but of many other series in the context of an overcrowded sportscar scene, Stephane Ratel, founder and CEO of SRO Motorsports Group, informed the GT Commission, sitting in Paris on July 17th, that SRO did not intend to continue as promoter of the FIA GT1 World Championship and the FIA GT3 European Championship in 2013.

The Commission, while noting SRO’s reasons for this, underlined their support for promoter and teams to bring the 2012 season to a successful finish, in recognition of the investment made by the teams competing this year. A revised calendar for the second half of the season will be issued later this week.

Although this marks the end of SRO’s support to the GT1 World Championship, Ratel has been clear that he hopes that this will not mean the end of a long and fruitful collaboration with the FIA, with various possibilities being studied at the current time.

In the shorter term, SRO Motorsports Group will hold its traditional annual press conference during the company’s flagship event, the Total 24 Hours of Spa. This event, planned for Friday July 27th at 13:00, will see some exciting announcements concerning the new structure of SRO’s GT and F3 series, as well as the provisional 2013 calendars.

Source: http://gt1world.com/news/details/towards-the-future-for-sro
 
Not really. FIA GT1 & GT3 both had declining grids this year, there's no point in running those championships if they can't guarantee grids for next year - also the continous changing of the calendar hasn't helped GT1 & GT3E. On the plus side I'm glad the SRO have announced this now rather than...say January next year. Gives the teams plenty of time to figure out where they might be heading next year. On a side note, it's not necessarily the end of the FIA GT1 WC - but SRO won't be part of it's future.

In my opinion this is a good thing. Don't get me wrong, the track action in GT1 is great but the series has been dying for years now. Hopefully this is the final nail in the coffin for FIA GT1 World and hopefully the kick that the GT racing world needs to sort itself out.

What I am interested in is seeing how this announcement will effect the feeder series (BGT, ADAC GT Masters etc).
 
Back